Web 2.0 definition: a set of social, economic, and technology trends that collectively form the basis for the next generation of the Internet – a more mature, distinct medium characterized by user participation, openness, and network effects:–definition source: O’Reilly Radar, Web 2.0 Principles and Best Practices
Let’s first identify major social, economic, and technology trends that contributed to this transformation of the Internet.
Social Trends:
Idea Generation and Sharing – teaching your associate in a non-competing market (across the country) how to create additional business in his local marketplace, improve the efficiency and economic environment of your industry through idea sharing
Industry Consolidation – Increasing consolidation of information suppliers and network providers has allowed for increased information distribution efficiency
Example: Acquisition of Time Warner by America Online, Acquisition of Scientific Atlanta by Cisco Networks, A T and T joins BellSouth
Technology Trends:
Increase In Technology Adoption - High Speed Usage Increasing in Business (office place) and Consumer (home) Markets. Increasing broadband speeds has led to the consumers’ rapid adoption of multimedia (Audio & Video) usage online. 68% of U.S. online users now use broadband (February ’06, Neilsen/NetRatings).
Where the Web is going:
Web 2.0 is opening up the online market, as the networking environment opens up public idea generation and publishing has become very simple. Organization and globalization of the Internet’s information is beginning to take form at the hands of user interactivity. One major tool pushing the boundaries of online publishing simplicity are application serving sites.
Application Serving Sites & Their Position in the Marketplace
Application serving sites are websites that create a platform for users to contribute data and information. Actual sites are beginning to work as user software creating an environment for user’s to create, post, and edit information. Active and updated information on the Internet creates greater relevancy for a dataset of content.
The Way an Application Serving Site Functions for a User:
Step 1: Login site and create content
Step 2: Publish content to the web
Step 3: Consumers and search engines read and index content
An application serving website sets up structure and guidelines for a user to create a login (identifying the user), profile information (creating demographic data for the network), and then the means to publish additional information satisfying the niche in which the user would like to participate in publishing their information (audio, content, video, and other forms of information).
There are many niche market websites being created to serve niche markets of the Internet’s long tail. If you examine your search engine results, search engines are giving bias to websites that are destinations for people to publish information on the Internet. In Google in particular they are pulling numerous listing results from various sites like Craigslist, MySpace, Yahoo Directory, YouTube, Blogs, and other places people create self published and/or manually organized information. This behavior by the search engines shows the dependence of a more relevant Internet on dynamic information being posted at reliable destination websites.
These application serving websites create social grouping networks allowing for the free exchange of data that is relevant and similar to other existing data on the network. Some networks will even suggest similar groupings to peak a user’s interest.
Search Engine Information Seeking – Hierarchy (Chart 2)
Search engines seek information as follows and index from directory sites, social networking sites, and blogs.
The dynamic capabilities of websites that are programmed and published by web users is allowing search engines to garner updated, organized, and refreshed information at an increased frequency. This information is setup to be preprogrammed into categories making it easier to satisfy a search engines relevancy organization desires. Presorted information receives favored ranking and recognition from the major search engines.
How is this so?
As search engines have grown to find successful business models where they can generate increasing operating revenues, they have invested heavily into the complexity of their vast computer infrastructures. Many of the search engines are programming their computer infrastructure to create a system that can potentially react as fast as the human brain as to its reflex of identifying and organization new information on the Internet. The quicker information can move across the computer networks (synapse) from one computer to another the quicker the web will be able to grow. For example, Google has recruited one of the world’s top neurologists to program the complexity of their search computer systems. Below is a chart to visualize how data flows along the search engine web.
Search engines are exactly what they call themselves, search engines. The question is: what are the search engines searching for?
Many things they may be searching for include:
Who is linking to your site?
What is on your site?
Where is your site listed?
When your site was last visited?
Why are people visiting your site?
How many people visit your site?
The thought application being used to organize search results by various search engines:
Who is the searcher searching for the information?
Are they doing it looking for common information?
What type of information are they searchers looking for related to certain topics?
Is the website information relevant to the extension of a domain name?
When was the last time a site was updated or visited?
As search engines continue to increase in complexity so will the rewards associated with being found on the search engine results.
Integrating Your Media Mix to Your Online Presence
Now that we have established the dynamics of the search engines and computer applications feeing them the question is how to integrate your various media into an overall Internet presence. If your office uses multiple media to market (audio, newsletter, video, and more) you can synergize your data for a more concrete marketing message through an overall well organized and strategize web presence. Another added benefit to getting your marketing material exposure on the Internet is that consumers will become increasingly interactive with your brand and may give you feedback as to how they feel about your media and marketing. You can then interpret the data as you please and use it increase the consumer friendliness of your data.
The effects of Web 2.0, the interactive web, allow you to distribute your information rapidly and very cost effectively. More is better in this market, and your distribution costs are very low for online compared to traditional media.
