eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 
eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 

Your Online Guide » Education and Teaching » Articles on Education

[U62]University And College Rankings
by Clint Cora, Cli

Many new university and college graduates have no idea of what industries they want to work in for their future careers. Even those who do have at least some idea of what type of field they want to work in, it often shows during their job interviews that they haven't done enough research on their future careers.

Many university and college graduates, especially those with arts and science degrees, will interview for all sorts of potential jobs in many different industries. I've seen students applying to almost any job that has the slightest appeal posted at the campus career and job placement centers. I should know since I was such a student many years ago. Unfortunately, this job search approach that is not really targeted towards any specific field often results in giving an impression of ignorance during job interviews.

Employers usually prefer candidates who have shown to have done some good research into their industries and be able to at least talk a little ‘shop' during job interviews. Those candidates who have not done any industry research at all will give the impression that all they want is a job, any job in whichever industry they can get into first.

These individuals have no clear idea of whether they would even enjoy working in the fields that they are applying for in the first place. Therefore, such candidates are considered as high risk by employers and chances of getting hired are minimal. After all, why hire somebody who might not like the job and leave the company after a month?

Graduates who have taken the time to learn about their targeted industries will come across as more knowledgeable and more serious about specific job positions. These will be the individuals that make it to the next step in the interviewers' minds.

So if you are a new university or college graduate (or soon to be one), do take the time to do some research about any industry that you think you would like to enter when you begin your working career. There are lots of resources online and at the library to help you. There are also many books available out there on specific careers.

For example, if you want to get into the investment industry, learn more about that field. If you want to be in healthcare, learn more about that area and what's involved on a day to day basis. Just because you graduated in science doesn't mean that you would like to work with patients or be in a lab environment each day. If you want to get into sales, especially for a specific industry such as pharmaceuticals, learn more about that specific sector as the sales field is quite vast. The sales environment can differ greatly between different industries.

You can also contact individuals who are already working in certain industries to do information interviews with them to learn more about their work. This will help you prepare for job interviews with companies in those particular industries as well as to confirm whether you would really want to work in those fields.

So increase your chances of being hired in an industry that you choose to be in by learning more about that field. Don't give interviewers the impression that you are willing to get just any job in any industry just to start getting a paycheck.


But college administrators dislike rankings. I understand some of the reasons why; it's almost impossible to compare dissimilar schools and the formulas and methodologies are considered non-scholarly by academics. College presidents have said that peer assessment means little when their peers base their judgments on the past perceptions of their schools.

This year, according to U.S. News and World Report, a record low 51 percent of college presidents completed their reputational survey in which they rank their peer institutions. Eight years ago, more than two-thirds completed it. This peer assessment represents 25 percent of a school's overall ranking. I could guess that the rankings would be less valid as more schools refuse to share information, as well as reliable statistics with the magazine.

However, you can't keep a good journalistic team down. U.S. News and World Report has been collecting and compiling this information for 24 years. Data collection and compilation for these rankings have been refined nine times, partly in response to institutional concerns. They have plenty of incentive; the America's Best Colleges issue and print guide are hot selling magazines. They would not be hot-sellers if they didn't try to be ahead of the curve and become more statistically valid.

Like it or not, these rankings are not going away. Not as long as colleges advertise high rankings as if they're a "good housekeeping seal" of approval. All educational institutions K-12, colleges and universities are operating in an era where parents and policy makers desire greater accountability and more statistical measures. Even if U.S. News quit publishing America's Best Colleges, another source would step up in its place. College and university presidents should consider themselves fortunate if Congress does not support that source.

One association, The National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (NAICU) launched their own Web-based tool called U-CAN, which stands for University and College Accountability Network. U-CAN is a nationwide effort to provide consumer information to parents and students, including financial statistics, about privately supported institutions.

NAICU claims that U-CAN is not a reaction to published rankings; according to public content on their site, U-CAN was created in response to public demand for comparable, concise, relevant, and easily accessible information. But I scrolled down and noticed that NAICU acknowledges that if "consumers, Congress, and the administration decide that the information on U-CAN is self-serving and of little value, the likely alternative is new federal reporting mandates."

