Print Article for : Public And Product Liability

Your Online Guide » Legal Guide » Free Online Legal Advice

[P811]Public And Product Liability

by Ray Henke, Ray

The manufacturer of Digitek, Actavis Totowa LLC, issued a nationwide Class 1 recall of all strengths of Digitek tablets on April 25, 2008. The Class 1 recall was issued on the basis that the product poses a substantial risk of serious injury or death.The Digitek tablets were distributed by UDL Laboratories, under a UDL label and by Mylan Pharmaceuticals, with a ?Bertek? label. For information with regard to
the Digitek litigation The following is a summary of the basis for liability against Activis for the manufacturing defect which is believed to result in patient injury and death. For complete information with regard to the Digitek litigation you may refer to our discussion of the respective merits of class action lawsuits and individual lawsuits against the manufacturer.

Digitek is the Actavis brand name for Digoxin tablets, commonly prescribed as treatment for abnormal heart rhythms and heart failure. The manufacturer issued the Class 1 national recall because Digitek tablets were distributed to pharmacies with double the thickness and it is presumed, twice the indicated dosage of the active ingredient. The Food and Drug administration has received adverse reaction reports of illness and injury resulting from ingestion of Digitek tablets, and many others have come forward across the nation with symptoms typical of digitalis toxicity. Our have arrived at the conclusion that the double strength Digitek tablets pose the serious risk of toxicity, including the risk of death, particularly in patients with renal failure and those who are on dialysis.

It appears from the notice of Class 1 recall that the Digitek manufacturer has acknowledged the manufacturing defect, specifically the inclusion of twice the indicated dosage of the drug, which is also, in our opinion, persuasive evidence of manufacturer negligence. The high dosages of Digitek can result in Digitalis toxicity, which can lead to low blood pressure, cardiac instability, bradycardia, meaning a slow heartbeat, and death, often presenting also with nausea, vomiting,
and dizziness.

Product Liability can be defined as the accountability of the manufacturers along with the distributors regarding the safety of their products. This also incorporates the producers of the parts used in assembling the product, the product assembler or manufacturer, the main distributor and the retailer in which the customer bought the defective product. This further explains their liability for whatever damage that their products would bring to their customers. In this case the manufacturers should follow a strict quality control in the process of producing their products while the distributors should assure the end customers that it is still safe to consume or utilize the said product. Most of the different state laws clearly affirm that any person who has been harmed in consuming or utilizing substandard products may file a product liability suit against the manufacturer or the distributor. These products can also include intangibles, naturals, real estates and writings. For an instance an individual bought a house in a subdivision for his family's shelter and after a few months their house developed cracks in the walls that cause its collapse, the developer of the housing project can be held liable for it.

Claim cases which deals with product liability can be established depending to the extent of negligence, strict liability and/or breach of warranty that was done by the manufacturer or the distributor and also depends on which state jurisdiction the case was filed. A number of U.S. states ratified different product liability laws, which is based on the Uniform Products Liability Act (MUPLA), depending on the needs of their people. This signifies that there is no such federal products liability law. But in all the jurisdictions, the buyer must substantiate the defectiveness of the product that he bought. The types of deficiencies in which the manufacturers and distributors can be held liable are the following:

a.) Design defects which are intrinsic imperfections that is present in the product before it is assembled.

b.) Manufacturing defects which are brought about by the improper construction of the product.

c.) Marketing defects which results from distributors? neglect of providing proper instruction and warnings about the dangers of utilizing the product.

Product liability does not depend on the extent of caution which is strictly followed by the defendant in producing the product but is based on the degree of damage which is inflicted on the end user. If the plaintiff was able to prove that the product he consumed has defects, regardless on how cautious the manufacturers were in the process of producing the product, the defendant can be held liable for all the damages that were incurred by the customer.

On the other hand, product liability claims are quite difficult to prove in court. It also requires a deep understanding about the statutes of the law. To help them out with these cases, the victims are advised to hire competent and skilled lawyers who have the expertise in handling product liability cases and are very much adept about the prevailing product liability law in their state jurisdiction. This is to ensure them of having favorable results in their cases and enable them to acquire damages from the product manufacturers or distributors.

For more information visit the

Article Source : 24 Hour Legal Advice

About Author

Both Ray Henke & Rainier are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.

Ray Henke has sinced written about articles on various topics from Motorola Cell Phone, Mobile Phone Reviews and The Beach Resort. Ray Henke, Principle trial attorney, . Ray Henke's top article generates over 4400 views. to your Favourites.

Rainier has sinced written about articles on various topics from Travel and Leisure, Legal Matters and Employment Law. Rainier used to work in a publishing company as a writer and eventually became an associate editor. He dealt in writing instructional materials for secondary and tertiary students. His passion in writing inspired him to read a lot and subsequently enabled. Rainier's top article generates over 40500 views. to your Favourites.