It has been suggested by many critics that clothes can change society’s ideas of sex, gender and the roles of men and women. Rouse (1989) suggests that fashion and clothing do not reflect already established ideals of gender identity. However some critics propose that fashion and clothing follows strict basic ideas of masculinity and femininity. This essay plans to investigate the different ideas that critics have produced on fashion and identity, and see if Rouse’s idea of clothing being ‘part of the process’ can be applied to examples of conventional and inverted fashion. It also plans to look at the argument that by not conforming to gendered clothes of a person’s sex, that person has really escaped their gender identity.
It has been suggested that fashion is composed of 3 elements; the principle of conspicuous waste, the principle of conspicuous leisure and the principle of up to datedness where waste does not serve human life (Veblen 1992). This idea supports the Marxist idea that fashion only appears when society is so well organised that it produces more than the minimum needed to survive thus this surplus is suggested to show itself in the form of fashion where clothing is concerned.
(Braudel 1981) can be seen to support Rouse’s theory by his own idea that fashion began by noblemen, squires and the bourgeoisie wearing tunics ‘so tight that they revealed what modesty bids us to hide.’ The reason for doing this can be seen as a show of male masculinity thus creating an unconscious link between this way of dressing and their power in society as men and as the Elite ruling class. (Wilson 1985) suggests that it began in the 14th Century with the changing of a series of styles that was determined by the Royal court right up until the 18th Century.
The idea that women’s fashion in the 19th Century demonstrates the wearer’s ‘abstinence from productive employment’ supports the idea that fashion helps and is part of the process of creating an identify. This can be seen by the fact women wore bonnets, long skirts long hair that prevented and restricted their movement to a minimum, thus the idea that they were dependant on men was strengthened and their position in society.
It suggests that fashion underlines sexuality so when clothes are worn to produced gender bending ideals it makes the majority feel threatened. He also thinks that exaggerated standards of beauty ‘can be disempowering and even offensive’. My first example (see appendix 1) is Christina Aguilera at the Music awards in Edinburgh 2003. The clothes she chose to wear to this event do not reflect conventional ideas of femininity, and for this she has been criticised by the magazine. Her first outfit is a torn tie-dyed dress and seems to be ‘Tasteful’ due to the fact it is a dress and reflects the gender identity allocated conventionally to it. In total contrast the next outfit is very domineering. It consists of leather trousers a bra and a little lace top. In contrast to the last outfit she wears her hair up as apposed to wearing it naturally. In wearing this she is creating an aggressive masculine image however, the magazine writer has mocked her by saying she has ‘forgotten her top’ suggesting that what she wears is not acceptable in society as it does not reflect her sexuality. The next outfit creates a strange image for her. We suppose it is a female one as she is in a skirt; however this outfit goes completely against convention and makes the viewer slightly uneasy as we try to guess what identity she is trying to convey. This could be seen as Wilson’s idea of exaggerated standards of beauty. In her next outfit her image again has undergone a complete change. She is in trousers which do add an n image of dominance it is toned down by the neutral colour of it. However the top with it reflects femininity by the fact it has a bow, which is quite a feminine idea or has been allocated female identity. In contrast the next outfit uses the same colour as the previous shirt, in a way that exaggerates femininity. However it is paired with a pair of trouser s that create a very masculine image. The fact that she does not reflect a set gender in her clothes again or the viewer is slightly uncomfortable. In her next outfit seems to create a gothic image that the magazine takes the piss out of perhaps because it does not reflect female gender identity. This is in contrast to the last outfits she wears which do create and conform to the identity of a conventional woman, however the last one in particular is again a very extreme version of this thus the magazine calls it ‘ridiculous’.
It can be said then that the clothes Christina Aguilera wears on this night does create a certain gender identity, however whether we as viewers accept her decisions to wear the clothes depends on whether the reflect already existing gender identity in a way which is not excessively extreme. It can also be said that she is trying to escape the false and constricting ideology of feminism. She is in a way reversing gender roles by wearing trousers
Archery and the techniques behind it are a passionating device. Theoretically modern archery equipment can be made from accuracy and a safety aspect. From bows and arrows to crossbows, Fingerguards there is no doubt that archery has came along way. From equipment from the past to the modern day archery has something for everyone, Beginner to expert.
In todays equipment, We probably see a lot of stuff that would be different to the archer of old.
Let us first take a look at the bow as an archers equipment piece. The bow itself cannot be judged by a novice by its appearance alone, It must be looked at from all aspects. It must be looked at from many in dices, A smooth bow, That looks to be conventionally shaped, Highly polished and spiffy, It may have everything wrong with it and still look good. If your not familiar with bows, Your not going to know if its a good bow or not. In this instance you should probably seek out the help of a professional, Someone who knows what archery equipment should handle like. You may be able to liberally judge some archery equipment by simply seeking out some adverts from various archery equipment manufactures. You however should seek the advice of an experienced Archer. They will be able to guide you to the best for your beginning en devours.
A little about the Bow itself:
The Back ? Should be flat from in cross-section, But convex from end to end of your bow. It is held in shooting so it will face your target.
The Belly ? It is either rounded (In case of old style bows) or will be flat (As is usual in newer modern bows), It is held while shooting and it faces the archer.
The Handle - is usually about four inches of the mid-section of your bow and should be very rigid. This should show a portion or type of rigid material. Leather is a material that has been used for a long time. Some archers bind this section with fishing line, You may also see that sheet cork has become a popular covering.
The Arms and Limbs ? these tend to taper from the handle to tip very rapidly at first, Then much more gradual till they get to around ? inch in diameter where they enter the toward horn tips.
A. The Upper arm usually forms the upper end of your bow, It can be slightly longer than the lower arm. B. The Lower arm usually forms the lower end of your bow.
The Nock ? This is a notch which will hold the string at each end of your bow. It could possibly be cut into the wood or it may be cut into cow-horn tips, Which are usually glued to the ends. These cow-horn tips, These are merely just ornamental devices, These add nothing to the efficiency of the bow itself. But if these are large and bulky, They can greatly harm the efficiency of the bow itself. These usually also add to the cost of the bow, Most better bows will have these features. The Nock, Should be smooth, There should not be any sharp corners, These can cut the string from the bow.
The Arrow plate ? This is a small piece, Usually with a hard substance. Can be horn,fiber,mother-of-pearl, Usually inlaid at the arrow side of the bow right above the handle. This as well is more decorative than would be useful, Since there is not a great deal of wear from the actual arrow. This brings recognition of the upper arm of the bow.
The String ? is usually made of linen, or today this is usually made of a synthetic medium, such as the Dacron B-50, It may also be made in one of two ways. (a) a loop at each end, or (b) a loop at one end and plain at the other, So it may be tied into a timber-hitch so that it fits into the length of the bow.
If its only to read and study about the history of Archery.
It still holds a lot of information and learning potential for your mind to develop on something new.
Get the Cat Scratch Fever, See the potential and learn about Archery today.
Both Sharon White & Shawn Burgy are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Sharon White has sinced written about articles on various topics from Writing, computers and the internet and Careers and Job Hunting. The article was produced by the writer of masterpapers.com.Sharon White is a senior writer and writers’ consultant in wri. Sharon White's top article generates over 246000 views. to your Favourites.