Those extra requirements can quickly morph into "customer hassles" -- the kinds of aggravations that make consumers feel mildly annoyed all the way to really angry or stupid. And unless they're very unhappy, customers often leave quietly, without telling us why. They simply vote with their wallets, taking their business elsewhere.
In contrast, to compete successfully today, we need to do just the opposite. We need to create "raving fans" -- people who can't stop telling their friends, family, and colleagues just how wonderful our products and services are. How should we go about doing this?
Without easy-to-use products and services, it's hard to attract raving fans. This article, the first in a series, takes a look at two of the factors -- simplicity and built-in guidance -- that contribute greatly to customer satisfaction.
Can We Go Down the Up Escalator?
You may have heard results from marketing surveys in which consumers are asking for simpler products with fewer features and shorter learning curves. Even if you haven't been aware this particular trend, ask yourself -- do I need more complicated appliances? Or even one more feature on my telephone?
A recent article in US News and World Report on taming technology bemoaned the fact that the same electronic gizmos we depend on daily are often the source of our frustrations. Gadgets are smaller and cost less, but they don't necessarily work the way we want them to. Why? They're much too complicated! Ironically, the more manufacturers feel compelled to add frilly, complex features, the more consumers feel compelled to buy them. The antidote, the article goes on to say, is returning to basics by striving for ease of use and dependability. Similarly, if we all avoid the temptation to heap on fancy features and functions in our offerings, we'll have a much better chance of keeping customers loyal, happy, and returning for more.
Example 1: Simplicity Lost
Enter a telling story about a hypothetical company called Word Style Leader (or WSL for short). WSL's troubles followed an all-too-familiar pattern. For nine years, it successfully made software that customers bought in droves. During that blissful time, WSL's products reflected simple, clean features and interfaces. WSL did not push frilly functionality, but instead offered steady, incremental improvements that were consistent in appearance and easy for customers to master.
But because of that success, WSL accelerated the pace of adding enhancements and options to its star product to stay ahead of the competition. One day, though, this strategy began to backfire. After a certain point, WSL's software had become too tricky -- too complex for the average consumer to use. Its latest Internet-savvy upgrade was whizzy; however, the interface was now jumbled with far too many confusing choices. Even existing customers couldn't recognize familiar tasks.
Business declined. Yet WSL stayed oblivious to the symptoms and their causes. Why was that? It didn't probe its own customer satisfaction, conduct marketing surveys, or study consumer trends.
Unfortunately, like many companies, WSL remained committed to a mistaken belief that perpetually adding deluxe features would increase customer happiness as well as revenue. Consequently, no one at WSL ever figured out the bottom-line truth: Its own customer preferences echoed the simpler tastes revealed by recent consumer studies. In its customers' eyes, less was unquestionably more.
Example 2: Popularity Gained
Wherever simplification leaves off, built-in guidance can help make the remaining tasks a breeze. In a software product, for example, such guidance can come in the form of tightly interwoven tips and hints, overviews, demonstrations, wizards, and other systematic interactions that intelligently aid people in achieving their goals.
An excellent example of customer guidance lives in a certain popular U.S. income tax preparation software package. Its step-by-step process leads users through a series of queries that helps them perform each task correctly, even if they don't know the first thing about the U.S. tax code. Systems like this can greatly reduce or eliminate customer training and often avoid the need for professional tax assistance. It's no wonder that consumers rave about this product!
So, What Should We Aim For?
Below are four things to consider with regard to ease of use in your offerings:
1. Are your products or services designed as simply as possible?
Have you researched what customers truly want and need, resisting the pressure or temptation to overload your offerings with "too much stuff"? Have the interfaces been developed and tested with ease of use in mind?
2. Do your offerings support your customers' main objectives?
Assuming that you've removed hassles and annoying busywork from your offerings, does what remains help support your customers' real-life needs -- the things people were trying to accomplish before they ever turned to your wares for help? Do customers receive just-in-time assistance on completing each step?
3. Can customers explore deeper features when they're ready?
Can they expose additional layers of information, such as tutorials, at their discretion? Are the tutorials directly linked to the tasks at hand?
4. Is every element of the system compatible and complete?
Will customers see the same terminology, consistent features and naming conventions, and predictable behavior throughout the system?
In conclusion, keeping your offerings simple and consistent, while simultaneously supporting whatever people are really trying to accomplish, should lead to years of customer gratitude and loyalty.
