eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 
eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 

Your Online Guide » Natural Beauty » Health Tips

[I531]Is Milk Good Or Bad
by Richard A. Convery, Ric
Defining hyperextension would probably be a wise place to begin to ensure we are all on the same flight-path in this discussion. Spinal hyperextension can be performed in a number of ways and at different levels of the spine, and although the term is generally associated with the lumbar [or lower] spine, it also commonly occurs at the cervical [or upper] spinal level.
OK, so what is it? Picture this; in a standing side-on position if you drew an imaginary line descending vertically from just behind the ear to the middle of the outside of the foot and then the hips were moved directly forward ahead of that imaginary line the lumbar spine would in fact be hyper-extending. By moving the chin forward of that same imaginary line and significantly tilting the head back you would be hyper-extending the cervical spine. Got the pictures?
Now that we've confirmed what hyperextension actually is, let's now transfer our focus to some of the ways we actually do this before deciding whether it is a good or bad practice to be employed in any sort of quest to reduce or eliminate back and/or neck pain. The commonly recommended activity of lying flat on your stomach with your hands beside your chest where you elevate your upper torso by doing a partial push-up using your arms while leaving everything from the hips and below in their original positions is a form of hyperextension.
Possibly stating the obvious but the habit of thrusting both hips forward while in a standing position in a pseudo stretch-like movement, done in the hope of creating a beneficial effect, is also a form of hyperextension. Swimming can result in hyperextension if done slowly because the hips, being the centre of gravity of the body, tend to sink more deeply into the water.
With a picture of these forms of hyperextension fixed in our thinking, let's ponder the question of whether hyperextension is likely to benefit or harm us if done on a regular and/or repetitive basis. At each of the spine's vertebral levels we find what are referred to as spinous processes. These processes are bony protrusions and are the points of attachment of muscles to the bony vertebral structure and they enable the tendons of the muscles to be effectively secured onto the bone. You can feel these nodular bumps down the middle of the back. Anterior of or in other words directly forward of these protrusions we find the spinal cord running down within the spinal column from which nerve roots emerge. If you have perhaps xperienced the excruciating pain known as sciatica you will be familiar with the extent of the pain nerve compression can generate and consequently when we are reminded of that level of pain we begin to grasp the potential for harm that hyperextension has been known to cause because of the resultant excessive nerve compression.
As the spinal column is hyper-extended these spinous processes as well as the tendons of the muscles attaching at those points are jammed closer together and as a result the potential for the nerves emerging from the spinal cord to be compressed increases significantly. This potential is compounded by the potential for irritation and inflammation of the tendons that are also being forcefully compressed. Additionally the pressure being brought to bear upon the posterior or rear aspects of the intervertebral discs also increases significantly. The frequency of degeneration or displacement of intervertebral discs is vastly higher in the forward direction than in any other, and by increasing the degree of pressure upon the posterior [rear] aspects of the discs, the likelihood of forward displacement or degeneration of the disc also increases dramatically.
OK, from that description are we to conclude that the activity of hyperextension is something we're not supposed to be doing? No, I am certainly not concluding that in any way. Hyperextension is clearly one of the movements the spine is capable of performing under normal circumstances however for those who are suffering chronic back and/or neck pain we are not talking about normal circumstances. For most sufferers the 'normal' spinal movements have at least temporarily become 'abnormally' difficult, and so to now introduce a movement that possesses a higher than necessary potential to traumatise further an already traumatised spine, we fail to demonstrate a whole lot of wisdom. Having later restored the spine to normal function, we might then, if done wisely and with an appropriate preparation and the essential de-compression afterward, hyperextend to the heart's content. Always bear in mind though, and as I make mention of in the book, 'hyperextension can be bad news for a bad back.'
The overwhelming and irrevocable deduction that not only I but thousands of others have ultimately arrived at over the years is that contrary to what many 'professionals' would mindlessly have you believe, there is no upside to including hyperextension as part of your initial rehabilitation program. Thankfully, though there are numerous suitable and particularly effective alternatives, and having then attained your own personal recovery and should you choose to you can later include hyperextension movements without running the risk of a recurrence of your former pain provided you respect the 3 essential primary principles of recovery; 1) symmetry restoration, 2) elasticity restoration of the soft tissue creating movement of the spine, and 3) restoration and maintenance of specific spinal support strength. When you do that, hyperextension represents not a single worry in the world, however if you ignore these principles, you could easily find yourself in a world that feels like it has come to a premature and painful end ?

