I was at a grocery store the other day, and, noticed some people picking out fresh produce - They were picking up apples to check for bruising, squeezing red peppers to check for firmness, and pulling back husks of corn to get a better look at the cob. And then it hit me - These people were putting more effort into selecting their produce than many of my clients put into selecting their patients! Wait... Selecting their patients? Of course! After all, what is marketing but a form of patient selection? You tell the world what you have to offer in your marketing, and the people who like what they see, end up coming in. It just makes sense that the way you craft your marketing message, the way you position your practice, will have a HUGE impact on who comes in, doesn't it? In an even more specific sense, the patients in your practice that you choose to market to (if you choose to market to them) are also selected by you - in this case, they've been selected as patients you're trying to keep with your internal marketing. How selective are you? When you're shopping for produce, do you just grab what's on top of the bin? Or do you spend a bit of time to find the GOOD produce, rather than hoping what you picked will turn out all right? When you're marketing for new patients - Or to your existing patients - Do you market purposefully, or indiscriminately? Do you put in a bit of work up front to attract patients who will stay with you, who will follow your treatment plans, and in general be a joy to work with? Or do you just hope that you'll get them... somehow? "Best" and "Worst" patient models Do you know which new patients are most likely to have 30% more visits than average? Do you know which new patients are likely to have 25% FEWER visits than average? Questions like these are the core of patient modeling. The idea is simple - If you look at all of your patients who you consider your "best" patients, and contrast them with the group you consider to be your "worst" patients, you can find the areas where the two groups differ significantly. Please note - When I use terms like "best" or "worst", I'm not implying a value judgment – I’m sure all of your patients are wonderful human beings. "Best" and "Worst" can be thought of as "most (least) profitable", or "Easiest (hardest) to work with" or any other measure you'd like to compare & be able to predict. Putting the model together Okay, so let's assume you've got a model of your best & worst patients, and you realize the following: The best patients will have15 more visits over their active lifetime than the 'average' patient. They tend to be older than 45 years of age, live within a 7 mile radius of your practice, and almost without exception, they never let more than 5 days pass between visits for their first 10 visits. The worst patients have 10 fewer visits than the 'average' patient. They are under age 25, live within a 10 mile radius, and they let upto 10 days pass between appointments over their first 10 visits. What do you do with this new information? Putting the model to work Well, the first thing that seems obvious is that you'd want to put as much marketing money & energy as possible into attracting people over 45 years of age who live within a 7 mile radius of your practice. Additionally, when new patients join, it would make sense to keep tabs on how long is passing between visits - and encouraging these patients to book all of their visits within 5 days of their previous visit. You'd do these things, of course, because you want to do everything in your power to re-create the "model" patient - In other words, to set up the circumstances so that most of your new patients are similar to your best patients. This is especially important in those cases where you do NOT have an unlimited budget, or unlimited time to work. It's especially important when you have to make decisions on where to use your resources. Selecting only the best By making use of statistical models of your practice, you not only get a good idea of what is happening - you also see what you can do to get the best results. By taking the little bit of extra time and effort to make use of these models, you can see some incredible things start to happen in your practice. Or, you can end up going home with a crate full of bruised apples... Want to learn more? Patient Modelling is one of the many strategies covered in Real World Growth Strategies for Your Practice – an exciting new marketing program for Chiropractors. To find out more, e-mail info@svachiro.com Did you find this useful? Why not send it on to friends and colleagues and share the knowledge with others. Alternatively you can reprint these tips in your own website or newsletter, but please include the following information: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shawn Veltman is a marketing consultant and the creator Of the highly acclaimed ‘Real World Growth Strategies’ program for Chiropractors. To find out more, e-mail info@svachiro.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------
The latest trend way in which celebrities to make the most of their stardom is to release a perfume that is endorsed with their beautiful faces. The perfume industry in the UK is massive and perfume manufacturers and celebrities both stand to make a lot of money if they manage to create and market a perfume that sells well. It is said that celebrity perfumes comprise a third share of the whopping 255 million pounds a year industry and it is no wonder that every celebrity under the sun is trying to scoop a piece for themselves.
It has even been stated that one in five young people in the UK own a perfume that has been endorsed by a celebrity. As a result the market has been flooded with perfumes that have been branded with a celebrity and many of these perfume celebrities appear to be dubious choices. There are some really bizarre celebrity perfume endorsements and here are the best and the worst.
Sublime:
Katie Price - Jordan
Katie Price's perfume 'stunning' held top spot on the national sales figures for months. The perfume attracted a mass following that wanted to emulate the ex page three model and music performer. Following a successful book release and an even more successful fly on the wall documentary series about her life with husband Peter Andre the perfume flew of the shelves and represented an excellent move my the perfume manufacturers.
Kate Moss
Kate Moss has long been the UK's favourite model and it appears that there is little she can do to damage her popularity. Despite accusations of drug taking and a fiery relationship with Pete Doherty she has still remained popular with the general public and whereas many celebrities have crumbled under the close scrutiny of the press she has come out smelling of roses and maintained her image as a true English rose.
Christina Aguilera
Another extremely popular perfume took the success of the talented American singer and made her even more money. The provocative scent was said to emulate Christina's playful sexiness and was extremely well received by fans. Another excellent choice by the marketing men.
The ridiculous:
Jade Goody
Why anybody bought a perfume endorsed by the notorious Jade goody is beyond me. It was sold with the literature that stated that the perfume was "sweet and enduring - just like Jade". Titled Shh... the perfume did sell and made quite a bit of money. Proof that people will buy anything because let's face it on the face of it smelling like Jade goody does not on the face of it sound too appealing.
Cliff Richard
The aging music sensation has in his career been the face of two perfumes. The thought of wanting to smell or be associated with this sometimes cringe worthy crooner baffles me but nevertheless the perfumes titled, devil woman and miss you nights did sell fairly successfully. Especially surprising bearing in mind that the perfumes cost around 15 pounds per bottle.
Donald Trump
Unsatisfied with his billions of dollars the comb over sporting business tycoon Donald trump decided to release a perfume in 2004. I struggle to imagine why anyone would want to be so intimately associated with the man but nevertheless the perfume was marketed with a price tag of 60 dollars for a bottle. The marketing blurb stated that people wanted to know him on "every level". I for one found it rather unbelievable.
Both Shawn Veltman & Shaun Parker are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Shawn Veltman has sinced written about articles on various topics from Anger Management, Celebrities. . Shawn Veltman's top article generates over 1900 views. to your Favourites.
Shaun Parker has sinced written about articles on various topics from Online Marketing, Auto Insurance and Wedding Bells. Shaun Parker is an expert on and fragrances. To find out more visit DM Fragrances. Shaun Parker's top article generates over 246000 views. to your Favourites.