eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 
eg: UK or Brides UK or Classical Art or Buy Music or Spirituality
 

Your Online Guide » Plastic Surgery » Breast Enlargement

[S470]Silicone Breast Implants Pictures
by Dave Stringham, Dav
Silicones are a family of chemical compounds. They are made from silicon, a naturally occurring element found in sand, quartz and rock. Next to oxygen, silicon is the most common element in the earth's crust and becomes silicone when it is combined with oxygen, carbon and hydrogen. Depending on the arrangement of the molecules, silicones can be manufactured in a variety of forms including oils, gels and solids.

Silicones have been part of the consumer industry for over 50 years. Because they can be manufactured in various ways, silicones appear in a wide variety of products that most of us use everyday. Hairsprays, suntan lotions and moisturizing creams are just some of the consumer products that contain one form of silicone called dimethicone.

Medical devices utilizing silicone include artificial joints, catheters, drainage systems, facial implants, tissue expanders and breast implants. Silicone products have been shown to be biocompatible, reliable, flexible and easy to sterilize, making them an ideal choice for both implantable and non-implantable medical devices.

What makes today's silicone a safe option?

In 1992, the FDA called for a voluntary moratorium (delay) on the use of silicone gel-filled breast implants until new safety information could be thoroughly reviewed by the FDA's advisory panel. That same year, the FDA lifted this moratorium and announced its decision to allow access to silicone breast implants for reconstruction patients under controlled clinical studies, called Adjunct Studies. In 1999, the FDA allowed the use of silicone gel-filled implants in Allergan's Core Clinical Study to assess the safety and effectiveness of these devices.

While these studies are collecting information specific to INAMEDs Silicone-Filled Breast Implants, the National Institute of Health's Institute of Medicine (IOM) released a landmark 400-page report entitled "Safety of Silicone Breast Implants." This 1999 report on the safety ofsilicone concluded "There is insufficient evidence to support an association of silicone breast implants with defined connective tissue disease." The IOM also stated "There is no convincing evidence for atypical connective tissue disease or rheumatic disease or a novel constellation of signs and symptoms in women with silicone breast implants."??

The unique qualities of today's silicone gel-filled breast implants help make it the filler of choice for patients in countries where both saline-filled and silicone gel-filled breast implants are widely available.

With the recent approval of silicone filled breast implants for breast augmentation and breast reconstruction, physicians and patients can be assured of the safety of silicone. This confirmation is based on extensive preclinical testing, four years of data on 715 women from Allergan's Core Clinical Study and a European study that evaluated implant rupture prevalence rates beyond 10 years. In addition, countless published, peer-reviewed studies and research support the safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants.

A study by the US Government looks at silicone implants and confirms findings.
In 1997, the Department of Health and Human Services began one of the most extensive research studies in medical history by appointing the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Science (IOM) to examine potential complications during or after surgery.

The IOM consisted of a 13-member volunteer committee, including six women. The committee was composed of members of the medical, scientific and educational communities with experience in radiology, women's health, neurology, oncology, silicone chemistry, rheumatology, immunology, epidemiology, internal medicine and plastic surgery. No IOM members had on-going relationships or conflicts of interest related to any implant lawsuits.

The result: After reviewing years of evidence and research concerning these implants, the IOM found that "Evidence suggests diseases or conditions such as connective tissue diseases, cancer, neurological diseases or other systemic complaints or conditions are no more common in women with breast implants than in women without implants."

Furthermore, a review of research and medical studies shows:
Extensive studies, including a report by the Institute of Medicine, conclude that breast cancer is no more common in women with implants than in those without implants

The American Academy of Pediatrics concluded in September 2001 "The Committee on Drugs does not feel that the evidence currently justifies classifying silicone implants as a contraindication to breastfeeding."

Epidemiological investigations have not found any increased risk of adverse health outcomes in children born to women with breast implants
Silicone breast implants are arguably the most studied medical devices and decades of research have evaluated their safety and effectiveness.

The Allergan Core Clinical Study

Allergan's Core Clinical Study is an ongoing 10-year study of 940 women who had breast augmentation, reconstruction or revision of a previous surgery between 1999 and 2000. Safety and effectiveness is evaluated through patient follow-up at zero to four weeks, six months, 12 months, 24 months, and annually through 10 years. Safety is assessed by complications, such as implant rupture, capsular contracture and re-operation. Benefit (effectiveness) is assessed by patient satisfaction and measures of body image/esteem and self-esteem.

The result: The FDA has evaluated Allergan's Core Clinical Study data at four years and determined that INAMEDs Silicone-Filled Breast Implants are safe and effective for use in breast augmentation and breast reconstruction.

The Allergan Adjunct Clinical Study

The Allergan Adjunct Clinical Study enrollment was limited to reconstruction and revision surgery patients who met certain inclusion criteria. Between the years of 1998 and 2006, when enrollment in this study was terminated, over 80,000 silicone filled implants were implanted in more than 50,000 women. Safety data is collected at one, three and five years and is used as supplemental data to support the safety of INAMEDs Silicone-Filled Breast Implants.