NSAIDs possess a certain risk for kidney toxicity which contributes to fluid retention and edema while also promoting the aggravation of hypertension.

However, often underappreciated are the blood pressure and kidney effects of NSAIDs. It has long been noted that a potential risk of NSAIDs is a destabilization of blood pressure control in hypertensive patients, particularly if they are treated with ACE inhibitors.

Direct kidney toxicity, deleterious changes in kidney blood flow, and decline in kidney function are seen as a consequence in patients treated with NSAIDs. Edema and worsening of congestive heart failure (CHF) are also potential known consequences of NSAIDs. NSAIDs may also interfere with the cardioprotective effects of aspirin.

However... all is not doom and gloom for NSAIDS.

A study of Medicare patients with osteoarthritis provides additional evidence that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as aspirin reduce the risk of colorectal cancer. Earlier investigations of the drugs' impact on tumor development could not rule out the possibility that an observed protective effect was caused by other preventive health care measures. Researchers note, however, that safer drugs are probably needed before regular preventive therapy can be recommended.

Elizabeth Lamont, MD, MS, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, the study's lead author, states, "Although patients face risks such as bleeding or kidney damage from NSAIDS, they probably are at a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer." Because of the risks posed by the dosage used to treat osteoarthritis, she stresses that currently available NSAIDs should not be used solely to prevent cancer.

Earlier randomized trials indicated that NSAID treatment could possibly prevent the development of precancerous colorectal polyps, but whether or not such therapy also reduces the risk of invasive colorectal cancer has not yet been confirmed. Those trials used relatively low doses of aspirin and showed no significant differences in colorectal cancer rates between the aspirin and placebo groups. While many observational studies have shown a protective effect of NSAIDs against colorectal cancer, interpretation of some of those results may have been clouded by other healthy behaviors of the participants.

First, the researchers reviewed data from the 1993-94 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, in which physicians report on the diagnoses of and treatments prescribed to patients seen during a randomly selected week. Those results verified that older patients with osteoarthritis were more than four times as likely to take NSAIDs as were those without osteoarthritis. They then analyzed information from the Survival Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER)-Medicare program, studying groups of elderly Medicare patients with and without colorectal cancer, to search for associations with NSAID use.

Comparing information on 4,600 individuals with colorectal cancer to data from 100,000 controls, they found that a history of osteoarthritis was associated with a 15 percent reduction in the likelihood of a colorectal cancer diagnosis.

"The magnitude of colorectal cancer risk reduction between patients with and without osteoarthritis is completely consistent with the risk reduction for pre-cancerous polyps reported in clinical trials of NSAIDs," Lamont says.

The study appears in the August 2007 Journal of General Internal Medicine.

The study also raises the 64 dollar question which is ?What is the risk/benefit of taking an NSAID for cancer prevention versus the risk of cardiovascular side-effects?

As a practicing rheumatologist, I am in a constant battle with cardiologists who want to stop NSAID therapy. In addition to quality of life issues, this most recent study also raises another issue- that of possible colon cancer prevention.
Article Source : Pg. 201

About Author
Both Richard A. Convery & Nathan Wei are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.

Richard A. Convery has sinced written about articles on various topics from Health, Fitness and Health. Richard A. Convery is an expert on relief. Over many years he has been helping many thousands of people to alleviate their. Richard A. Convery's top article generates over 22200 views. to your Favourites.

Nathan Wei has sinced written about articles on various topics from Arthritis Pain, Health and Arthritis Signs. athan Wei, MD FACP FACR is a rheumatologist and Director of the Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center of Maryland. He is a Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. For more info:. Nathan Wei's top article generates over 550000 views. to your Favourites.
EditorialToday Natural Beauty has 3 sub sections. Such as Acne & Skin, Women and Beauty and Beauty Tips. With over 20,000 authors and writers, we are a well known online resource and editorial services site in United Kingdom, Canada & America . Here, we cover all the major topics from self help guide to A Guide to Business, Guide to Finance, Ideas for Marketing, Legal Guide, Lettre De Motivation, Guide to Insurance, Guide to Health, Guide to Medical, Military Service, Guide to Women, Pet Guide, Politics and Policy , Guide to Technology, The Travel Guide, Information on Cars, Entertainment Guide, Family Guide to, Hobbies and Interests, Quality Home Improvement, Arts & Humanities and many more.
About Editorial Today | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Submit an Article | Our Authors