It has been reported by the Public Accounts Committee that medical negligence affects one in ten patients per year that stay in UK hospitals. This figure is unacceptable and amounts to nearly a million people that have suffered unnecessarily at the hands of medical professionals who were trusted with their care and welfare. It believed of this number, over 2,000 were fatal mistakes.
These figures do not include the estimated quarter of unreported incidents and another thirty nine per cent of near misses. Until all incidents are reported fully, a complete picture cannot be built and measures will not be in place to prevent all further incidents.
Surgical errors, wrong doses of medication, falls and mis-diagnosis were the mistakes made, some due to human error, some to understaffing pressures and some through staff simply not applying their knowledge correctly. Someone has to be held accountable for these things and this leads to personal injury claims against hospitals. These claims result in compensation pay outs that the NHS can ill afford.
One such patient has recently won a 3.4 pounds million personal injury claim after a hospital failed to diagnose an unstable fracture. A fracture sounds pretty minimal but when you consider the fracture was in the man's neck, mis-diagnosed and treated as a mild neck injury and led to a much more serious spinal cord injury with paralysis, you can see how he deserves the compensation.
This farmer had an accident with his tractor and was taken to hospital by ambulance suffering from a neck injury. Staff failed to spot the unstable fracture and therefore he didn't receive the correct treatment. The patient was mobilised causing a severe injury to the spinal cord. He was unable to go back home and car for himself but alternative suitable accommodation could not be found, leading him to have to stay in the spinal injury unit for over two years.
A personal injury lawyer eventually secured the admission of negligence from the hospital and enough interim payments to allow the patient to secure adapted accommodation in a house near his family. With no sensation below the chest and limited movement in the upper arms, the patient's life has been changed beyond all recognition and although he is now adapting to the way he will see out his life, it would not have happened had hospital staff taken more care in studying his X-rays.
The result of a 3.4 pounds million personal injury claim may sound substantial but when you think about how someone's neglect has brought about a change to this man's course of life and how he will now have to pay someone to care for him for the rest of his life, you can see how the payment is just.
It is only through the medical negligence incidents being reported, thoroughly investigated and claimed for that not only will people receive the care that they need but future accidents will hopefully be reduced. You can never get rid of human error totally but if hospitals were better staffed, there would be less pressure, things could be checked and re-checked because staff would have more time and the occasions of medical negligence would be reduced to a point where the country would once again be able to have faith in its health system. An issue for the government I think.
I saw a staff's report the other day in my company, apologizing for the quality of service he was providing to customers. What's the issue? Delay caused by human error. This happens not just one time. Because he does his tasks by hand and these tasks are often repetitive actions, so that he has to make mistakes sometimes.
As I know, there is no one in the world who never makes error, especially these who have to face the monotonous, not interesting tasks. In a company, some studies estimate that human error, primarily typographical errors and accidental data deletion, cause around 30 percent of all errors. The problem is not the complexity of the systems, but the fact that much of systems is currently done manually. This is why my colleague continues to make errors in his job. Automation of these business process transactions can substantially reduce human errors therefore saving a company valuable resource.
But how do you automate these business process transactions? Normally, people will obviously think about to use automation software. Depending to your demand, you choose right an automation software. For example, if you need data transfer everyday, you should use utility software. Macro Expert is just one. It is automation tool designed to complete those tasks which are repetitive or routine for you, and those tasks actually cause you to make errors. You can create a macro to automate this task. A macro is a set of keystroke, mouse actions and instructions that are recorded, saved, edited. The recorded keystroke, mouse action and instructions can be played back in further. Then you can use the built macro to replay these repetitive steps again and again instead of you.
Automating these business process transactions, you can reduce in human error. By using automation software, you can improve your profit. Whether you believe or not, it's worth for you to have a try. Refer Macro Expert at http://www.macro-expert.com/
Both Shaun Parker & Jill Shu are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Shaun Parker has sinced written about articles on various topics from Online Marketing, Auto Insurance and Wedding Bells. Shaun Parker is a leading financial expert with many years of experience in the compensation industry. Find out more about claims at. Shaun Parker's top article generates over 246000 views. to your Favourites.