So, NAICU is behaving much like a business association of firms in the same industry; let's try to regulate ourselves before the government steps in. U-CAN is NAICU's attempt at self-regulation. As someone who has been in the education site business, I was curious to see how U-CAN worked. I played with U-CAN, much like a parent or student would.

Here's what I liked about U-CAN:

+ It's free and there's no need to register. If I were a student, I do not become part of a junk-mail database to schools that are of no interest to me.

+ Navigation is clear and simple'if your heart is already set on a very small number of private schools.

+ U-CAN has statistics that I cannot find in other published sources, specifically the tuition history, four-year and five-year graduation rates, diversity indices, student indebtedness, a price breakdown for tuition and fees, average net tuition charge (after grants in aid), residence life and direct access to campus safety information.

Some of this information is available on other sites, but not as easily searchable; in the case of U.S. News, you have to pay a fee for premium access to obtain more detail beyond the top schools on their lists.

U-CAN is comprehensive, and makes it an admirable effort; it is considerable work to secure cooperation from so many schools (approximately 450, as I write this piece), let alone organize the data in a user-friendly format.

U-CAN is useful, but less than perfect, for considering private colleges.

The first problem is unmemorable domain names. The host association uses a dot-edu in its web address instead of a dot-com, dot-net or dot-org; that's an unusual practice because the sponsor is a not-for-profit association, not an academic institution. The domain for the U-CAN site is http://ucan-network.org. This surprised me when I typed ucan dot-org and got nowhere. They cannot use ucan dot-org; that domain belongs to the Utility Consumer's Action Network.

So, my first suggestion to NAICU is to buy U-CAN dot-org, dot-com and dot-net before someone else does'or find a new name.

Two other problems come from searches. You cannot return to a list of search results if you want to look at more than one school in a state. For instance, I selected New Jersey and got a list of independent schools in the Garden State. After I finished viewing the complete profile of one school, I could not return to my list. I had to do the same search again. In addition, I could not do a search across schools in more than one state.

The search problems can make U-CAN quite cumbersome and, by comparison, they make the U.S. News print and online guides seem more user-friendly, if I want to compare schools.

That leads me to another suggestion: develop a print version of U-CAN that groups the schools by state and type of school using the available statistics. A print version of U-CAN confronts a major advantage of other guides?they're also books?parents and guidance counselors are more techno-phobic than high school students. The most difficult statistic to format in tables is probably tuition history. U-CAN lists tuition charges for each of the past five years; that can be converted into an average tuition increase.

U-CAN is an excellent site, if you have already whittled down your choices to a small number of private schools. It's better designed to be your last stop for information gathering?after you've bought the U.S. News guide, read student school reviews and done your campus visits?instead of your first.
Article Source : Pg. 35

About Author
Both Clint Cora & Stuart Nachbar are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.

Clint Cora has sinced written about articles on various topics from Careers and Job Hunting, Tax and Careers and Job Hunting. . Clint Cora's top article generates over 27100 views. to your Favourites.

Stuart Nachbar has sinced written about articles on various topics from Education, Presidential Election Results and Education. Stuart Nachbar has been involved with education politics, policy and technology as a student, urban planner, government affairs manager, software executive, and now as author of The Sex Ed Chronicles. Visit his blog,. Stuart Nachbar's top article generates over 9900 views. to your Favourites.
EditorialToday Education and Teaching has 2 sub sections. Such as Education Today and Early Childhood Learning. With over 20,000 authors and writers, we are a well known online resource and editorial services site in United Kingdom, Canada & America . Here, we cover all the major topics from self help guide to A Guide to Business, Guide to Finance, Ideas for Marketing, Legal Guide, Lettre De Motivation, Guide to Insurance, Guide to Health, Guide to Medical, Military Service, Guide to Women, Pet Guide, Politics and Policy , Guide to Technology, The Travel Guide, Information on Cars, Entertainment Guide, Family Guide to, Hobbies and Interests, Quality Home Improvement, Arts & Humanities and many more.
About Editorial Today | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Submit an Article | Our Authors