|
||
Hedging himself on emerging Asia, Bob Buckle, chairman ofthe APEC Economic Committee told the AFP ?If China and
The IMF added that emerging economies, which include
More...Deciding to act quickly and decisively, leaders whocontrol half the world economy also decided not to raise trade barriers butinstead to quickly resolve the WTO Doha round of trade talks. ?A prompt,ambitious and balanced conclusion to the World Trade Organization - DohaDevelopment Agenda negotiations would deliver substantial improvements inmarket access and reduce market-distorting measures in global agriculturaltrade,? they told the BBC.
So why are global leaders pushing for trade? Why not sealoff boarders and depend on domestic industries and consumption? One pointanalysts argue could be the growing clout of developing nations, and theirability to resuscitate the global economy. Proponents of free trade, or thoseagainst protectionism follow the economic principle of comparative advantageie. it allows countries to specialize in the production of goods and servicesin which they have a comparative advantage, leading to the most efficient useof resources at competitive prices. Alan Greenspan, former chair of theAmerican Federal Reserve in his criticism of protectionist proposals said ?Ifthe protectionist route is followed, newer, more efficient industries will haveless scope to expand, and overall output and economic welfare will suffer.?
In this context, industry insiders feel that in resolvingthe financial crisis, which follows the food and fuel crisis, developedcountries are supporting developing countries on their call for free tradehoping that the lack of trade barriers leading to competition will drive forbetter prices, wages, living conditions and a more efficient use of resources.