In fact, today there are two marketplaces. One is the old-fashioned traditional marketplace of resumes, classified ads, website postings, agencies and recruiters, interviews and rejection letters.
The other is the hot fast-track job search marketplace of career partners, contact banks, automated interviews, professional introductions, interactive dialogs, on-the-spot employment creation and savvy negotiations.
Let me show you what I mean.
In a traditional job search, you start by putting together a resume. Your resume follows a prescribed format that includes an objective statement and your job history in a reverse chronological order. You add educational and personal data.
You take a look in the Sunday paper and comb through job openings and you check out some online job sites. You send out a few resumes and/or post them on some popular websites.
Maybe you approach a couple agencies or recruiters. If all goes well you get called in for an interview, maybe two, maybe none. The procedure is pretty straightforward.
The job you're applying for is clear-cut, too. The interviewer knows what's desirable in a candidate. At the interview you dress well, behave pleasantly, do your best to answer the questions.
If there is a match between your background and the employer's needs you may advance to the next level in the decision-making process. Maybe you're called back, maybe not. If not, you may get a ?thanks-but-no-thanks? letter. But, then, there's always the hope for another interview somewhere.
That was then. The dynamics of the 21st Century have changed everything.
OK. You can still find classified openings in the newspaper. There are still lots of agencies and recruiters at work, as well. But the marketplace has shifted dramatically.
Expectations of both employers and job-seekers have moved in decidedly new directions. For example, employers expect job-seekers to know and understand corporate goals. They want prospects to demonstrate how they can contribute.
On the other hand, job opportunities are being created on the spot and the candidate can be part of the creation process. Above-average deals are the products of above average negotiations where ?dollars? is only one part of the total package.
Most importantly, if you want to excel, if you want a superior job with more money, if you want to select your next job rather than settle for it, you must understand and embrace the dynamics of today's job marketplace.
You do that in 2 steps:
STEP ONE: throw out everything you ever heard about how to find a job!
STEP TWO: become an expert in the exciting new skills and strategies that can propel you job-search success!
They were then promoted from actually doing the work as a productive part of the organization, to supervising others who are on their way up.
Much later, if the politics of birth, etc. were right, he moved from telling selected people what to do, to the head of the business where he now taught what he knew to the people who were telling the others what to do.
That went on until it was time or past time for him to be let out to pasture.
That was then, "Doing it Right" is now and the future.
"Doing it Right" is based on the principles of right action, the right people doing the right things in the right way and for the right reasons.
For instance, in 2006 a new-hire may know as much or more about the right way as the old man.
The right way to do things is only the right way if it results in pushing us in the right direction.
The old man has valuable insights the new-hire needs to understand, sooner rather than later, about what really is the right direction. And the people in the middle add value to those below and above them.
Contributions to future success come from all levels of the enterprise - and its not just the boys any more.
The problem in many companies is that everyone has their picture of the right ways, the right directions, and the right reasons. They assume their picture is what everyone else is seeing.
A few years ago there was a lot ink dedicated to the revolutionary idea of the "flattened hierarchy" style of management, where bureaucratic organizations were eliminating some if not most of the levels within their organization.
The idea was to get ideas, strategies, etc. from the top to the very bottom in 2-3 steps. This was supposed to enhance communications, efficiencies, innovations, etc. This was so obvious. What was the big deal?
The vast majority of all businesses already had that sort of organization in place. And they were not any better at doing things right. Just because they did not have the money to have more levels of management did not mean they were more productive.
Today companies are successful not because of their organization charts but because of an internal attitude that supports the principles of doing it right.
The 21st Century version of the flattened hierarchy is to empower individuals wherever they are in the organization to step outside their defined boxes and contribute.
It is about an atmosphere of learning, doing, and teaching simultaneously by everyone to everyone for the benefit of everyone.
When the machine operators, supervisors, managers, and owner/operators (you fill in your job descriptions) effortlessly pass information and respect up, down, across, and around the organization, they've got it.
If a new-hire thinks they know best about how things should be done, they should be taught why, in terms of the organizations mission to help them confirm to themselves and others that their idea are valid.
Or to teach them more about the direction we are headed to make sure their how will actually take them that way.
The old man needs to know what to look for when putting on more new hires and promoting more people into the roles of a successful 21st Century company.
The more he knows about what is really going on out there on the floor, in the community, and the industry, the better choices he can make.
The people in the middle, the supervisors and team leaders, traditionally being pushed from one direction and pulled from the other, need to learn how to effectively turn this pressure into steam that drives the organization.
So, what is my point? Well it is not your dads or granddads business environment any more. And if that is true how can everyone contribute as team members, cooperate as team players, to create a winning team?
First an atmosphere free of traditional labor vs management must be present. In the 21st Century long-term interdependent relationships based on this old model will not survive.
There is more external competition than we can stand already, we do not need it inside the organization too.
Second the people at the top must admit that they do not know everything and that just because their partner's daughter is twenty three and has been there four months, does not mean she doesn't have excellent/valid input into the way things ought to be.
Third everybody else must admit that just because the boss is old (55+) does not mean he "just doesn't get it" and that he will "never change." Both groups have so much to offer the team and being able to offer it without fear of criticism is mandatory.
And finally there should be a structured way of systematically reinforcing the right actions we understand, learning the ones we don't, and communicating them within the organization.
Human nature keeps drawing us back to where we are comfortable, so we need a continual push until the new place is more comfortable than the old.
The introduction and reinforcement of right action strategies is the purpose of "Doing it Right,Realizing Your Company's Potential."
It dovetails with existing task oriented training to provide the framework for overall actions.
It provides a context for sponsoring organizations, trade associations for example, to better serve their constituencies by providing a framework around their existing educational programs.
The principles of right actions are vital for you personal and business success "Doing it Right" may offer you the best way to establish and maintain those right actions.
And now, its content is available online at no charge. There will be no more excuses for not doing it right.
Both Paul Megan & Wayne Messick are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Paul Megan has sinced written about articles on various topics from Employment, Careers and Job Hunting and Employment. Paul Megan manages EEI, the world class leader in alternative job search strategies and non-traditional career advancement since 1985. Check out THE WORLD'S FASTEST JOB SEARCH SYSTEM! Grab EEI's stunning FREE REPORT: "How To Lock Up A High-Paying Job In 1. Paul Megan's top article generates over 60500 views. to your Favourites.
Wayne Messick has sinced written about articles on various topics from Employment, Education Toys and Marketing. Wayne Messick wants to interview Click here for. Wayne Messick's top article generates over 12100 views. to your Favourites.