eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 
eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 

Your Online Guide » Divorce Guide » Divorce and Infidelity

[T828]The Worlds Worst Singer
by Peter Woronoff, Pet
Confession number one: I was the world's worst speller.

Confession number two: I always hated my brother and sister.

Well, OK, not really. But I hated that they always got such good grades in school when it was such a struggle for me. I was really good at sports and really good at art and music. I was good at science too, but I couldn't spell my way out of a paper bag. Actually, when it came right down to it, I was only really bad at spelling and, fortunately, it only affected my grades in subjects that used words.

Now this was especially frustrating cause I started out thinking I was pretty clever. I was reading better than most kids in my grade early on. It was easy. You sounded out the letters and put them together to make words. E. Z.

But then something weird started happening. For some reason, the same sounding-it-out process that worked so perfectly for reading didn't work for spelling. When the teacher said a word on the spelling test, I'd repeat how it sounded in my head and figure out what letters made those sounds and write them down. I was wrong more than half the time and got no points for creativity.

I didn't get it. It was a complete mystery to me. My confidence plummeted. I felt stupid and silly. Moreover, I couldn't get any help. My Dad told me to look up the spellings in the dictionary. But he couldn't explain to me how to go about doing that when I didn't know how to spell the word I was looking up.

"Work harder," I was told. I spent hours memorizing the order of the letters by repeating them out loud over and over again. I think I remember only once ever getting a 100% on a spelling test.

So part of me began to believe I was stupid. My good grades in science and several other subjects weren't enough to convince me otherwise. Of course, it was logical to make that deduction. No matter how hard I tried it didn't get any better so I must be stupid, right?

No. The answer to that question is emphatically no. But, I didn't find that out for many years after graduating high school. Part of me still believed it even as a grownup, while running a successful seminar promotion company in New York. I joked about being "the world's worst speller." (Unfortunately, my secretary wasn't much better so we were awfully glad when word processors began to have spell check.)

Then it happened. I attended a seminar by a co-developer of NLP, Robert Dilts. This is the study of the structure of subjective experience. It holds out the promise that since any skill or ability is a result of that structure, that ability can be "modeled" and taught to another human being.

Astonishingly, to illustrate this, Robert used spelling as an example. It wasn't that poor spellers were stupid, Robert said, it was that they had been taught an ineffective strategy for spelling. This struck me as a radical idea.

He explained how human beings process our experience of the world with our five senses and that each sense had different advantages and disadvantages. He said, as an example, phonics (sounding out the words) works well for reading but that it doesn't work for spelling. He points out that you can't even spell the word "phonetics" phonetically! Instead, when you analyze the strategy that good spellers use, they visualize the word in their mind's eye and get a good feeling when it is spelled right.

He then demonstrated how this worked. He got a volunteer from the audience (He did not pick me even though my hand was high in the air) who was a self-proclaimed bad speller and asked them to spell the city, "Albuquerque." We all watched as the volunteer looked down at his feet, squirmed uncontrollably, and tried to talk his way through the mysterious word.

As you can imagine, that method didn't work. He wasn't even close. (Neither, by the way, was I, spelling at my seat.) So then Robert had him write the word out on a big piece of paper in small chunks of two or three letters, "Al - bu - quer - que." He had the volunteer write each word chunk in a different color and then practice visualizing those chunks with his eyes closed. Finally, he put them all together and spelled Albuquerque correctly for the first time in his life. Then, as if that wasn't impressive enough, he spelled it backwards!

I was sold! I wanted some of this! Over the next few days I practically filled a notebook with large, colorful, small-chunked spelling words and showed off how I could spell backwards and forwards.

Today I am content to spell forwards most of the time and I have to confess am happy to have relinquished the title of world's worst speller. My hope is that someday no one will have to wait until adulthood to learn to spell like a champ.

With Englands Ashes failure still a horrible thorn in most English cricket fans memory the excuses and reasons why the tour was a miserable failure are now only just starting to surface. Ex England players, respected media men and the ordinary cricket supporter in the street have voiced there own opinion on why the Australian outfit thrashed a sorry looking England team.

One school of thought that has started to come to light was Englands batting order. With most of the top 5 hopelessly out of form apart from the world class Kevin Pietersen many cricket fans were hoping that Andrew Flintoff would come to the party. Sadly this did not materialise. Lets make one thing clear in defence of the champion English all rounder, his fitness. Flintoff has had serious ankle problems for some time now and with a serious bowling workload expected from him over the 5 tests and the marathon one day series surely something had to give.

It did of course, and it was his batting. Consistent low scores and looking totally lost at sea when facing quality seam and spin bowling resulted in the Lancashire all rounder failing miserably. By the end of series there have been big question marks on whether Flintoff has the talent and technique to be successful at the pivotal number 6 batting position for his country.

With Michael Vaughn now recovering from serious injury and looking to force his way back into the team, the burden of captaincy should now be taken away from Flintoff. Often looking tired and dejected in the field (who wouldnt be after being constantly let down by both his bowlers and batsman alike) this must have had a serious effect on his own concentration and confidence levels when trudging out to bat.

In 2005 when England won back the Ashes since 1986-7 Flintoff was the main catalyst for the triumphant England team. In other sports such as football such key players are often rested in order to protect form and to prevent injuries. In cricket, this is not the case, especially for a losing team where everyone is dependent on the best players. If you compare Flintoff to other number 6 batsman in world cricket he is somewhere in the middle. The problem England has is the frailty of the tail end batsmen and the inconsistency of the top order. Other test teams like India and South Africa have a very strong lower order which often fires and adds an extra 50 to 100 runs. This is often crucial in test matches and can quickly change the momentum of a cricket match.

Only time will tell if Flintoff will succeed at test level batting at number six, infact with coach Duncan Fletcher under serious pressure a change in coach might be on the cards before the Cricket World Cup, that being the case the decision to change the batting line up might be quicker than first thought. Many cricket fans will hope the charismatic Flintoff will shine in the World Cup and dominate the bowling batting at number six, if not at least you know that you will be guaranteed 100 per cent effort from Andrew Flintoff in whatever position he bats.
Article Source : Divorce Court

About Author
Both Peter Woronoff & Martin Davies are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.

Peter Woronoff has sinced written about articles on various topics from Divorce and Infidelity, Web Development and Writing. Peter Woronoff is a Master Practitioner in NLP Neuro Linguistic Programming. With Doug O'Brien, personally designated by Tony Robbins as an NLP Master Trainer, and Rob Marton, he has designed. Peter Woronoff's top article generates over 1000 views. to your Favourites.

Martin Davies has sinced written about articles on various topics from Modelling, Information Technology and Gadgets. Martin writes articles for sport websites and likes to and. Martin Davies's top article generates over 14800 views. to your Favourites.
EditorialToday Divorce Guide has 1 sub sections. Such as Divorce Guide. With over 20,000 authors and writers, we are a well known online resource and editorial services site in United Kingdom, Canada & America . Here, we cover all the major topics from self help guide to A Guide to Business, Guide to Finance, Ideas for Marketing, Legal Guide, Lettre De Motivation, Guide to Insurance, Guide to Health, Guide to Medical, Military Service, Guide to Women, Pet Guide, Politics and Policy , Guide to Technology, The Travel Guide, Information on Cars, Entertainment Guide, Family Guide to, Hobbies and Interests, Quality Home Improvement, Arts & Humanities and many more.
About Editorial Today | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Submit an Article | Our Authors