Class action lawsuits give individuals the power to match up against corporations. Class actions can be really successful if there are a large group of class members who have all sustained a relatively small loss sustained as a result of corporate criminality. The legal costs for individual members to file separately would be high. And the heavy burden on the court system would be excessive. The purpose of class actions is to give a convenient and economic solution for mass tort lawsuits.
Class action lawsuits can be brought before the United States federal courts, as governed by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, when the suit involves class members, with common issues, across state lines. They can also be brought before the federal court if the case is connected with federal law. Class action lawsuits can also be brought before state courts. Different states may have differences in civil law and so may need individual attention or through multi-district litigation. Federal courts are more hostile to class actions than their state counterparts.
The 'class' consists of the group that have incurred damage or have been wronged by a businesses illegal actions or products. Examples include faulty products such as medical device defects or antitrust and securities lawsuits.
To start a class-action suit, a group must first be first certified as a 'class' by the court. Before certifying the court will decide if there are a large number of plaintiffs that it would otherwise burden the court to try them individually. They must also decide whether this group has common issues and that the claims of the class members must be typical of those of the putative class. The group filing the class action must be adequately representing the class. If these criteria are successfully met then the class action can be certified. Upon certification all members are notified and have the opportunity to opt out. Usually only a few members of the class need be present at the trial. Upon conclusion any award will be divided up between all members of the class. Often these types of lawsuits are settled out of court. Class actions are rarely resolved quickly and can often take years to come to a conclusion.
The class action system is not without its detractors. The system is blamed for epidemic levels of litigation abuses in state courts. The detractors claim that juries and judges are in collusion and team up to award large settlements. The end result is an increase in consumer prices.
Class actions are a thorn in the side of large corporations. The help give the little guy a much needed voice. They also help reduce pressure on the legal system. However they do have their detractors who are against the systems and suggest that lawyers are the ones who are truly winning by abusing the system.
Class A Action Lawsuit
In July 2007, a New Jersey man lost his healthy 31 year old wife to a stroke. The cause of her death wasn’t clogged arteries or illness. Doctors suspect her death was the result of NuvaRing blood clots. The produce is a new type of birth control that has only been on the market for a short time. However, this death and dozens of other problems have led some to consider filing NuvaRing class action lawsuits against the manufacturer.
At the basis of these NuvaRing class action lawsuits’ claims is the idea that patients were misled about the potential risks involved in taking this form of birth control. Although blood clots have always been a potential risk of traditional birth control pills, the NuvaRing blood clots seem to be a more serious problem and have led to other deaths, as well as amputations and other life-threatening complications.
One example was a North Carolina woman who reported that her sister had also recently had a stroke which left her paralyzed completely on one side of her body. Her sister was only 29 years old, and her doctors are pointing the finger at the NuvaRing blood clots as the cause of her current situation. No one probably told her that choosing this form of birth control could cause her to end up in a wheelchair for the rest of her life.
The most ironic part about the NuvaRing blood clots and one of the reasons why the NuvaRing class action lawsuits are important is that this birth control method was developed for the primary reason of having fewer side effects. The research had begun in the 1980’s but when the product was released in 2002 as a birth control option the testing was limited. Had more research been done on the potential serious side effects many of these women would not have had a stroke.
Unfortunately, even some of the research that did arise from the relatively short lived testing found the potential for these NuvaRing blood clots. One of the birth control chemicals in the product was found to cause a two-fold increase in the risk of the development of venous blood clots. These are the most dangerous clots because they can travel to the brain and cause a stroke, as well as paralysis and blindness.
Both James Johnstone & Jhoana Cooper are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
James Johnstone has sinced written about articles on various topics from Class Action. James Johnstone writes for the Class Action Lawsuit news and resource site. Visit for more information.. James Johnstone's top article generates over 6600 views. to your Favourites.
Jhoana Cooper has sinced written about articles on various topics from Football, Jokes and Business and Finance. If someone you love has been affected by , investigate your right to start. Jhoana Cooper's top article generates over 823000 views. to your Favourites.
Cheap Calls From China Arrange for some agent or third party in China which will ensure quality check on your part before your order is shipped to you