Fair Practices in debt collection India (a) In the matter of recovery of dues, banks / NBFCs may ensure that they, as also their agents, adhere to the extant instructions on Fair Practice Code for lenders (circular DBOD. Leg. No. BC. 104 /09.07.007 / 2002-03 dated May 5, 2003) as also IBA's Code for Collection of dues and repossession of security. In case banks / NBFCs have their own code for collection of dues it should, at the minimum, incorporate all the terms of IBA's Code. (b) In particular, in regard to appointment of third party agencies for debt collection, it is essential that such agents refrain from action that could damage the integrity and reputation of the bank / NBFC and that they observe strict customer confidentiality. All letters issued by recovery agents must contain the name and address of a responsible senior officer of the card issuing bank whom the customer can contact at his location. (c) Banks / NBFCs / their agents should not resort to intimidation or harassment of any kind, either verbal or physical, against any person in their debt collection efforts, including acts intended to humiliate publicly or intrude the privacy of the credit card holders' family members, referees and friends, making threatening and anonymous calls or making false and misleading representations. Redressal of Grievances a. Generally, a time limit of sixty (60) days may be given to the customers for preferring their complaints / grievances. b. The card issuing bank / NBFC should constitute Grievance Redressal machinery within the bank / NBFC and give wide publicity about it through electronic and print media. The name and contact number of designated grievance redressal officer of the bank / NBFC should be mentioned on the credit card bills. The designated officer should ensure that genuine grievances of credit card subscribers are redressed promptly without involving delay. c. The grievance redressal procedure of the bank / NBFC and the time frame fixed for responding to the complaints should be placed on the bank / NBFC's website. The name, designation, address and contact number of important executives as well as the Grievance Redressal Officer of the bank / NBFC may be displayed on the website. There should be a system of acknowledging customers' complaints for follow up, such as complaint number / docket number, even if the complaints are received on phone. d. If a complainant does not get satisfactory response from the bank / NBFC within a maximum period of thirty (30) days from the date of his lodging the complaint, he will have the option to approach the Office of the concerned Banking Ombudsman for redressal of his grievance/s. The bank / NBFC shall be liable to compensate the complainant for the loss of his time, expenses, financial loss as well as for the harassment and mental anguish suffered by him for the fault of the bank and where the grievance has not been redressed in time. Internal control and monitoring systems With a view to ensuring that the quality of customer service is ensured on an on-going basis in banks / NBFCs, the Standing Committee on Customer Service in each bank / NBFC may review on a monthly basis the credit card operations including reports of defaulters to the CIBIL, credit card related complaints and take measures to improve the services and ensure the orderly growth in the credit card operations. Banks / NBFCs should put up detailed quarterly analysis of credit card related complaints to their Top Management. Card issuing banks should have in place a suitable monitoring mechanism to randomly check the genuineness of merchant transactions. Right to impose penalty The Reserve Bank of India reserves the right to impose any penalty on a bank / NBFC under the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 for violation of any of these guidelines.
The debt collection industry has had an indifferent past with many cases of debt recovery leading to verbal or physical abuse and prolonged court cases. With the passing of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act in U.S., debt recovery agents have to follow ethical procedures while reclaiming debts and treat the debtors in a fair manner. Using intimidation or bullying tactics or subjecting the debtor to any form of harassment is illegal. It forbids certain types of misconduct by debt recovery agents as described below.
The recovery agent may make false statements and deceive the debtors that are likely to force them to pay up or disclose information which they are not required to by law. With long experience behind them, the recovery agents may try to verbally scare innocent debtors into submission. Some possible deceiving actions by debt recovery agents are:
- Manipulate the contract or written document - Intimidate the debtor that he or she would be detained by the police - Modify the amount of debt - Accusing the debtor wrongly of having indulged in criminal activity - Behave as if they are from the legal fraternity or are from government prosecuting agencies - Indicate falsely that legal notices have been sent or are on the way
Charging extra amount in addition to the actual debt is a common unfair practice followed by the collectors. They may demand payment for telephone and other communication charges that are not legally permitted. There have been instances of other illegal coercive methods employed by debt recovery agents.
Subjecting the debtors to psychological pressure through harassment is the most terrible form of ill-treatment they can undergo as it can affect the emotion or mental make up of the persons in a grave manner. Some of the ways the debtor can be subjected to mental agony are:
- Verbal abuse through use of foul language - Embarrassing the debtors in public by issuing statements through newspapers or other media - Use of bullying tactics that may lead to physical injury
The company employing a debt recovery agency should take care that the latter does not resort to any of the above mentioned means which are prohibited by law in order to avoid landing themselves in legal trouble as accomplices. There has been cases where a company who hired a collection agency that went to far, and also was included in the litigation that resulted from the collection agency's abuses.
Both K Singh & Tristan Andrews are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
K Singh has sinced written about articles on various topics from Management, Software and Adsense. http://www.delhilaw.firm.in/debtcollection.htmhttp://www.trustman.org/crdthome.htmFull service law firm at Delhi India offer services for patent, real estate, international trade, trademark, real estate, debt collection India. K Singh's top article generates over 14800 views. to your Favourites.
Tristan Andrews has sinced written about articles on various topics from Pets, Education and Collection Agencies. Tristan Andrews writes useful articles about . Discover and explore the world of debt collections. Find out how using. Tristan Andrews's top article generates over 673000 views. to your Favourites.