Children have been in the news a lot these days. Rarely, however, has it been for positive reasons. For two months now, the nightly newscasts have brought us an apparently unending list of death from the Middle East. The Israelis and the Palestinians are killing each other again, and the sight is far from pretty. The most shocking aspect of the latest uprising, though, is the fact that a large number of the Palestinians who have been killed were children or juveniles. Their deaths have, once again, highlighted the fact that people under 18 years of age are regularly being used in military conflicts all over the world. Their passing has also raised a number of questions which governments and campaigners against the use of child soldiers have long been struggling with. For instance, is one person's freedom fighter always another person's terrorist? Does that old clich? still apply when the person in question is not an adult? Or should children's lives be held to a different standard from adults when one looks at the issue of 'proper conduct' during military hostilities?
Last January, the international community replied to such questions by agreeing that children should be treated differently. The United Nations Working Group on Children in Armed Conflict agreed to raise the international minimum age for active participation in military hostilities from 15 to 18 years. It also agreed to do a way with conscription for anyone under 18 years of age. Subsequently, on 25 May, the agreement was adopted by the UN General Assembly as the Optional Protocol to the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child. Unfortunately, although the Optional Protocol has raised the minimum standard by which children in conflict zones should be treated by states, there is little in the document that appeals to guerrilla groups or other non-state forces. This is the case because the new agreement prohibits any form of recruitment of children by non-state armed groups, but allows states to take on voluntary recruits from the age of 16. According to Rory Mungoven, the Co-ordinator for the London-based Coalition to Stop Child Soldiers, it will prove virtually impossible to properly protect children caught up in armed combat until this 'double standard' is done away with.
Thankfully, groups like Radda Barnen/Save the Children, Sweden, have pledged to 'continue to advocate [for] the abolition of the recruitment of children into any armed force.' Still, as the current situation in Gaza and the West Bank illustrates, campaigners against the use of child soldiers have a hard time ahead of them. Israel, for one, has not signed the Optional Protocol and is in no apparent hurry to do so. Nor does it show any willingness to switch its response to the current Palestinian uprising from a military reaction to a more appropriate police-based response, as Amnesty International has urged it to do. As a result, Palestinian children and juveniles continue to be regularly shot in the head or upper body by Israeli soldiers -- who are evidently being told to treat youngsters throwing rocks with the same 'respect' as adult fighters with bombs or machine guns. Yasser Arafat, meanwhile, continues to use children as bargaining chips in his high stakes game of poker with Israel. Granted, he doesn't have complete control of the factions in his own Fatah movement, let alone the more radical elements amongst the Palestinian community. However, as someone who aspires to be the first head of a Palestinian state, he should be fighting for his people's future by doing a lot more to keep Palestinian children away from the action than he has done so far.
Ultimately, in the Middle East and elsewhere, the only solution to ending the use of child soldiers by any combatant is to continue the political pressure for change. This will take time, considerable effort, and the willingness of all parties concerned to sign the Optional Protocol, and share their experiences and views about this problem. Continual research and monitoring will be essential to ensure that states who have signed and ratified the agreement do not rest on their laurels or start to backslide on their promises. Greater oversight of rebel and other armed groups will also be required. Finally, the general public, in the countries that sell arms internationally, will need to tell their governments that weaponry must not be sold to combatants who do not, at the very least, keep children above the fray.
Although only the US and Somalia have not signed the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 300,000 children are today serving as soldiers in armed conflicts. On January 30 2003 The UN Security Council explicitly listed countries who violated their international obligations: Afghanistan, Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Liberia and Somalia. A UN report also mentioned the use of child soldiers in several countries not on the Security Council's agenda, including Burma, Colombia, Sri Lanka and Uganda. The Secretary General is to enter dialogue with all these countries and develop "clear and time bound action plans" to end their use of child soldiers.
Death Of A Valentine
A lot of companies try to distance themselves from the word "sales" because they know that for some people the word alone conjures up feelings of sitting in some pressure-cooker car dealership or time-share presentation.
So now, rather than having salespeople, we have important-sounding titles like Territory Manager, Client Liaison, and Account Manager (but not as creative as nail technician or sanitation engineer.) Maybe my manager thought that when I visited with a new prospect they would take one look at my card and breathe a sigh of relief: "Whew! I don't have to worry about any hard closes with this guy--he's a 'marketing rep'!"