Copyright 2006 Adele Sommers
Easy Use Digital Camera
In Part 1 of this series, we explored a formula for customer happiness -- through the lens of what makes customers unhappy. One reason for customer frustration is that over time, many products and services tend to evolve, eventually becoming too complicated and difficult to use. In Part 2 (this article), we'll probe more deeply into how to reverse this trend by simplifying what we have to offer.
A Quick Review of the Ease-of-Use Basics
In Part 1, we recognized that consumers expect our offerings to work exactly as advertised. Yet our products and services can introduce complex requirements and burdens of their own, some of which can even prevent customers from doing what they were trying to accomplish in the first place! When this occurs, buyers not only fail to become "raving fans," they often take their business elsewhere without ever telling us why.
We then explored four ease-of-use considerations:
-- Designing offerings to function as simply as possible, without adding busywork
-- Striving to support customers' primary goals, ideally through built-in guidance
-- Enabling customers to explore more complex features only when they're ready
-- Making all elements of a product or system fully compatible and consistent
Where Do You Draw the Line?
Where should you draw the line between simplicity and complexity when creating or enhancing your products or services? Especially when customers are asking for new enhancements left and right -- demanding endless features and options -- how do you know when it's time to rein in the expansion and revert back to basics? Isn't the goal to give customers everything they ask for? Won't that make them happy?
The easiest way I can think of to draw the line between simplicity and complexity is along two relative dimensions:
-- Making sure the system is easy to use from your customers' point of view, such as by repeatedly testing the interface design with representative users.
-- Making sure the system is easy to maintain and test from your point of view. Unfortunately, there's no single alarm bell that goes off to warn everyone that a system has become too complicated to manage. Consider evaluating these angles each time you plan to upgrade your offerings, since over-complexity is a phenomenon that can easily overtake us.
To gain even more insight into this problem from an intriguing point of view, I recommend a book called "Necessary But Not Sufficient" by Eli Goldratt. It's an enjoyable example of a type of writing called "business fiction" -- because it lets fabricated characters explore a puzzling business problem and gradually discover the many sides of the solution. A main theme of this book exposes why an exceedingly competent software development team suddenly cannot figure out how to continue to maintain a highly successful but extremely complex software product.
The team is experiencing this problem because the product had grown over time to contain too much functionality. That situation occurred because (you guessed it!) customers kept asking for more and more features. Each new feature set increased the possible interactions within the system almost exponentially! It thus had become too complex to test or maintain, and equally challenging to use.
That's the problem with complex systems -- they can quickly reach a point at which they contain too many combinations of variables to validate in a lifetime, much less within the time available to release the product.
How Do We Know When Something Is as Easy to Use as Possible?
Often, we may try to think about simplicity and ease of use in terms of some kind of measurement. In that respect, ease of use might mean making something easy to follow from the standpoint of comprehension, for example, such as a reading grade level. If we apply a reading comprehension formula to our documents, we can find out how easily people at a certain grade level can understand them.
While measurements are important tools that offer useful ways to compare things, I would like to raise the bar even higher -- much higher -- even if it sounds idealistic. That is, I would like to have us consider what it would take to make our products or services completely transparent to our customers, as if our offerings could act almost invisibly.
Imagine that each time your customers use your offerings, it's as if they have a personal assistant working the behind the scenes to do whatever the product or service is supposed to do. Imagine that assistant or agent anticipating what each customer needs to have done, and then doing it, practically without being asked!
I realize that's a tall order, and some people will surely feel that you'd need some pretty fancy programming to make anything work so transparently. But the next best thing should sound more achievable -- and that is, making our offerings as self-guiding and foolproof as possible.
In conclusion, drawing the line between simplicity and complexity can be difficult to do. Simplification brings many rewards. But if you must add more complexity, consider whether you can either hide it elegantly, or guide people through it effortlessly and painlessly. Let these be your next major goals, and I guarantee you'll applaud the results!
Adele Sommers has sinced written about articles on various topics from Blogging, Site promotion and Retirement. Adele Sommers, Ph.D. is the creator of the "Straight Talk on Boosting Business Performance" success formula. To learn more about her tools and resources and sign up for other free tips like these, visit her site at. Adele Sommers's top article generates over 14800 views. to your Favourites.
Charm Bracelet And Necklace Some women choose charms in sterling silver or gold only. Others create colorful combinations to match their favorite outfits