eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 
eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 

Your Online Guide » Guide to Finance » How To Handle Finances

[C1231]Credit Card Protection Insurance
by Charles Phelan, Cha

Credit protection insurance is a good example of a consumer rip-off that affects millions of people, yet receives little attention in the financial media. Simply stated, you should NEVER buy "credit protection insurance," or a "payment protection plan" or any other similar type of credit-related insurance. Let's take a look at how these programs work and why they are a bad deal for the average consumer.

First, let's dispense with the scam version of this insurance. With identity theft in the news so much lately, con artists have set up telemarketing boiler rooms to call people and try to scare them into buying worthless credit insurance products. Representatives will try to convince you that you're at risk if someone gets hold of your card and starts making fraudulent purchases in your name. When they call, they may even pretend to be from the "security department" of your bank. In fact, they may actually be part of an identify theft ring, with the goal of getting you to disclose personal information over the phone. Or they may simply be trying to make a fast buck by selling you an insurance policy that you absolutely don't need.

Under Federal law, you are limited to a maximum of $50 liability for unauthorized use of your credit card. If you didn't authorize a charge, don't pay it! Follow your credit card bank's procedure for disputing bogus charges. You simply don't need insurance to protect yourself from a situation that is already covered by Federal law!

Now, what about those "payment protection plans" offered directly by the big credit card banks? These are plans that promise to cover your minimum monthly payments for an extended period of time (usually 12-24 months) if you get laid off from your job, become hospitalized due to an accident or illness, or become disabled. On the surface, a plan like this sounds like a pretty good idea. After all, how could you keep up with your payments if you suddenly lost your job or became too ill to work?

Of course, you should not be carrying balances on your credit cards anyway. If everyone paid their balances in full every month, then credit protection insurance would not even exist in its current form. You are charged for the insurance based on the amount of debt you're carrying on the card, so if the balance is zero, then there is no fee. In fact, some bank representatives use this as part of the sales pitch when trying to entice people to sign up for that "free 3-month trial" on their payment protection plan! They attempt to talk you into adding the insurance now, while you don't need it and when there is no cost, in the hope that one day you will start carrying a balance. By then, you'll probably have forgotten you signed up, and you'll wonder what those mysterious charges are on your statement every month.

If you do carry balances on your cards, credit protection insurance is still a very bad deal. To see why, let's look at the math here. A typical loss protection plan costs 85 cents for every $100 of balance carried on the card. So if you're carrying a debt of $5,000 on the credit card, it will cost you $42.50 per month to buy the insurance. Over the course of 12 months, you will spend $510 under this scenario. That's equivalent to paying an extra 10% in annual interest!

A light bulb should be shining over your head right about now. Why not take that same $42.50 per month and use it to pay down the balance faster? Good question. When you consider that most consumers who have credit protection carry it year after year, without ever becoming eligible for a claim against the insurance policy, the amount of wasted money can add up to a truly staggering sum.

Continuing with our $5,000 example, with a typical minimum payment of $125/month, it will take more than 26 years to pay off the balance in full, at a cost of $7,115.42 in interest. By applying that extra $42.50 per month that would otherwise go toward the insurance, for a total monthly payment of $167.50, you'll have the debt paid off in only 40 months! And you'll have saved $5,435.22 in interest charges. It simply makes no sense to waste this money , especially when you consider that the credit protection plan is normally only good for 12-24 months anyway.

There's another important factor involved here. Credit protection is also a bad deal because the eligibility requirements are so very restrictive. When you read the fine print, you'll realize that there are all kinds of situations that aren't covered. Let's say, for example, that you've been fighting a medical condition for some time. So you buy the insurance thinking it's a good idea. Eventually, you end up in the hospital for treatment and recovery. Can you breathe a little easier knowing your credit card payments are covered? Nope. Most of these policies have exclusions for pre-existing conditions. And there are numerous other loopholes that allow the bank to deny your claim under the policy. In view of the lousy math and the restrictive nature of this type of insurance, these programs should really be named "bank profit protection" instead of "credit protection insurance." Instead of spending good money on an insurance plan that you will probably never use, you're far better off applying that same amount toward paying off the debt early.


This form of protection insurance should not be confused with income payment protection insurance. Income payment protection insurance would provide you with a replacement income if you were made redundant or were unable to work after suffering an illness or an accident. It would provide you with an income from between 30 and 90 days depending on the provider which would last for between 12 and 24 months.

Income protection insurance would not payout if you were to become unemployed by redundancy. It would cover you in case you should fall ill or if you had an accident that meant you were unable to work. Another big difference between the two policies is that it would provide long term protection, up to the age of retirement if needed. This means that if you fall ill or suffer an accident the cover would begin to provide you with a replacement income and continue to do so right up to you retiring if you could not go back to work.

Many providers who offer this type of insurance also offer premium rate. This means that you are able to take out premiums that remain fixed the whole time you are paying for the policy. The actual premium you will be asked to pay will depend largely on your circumstances. Your age might play a factor in the rate for the premium however other factors will also be taken into account and play a big part. Your gender, medical history and occupation will be taken into account and if your job puts you at a bigger risk then the premium will be higher. Another big difference between the two types of insurance protection policies is the deferment period. In the case of this policy it is considerably longer.

Covering your income against a loss is essential whichever form of protection insurance you wish to take out. You would be able to continue meeting your essential outgoings and of course one of the most important is your mortgage. If you get behind on your mortgage then you are risking losing your home, as the lender can choose to start repossession proceedings. Just one missed repayment is enough to have the lender send you a letter and wanting to know when you are going to catch up on the arrears. If you do not know when you are able to go back to work you would not be able to make any arrangement to repay.

Of course you would also be able to continue to pay all your other essential outgoings such as loan, credit card repayments and also other bills that have to go out each month. Both income protection insurance and income payment protection are both valuable forms of cover which can save you additional stress and anxiety.
Article Source : Pg. 120

About Author
Both Charles Phelan & Simon Burgess are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.

Charles Phelan has sinced written about articles on various topics from Bankruptcy Law, Income Tax Return and Credit Counseling. . Charles Phelan's top article generates over 1900 views. to your Favourites.

Simon Burgess has sinced written about articles on various topics from Mortgage Insurance, Finances and Income Protection Insurance. Simon Burgess is Managing Director of the award-winning , a specialist provider of. Simon Burgess's top article generates over 74000 views. to your Favourites.
EditorialToday Guide to Finance has 5 sub sections. Such as Introduction to Accounting, Payroll Information, Loan Guide, Tax Matters and Introduction to Finance. With over 20,000 authors and writers, we are a well known online resource and editorial services site in United Kingdom, Canada & America . Here, we cover all the major topics from self help guide to A Guide to Business, Guide to Finance, Ideas for Marketing, Legal Guide, Lettre De Motivation, Guide to Insurance, Guide to Health, Guide to Medical, Military Service, Guide to Women, Pet Guide, Politics and Policy , Guide to Technology, The Travel Guide, Information on Cars, Entertainment Guide, Family Guide to, Hobbies and Interests, Quality Home Improvement, Arts & Humanities and many more.
About Editorial Today | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Submit an Article | Our Authors | Financial Terminology » A - E » F - L » » S - Z