It wasn't until after I left the company that I gave any further consideration as to why they chose "marketing representative" as the title for their salespeople . Was it merely some sort of associative bait and switch? Or something more troubling: maybe they actually thought that cold-calling random businesses day after day and begging for appointments was "marketing". It is, in fact, a form of marketing just like a stagecoach is a form of transportation and a loincloth is a form of clothing.
Having stayed in the industry long after I had moved on, Tim, a fellow "marketer" started his own technology consulting business back in '04 after his employer went bankrupt. He and a couple partners picked up right where they left off, continuing to service the same clients they had been working with at their old employer. They expect to generate around 1.7 million in revenue this year--not bad for a firm with 3 employees that didn't even exist 3 1/2 years ago.
"I'm getting ready to hire of couple of new sales reps and I'd like your opinion," he said when he called a while back. "I'm going to hire an inside sales rep to pound the phones and uncover new leads, and an outside rep to meet with companies face to face and close those leads. The only issue is my outside guy has been with a competitor for the last 5 years and has a non-compete agreement that locks him out of the state for 2 years. I can get him to call on companies outside of this territory, but he won't be able to sell to any of his old clients--he'll have to generate all new business."
"How many inbound leads are you getting?" I asked. "Do you have enough to keep him busy?"
"A ton!" he said. "I probably have 50 different opportunities I could be pursuing right now--to be honest, I can't even keep up with them all. But I'm not giving them to him--that would be like handing him free money."
"So let me go this straight: you expect a guy that's developed a base of business over the last 5 years to start from scratch calling on companies that have never heard of you, and you have no intentions of providing him with any existing clients or leads?" It was all coming back to me.
"Essentially 'yes'," he said sheepishly.
I'm not big on giving unsolicited advice, but he asked for my opinion, and over the next hour I explained to him why I thought the whole scenario was a bad idea. "Tim, you've got a highly successful business despite the fact you're not doing any marketing whatsoever. You're situation is unique because you guys were able to pick up highly profitable clients as a result of your old company's marketing efforts. Now you're in a situation where you need to start generating new clients and you're trying to do it the same boneheaded way we did it 15 years ago. From your years of experience in this industry, what do you think the ratio is of bad sales reps to those that are successful long-term?"
"Probably 20 to 1," he said without hesitation.
"Then look at it this way: you're going to have to go through 19 sales people before you find one that's going to be worth your time. I could name a half-dozen marketing ideas you could be doing right now to generate new opportunities: start with your website, which by the way, needs a complete overhaul. You're in the technology industry yet you don't invest a dime in online (or offline for that matter) advertising. You could be putting out a catalog, writing a blog, hosting technology forums, a million things. Why don't you take the same money you were going to pay the telemarketer and put it into some of these initiatives that put you in front of those people that are already looking for your services?"
Much has changed in the last 15 - 20 years, but a lot has stayed the same. As a rule of thumb: people do not like being pressured into buying stuff they don't need and when they DO need something they'll go find it themselves.
The Internet has dramatically changed the role of the salesperson, particularly when it comes to B2B sales. Buyers no longer have to rely solely on salespeople to educate and bring them up to speed on their products and services; they have all the information they need at their fingertips. Salespeople should be spending the majority of their time focused on those prospects that have already expressed in interest in your offerings, not courting those people naive enough to fall for "I'm going to be in your area next week and wanted to see if I could stop by for a few minutes. How does Tuesday at 10 a.m. sound?"
Oh, and in case you're wondering: that conversation with Tim took place over three months ago. He went ahead and hired both sales reps and to date, they have jointly delivered $9k worth of revenue verses a quota of $50k.
He called yesterday wanting to know what day of the week was best to fire salespeople.
Both Davinos Greeno & Thad Greer are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Davinos Greeno has sinced written about articles on various topics from Babies, Lose Weight and Health. Davinos Greeno works for the directory which sells plus we. Davinos Greeno's top article generates over 22200 views. to your Favourites.
Thad Greer has sinced written about articles on various topics from Flirting Tips, Work From Home and Family Concerns. Thad Greer is an Executive Recruiter that specializes in identifying top sales, marketing, and operations talent nationwide. His website
Best Amount Of Sleep The main channels for this are the Internet and the local video stores, which notify them when these DVDs are scheduled to appear. The most fanatic fans even book a movie before it is released.