Many people look at old media as a very effective medium for marketing which it is, but new media allows you to create a greater dimension of your marketing campaign and a destination to pull a visitor in. An effective strategy to using your old media to integrate with your new media is to use a catchphrase like:
Visit our website to see the beautiful work we have performed on our patients
Visit our website to learn additional information about our services
Visit our website to see a video of what to expect when you come to our office for a consultation
The list goes on as to catchphrases you can use to draw visitors into your online presence, be sure to integrate old media marketing into what your website has to offer consumers. Once you get a visitor to your website you have achieved half the battle now you need to seal the deal and turn your website visitor into an office visitor.
Asp.net 2.0 Interview Questions
The term Web 2.0 has come to dramatically increased usage over the past few years. Many people have since begun to appropriate this hot new buzzword for their own websites while others are not quite so eager to embrace this new concept, considering it little more than an inappropriately named web-marketing gimmick. It has clearly polarized the web into two opposing camps, of adherents on the one hand and skeptics on the other. Yet in spite of all this-or perhaps because of this-there is still plenty of confusion and controversy surrounding Web 2.0. What is it exactly? And are the changes to the way the Internet has come to be used in recent years really significant enough to warrant this name?
The phrase itself is attributed to O'Reilly media, the company who coined it in 2003. Subsequently, the first Web 2.0 conference, which was held in 2004, brought it into widespread public consciousness. A series if conferences hosted by O'Reilly media has made the term even more popular than ever and facilitated the adoption of it by many industry pundits. The term as it has come to be used by O'Reilly media, refers to what many in the Internet industry perceive to be the second wave of Web-based communities and hosted services, following the first wave of communities which flourished during the initial Internet boom. These web sites encompass social networking sites, wiki sites and folksonomies-all of which share the trait of encouraging and facilitating content collaboration and sharing among its many users.
Perhaps some of the confusion surrounding the use of the tem Web 2.0 stems from the fact that it does not actually signify a change or an update to the technical specification of the World Wide Web as we have come to know it. Instead it more appropriately describes the widespread changes that many systems developers have implemented in the way that they use the existing web platform. The founder of O'Reilly media, Tim O'Reilly has himself termed it a business revolution in the computer industry that was caused by the move to the Internet as a platform. He further goes on to say that attempts to come to grips with the rules for success on that new platform is an integral part of Web 2.0.
On his own blog, which can be found at http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/10/web_20_compact_definition.html, O'Reilly wrote a compact yet more detailed definition of the term and refers to Web 2.0 as his view of the network as a platform that encompasses all the devices that are connected to it. According to him, Web 2.0 applications are the applications that are in the best position to take advantage of most of the inherent benefits of that platform. The means by which they can achieve this is through the delivery of software to the public that is continuously updated and generates its content through the merging of data from many different sources, which may include the individual end user. The Web 2.0 applications in turn generate their own data as well as services in a way that other users can readily mix according to their own needs. This paradigm clearly goes beyond the nature of Web 1.0 into a network that is built upon as O'Reilly calls it “(an) architecture of participation”. The end result is a richer web experience for the end user by way of applications that actually get better the more it is used.
To further illustrate the differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, it may help to view Web 1.0 as primarily focused on the connectivity between computers and a way to make technology work better for computers, while Web 2.0 strives to link people together and make technology work better for people.
While some people would disagree with this last illustration-and indeed claim that the opposite is actually more accurate-the fact remains that the Web 2.0 is increasingly reliant on the varied input from its users and the dividing line between people and technology is becoming more and more blurred as time goes on.
While computer mediation is still-and will probably remain for the next foreseeable future-an integral part of the new paradigm, the utilization of the collective input from its users will bring about a continuous improvement of the particular application based on the same users' interaction with it.
The clear shift in focus from “technology” to “people” is perhaps no better illustrated by the change in technological demands from the '90s to the present. While many users previously focused their requests on solutions to very specific technological demands, the overwhelming clamor nowadays is for applications that allow for far more end user intervention and input.
The controversy rages on as to the validity of the term Web 2.0, but by all indications it seems that it is here to stay.
Both Zach Hoffman & Mikhail Tuknov are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Zach Hoffman has sinced written about articles on various topics from Site Promotion, Marketing and About My Space. Zach Hoffman is interested in helping people.To learn more about web 2.0, , social networking visit:. Zach Hoffman's top article generates over 22200 views. to your Favourites.
Mikhail Tuknov has sinced written about articles on various topics from Search Engine Marketing, Site Promotion and Computers and The Internet. Mikhail Tuknov is a providing web site search engine optimization (SEO), pay per click (PPC) management and web analytics services.. Mikhail Tuknov's top article generates over 60500 views. to your Favourites.
Chances Of Winning Powerball Following a simple strategy like the one outlined above will help you increase your chances of winning the big ones and will give you maximum return for the time and energy you invest in your games