Studies show silicone gel-filled breast implants are safe, but that doesn't make them right for everybody. Silicone gel-filled breast implants are not lifetime devices.It is possible at some point in your lifetime that the implant(s) would need to be removed or replaced. To ensure that you achieve your optimal results safely, patients should be aware that you should not have breast implant surgery if you:

1. Have existing malignant or pre-malignant cancer of the breast and have not been successfully treated

2. Have an active infection anywhere in the body

3. Are currently pregnant or nursing

You should also know that silicone gel breast implants have not been clinically tested in women with:

1. Autoimmune diseases like lupus or scleroderma

2. Conditions that could interfere with wound healing and blood clotting

3. A weakened immune system (such as women receiving immunosuppressive therapy)

4. Reduced blood supply to the breast tissue

5. Radiation to the breast following implantation

6. Clinical diagnosis of depression or other mental health disorders, including body dysmorphic disorder and eating disorders. Please discuss any history of mental health disorders prior to surgery

Now, the FDA is backing the return of the infamously more natural feeling and looking breast implant, and two lucky manufacturers seem to have the corner on the market right now.

A company called Inamed is currently one the sole producers of this supposedly newer and safer implant device for women who get breast implants, with the original manufacturer, Dow Corning, now a defunct company after being inundated with litigation over the silicone implant, having to file bankruptcy. The other manufacturer to gain FDA approval to start almost immediately marketing their implant was Mentor Corp.

So why now has the FDA decided to lift this ban with only a few restrictions on the silicone implant? Well, although they have met with a lot of resistance from consumer advocacy groups who say the device is nowhere near proven to again be safe, the FDA has agreed to pretty much widely offer the silicone option again.

The only restrictions will be that the person opting for silicone over saline must be at least 22 years of age, which is when experts agree the breast has fully matured on a woman, and there are no restrictions at all if the surgery in reconstructive in nature.

Reconstructive breast implant surgery may be due to a cancer that resulted in removal or partial removal of a breast, or other circumstances where the breasts are seriously deformed or maimed.

Many analysts believe that this new, almost carte blanche approval of the silicone breast implant will lead to the eventual takeover of saline implants, the only currently approved breast implant on the market.

They believe this to be true because many women have actually requested to have the silicone implants, and most women want a more natural feel to their breast implants and look than the saline breast implant can currently offer in their eyes.

The silicone offers a more natural look because it is a gel-like substance which actually mimics the look of real breast tissue fairly well, and "moves" more like a real breast than saline does.

They also are reported to drop more naturally and lay more naturally than a saline implant does. Not only that, but women with silicone breast implants report that both they and their partners think the silicone implant feels natural.

But at what cost? Many silicone-implanted women complained of health issues and complications, and there was an alarmingly high rupture rate on these implants, which led to lawsuits and FDA complaints, and ultimately led to the 14 year ban.

The interesting part here though is that years of research were conducted to see if silicone breast implants had any medical correlation to the reported health issues, which ranged from lupus and cancer, to autoimmune diseases and other complications that could not even be pinpointed.

The benefit that silicone has over saline is only cosmetic in nature. Saline is a completely inert substance which does no harm if the implant ruptures, and this is why it has been the only implant used, while silicone itself has never been proven to be 100% safe when introduced into the blood stream

The FDA has made statements saying the research studies and tests show that the two new implants approved for sale have been shown to be reasonably safe, at least enough for approval, and that there have been no alarming findings that the implant is prone to rupture the silicone fluid into the blood stream.

Although they have been reintroduced for sale, the FDA does tag a warning on them reminding women that they are not lifetime devices, and will need to be removed and replaced, requiring another surgery about once every ten years.

This is actually true for any type of implant though. They also have required manufacturers to sponsor ongoing studies of women with the implants, to further cement the fact that they are safe, over the long haul.
Article Source : breast enlargement financing

About Author
Both Dave Stringham & Danna Schneider are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.

Dave Stringham has sinced written about articles on various topics from Tummy Tucks Before and After, Health and Breast Enlargements. Dave Stringham is the President of LookingYourBest.com an online resource for plastic surgery procedures. Learn more about and plas. Dave Stringham's top article generates over 368000 views. to your Favourites.

Danna Schneider has sinced written about articles on various topics from Acne Treatment, Types of Cancer and Aging Problems. Danna Schneider is the founder of , an online guide about breast health, and natural breast enhancement and news and. Danna Schneider's top article generates over 90500 views. to your Favourites.
EditorialToday Plastic Surgery has 2 sub sections. Such as Plastic Surgery and Women's Health. With over 20,000 authors and writers, we are a well known online resource and editorial services site in United Kingdom, Canada & America . Here, we cover all the major topics from self help guide to A Guide to Business, Guide to Finance, Ideas for Marketing, Legal Guide, Lettre De Motivation, Guide to Insurance, Guide to Health, Guide to Medical, Military Service, Guide to Women, Pet Guide, Politics and Policy , Guide to Technology, The Travel Guide, Information on Cars, Entertainment Guide, Family Guide to, Hobbies and Interests, Quality Home Improvement, Arts & Humanities and many more.
About Editorial Today | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Submit an Article | Our Authors