Start by listening to figure out the source of the disagreement. Is it an issue of fact (you wrote that the employee received a customer satisfaction score of 79 but the employee says that his score was actually 83), or is a matter of judgment (you wrote that the employee's customer service skills were unsatisfactory; she feels that her skills are terrific)? If the disagreement involves an issue of fact, get the facts and make any corrections necessary. If it's a matter of judgment, ask the employee for additional evidence. Then determine whether that evidence is weighty enough to cause you to change your mind, revise your judgment, and amend the rating that you assigned on the employee's performance review.
Most of the time, you have a reasonably good understanding of the areas where disagreements are likely to pop up in the course of the performance review discussion. Before beginning the discussion, re-read the review you wrote and try to spot the areas where you and the individual may not seem eye-to-eye. Then ask yourself, "What am I going to say when George disagrees with my assessment that his performance on the Thompson project just barely met expectations?" If you've taken to time to review the appraisal you've written for potential hot spots, and given some thought to how you'll respond, you're much less likely to be caught off guard.
During the employee performance review discussion, start with your higher ratings and move toward the lower ones. Be prepared to give additional examples besides the ones you've included on the formal written appraisal. Refer back to the informal conversations you have had with the individual over the course of the year.
Of course, if you haven't had on-going, informal performance review discussions with the individual over the course of the appraisal period, then it's much more likely that disagreements will surface during the review. That's one more reason for scheduling periodic, "How's it going?" discussions with each person on your team.
As soon as a disagreement pops up, switch into active listening mode. "Active listening" involves allowing the other person to clarify both the facts and feelings about an issue so there's nothing left under the surface. For example, using phrases as simple as, "Tell me more . . ." or, "What else can you share with me about that . . . ?" or, "Really . . . ?" can encourage people to talk more about their perceptions. Simply nodding without saying anything encourages people to expand on what they have said. It's not at all unlikely that the employee, allowed a sufficient chance to think aloud about what you have written, will end up saying, "Yeah, I guess I see what you mean."
In dealing effectively with employee performance review disagreements, remember what your objective in the discussion is - and what it isn't. Your objective in a performance review discussion is not to gain agreement. It is to gain understanding. If the employee agrees with you, that's great. But particularly if your appraisal is a tough-minded assessment of the fact the Charlie's contribution toward achieving your department's objectives was only mediocre, you'll probably never get him to agree. That's OK. What you want is for him to understand why you evaluated his performance the way you did, even if his personal opinion is different.
Finally, if you have several employee performance reviews to deliver, don't start with the individual whose performance was the worst and where disagreements are the most likely to arise. Start with the easiest - your best performer - and move toward the more difficult. In this way, you'll build your skills and become more comfortable with the performance review process. Remember the advice that John Dillinger, the 1930's public-enemy #1, once provided: "Before you rob your first bank, knock off a couple of gas stations."
Employee Performance Review Examples
Managers talk with the people on their teams every day. Whatever the topic, most of these conversations happen with no stress, little anxiety, and minimal tension. But when the conversation is about an employee's performance, anxieties often abound. Here are four ways to reduce the tension and defensiveness that too often surround performance evaluations.
1. Don't wait for the meeting to deliver the performance appraisal form.
I worked for large corporations for fifteen years before beginning my consulting career. Every one of those companies ? GE, United Airlines, PepsiCo ? took performance appraisal very seriously. And my bosses at those companies also took their responsibilities for performance evaluation seriously as well. But all of my bosses kicked off the appraisal discussion in a way that was guaranteed to get it off to a bad start. How did they begin? They set up the time for the meeting and then waited until I was sitting across the desk to hand me their completed appraisal form.
At the start of the meeting my boss would give me his appraisal form and I would engage all of my speed-reading skills, whipping through the document as fast as I could to see what he had said about my performance. While I was reading the evaluation (and probably missing some key points in my haste to take everything in) my boss would be behind his desk, pretending to work, but in truth trying to gauge how I was reacting to the evaluation he had written.
What a terrible way to begin! Don't wait until the meeting starts to give the employee your performance appraisal document. It's far more effective to go up to the employee an hour or so in advance of the meeting, and say something like this: ?Mary, you know we're getting together at two o'clock to go over your performance appraisal. Here it is. Why don't you take some time between now and then to review it? Read it carefully and jot down any questions that you'd like to ask.?
Giving the person the appraisal to review in advance of the meeting can lessen defensiveness. It allows her time to think about what you've written and prevents spur-of-the-moment reactions. You'll usually find that giving the person a chance to read what you've written in advance produces much more effective business discussions.
2. Set a time frame (and give yourself an extra fifteen minutes).
Your discussion of a person's performance evaluation may be one of the most important interactions you'll ever have with that individual; make sure you've allowed enough time. In most cases, an hour should be sufficient to review the appraisal document itself as well as discuss many of the other subjects that often pop up during performance reviews ? development activities, career plans, and future goals and projects. Make certain that the very next activity you've scheduled after finishing the review isn't one that must begin at a set time. If you provide yourself with a little flexibility at the end, you can take the time to wrap up the discussion comfortably.
3. Don't start by discussing the form itself.
Yes, the form is important, but the form simply serves as the formal record of your assessment of how well the individual has done over the past year. Rather than beginning with the first entry on the appraisal form and moving lockstep through the document item-by-item, it's more effective to start by asking a general question that requires the employee's thoughtful consideration: ?Tim, you've had a chance to read the appraisal. Why don't you start by telling me how you feel the past year has gone?? Then listen as the individual responds and continue the discussion from there.
4. Don't fixate on getting the employee to agree with your performance appraisal.
One of the most common questions managers ask me during training sessions involves how they can gain an employee's agreement with what they've written in the performance appraisal, particularly when what they've written isn't entirely favorable. ?Don't try!? is my advice to them.
What is a performance appraisal? It is a formal record of the supervisor's opinion of the quality of the employee's work. Pay attention to the key phrase, ?. . . the supervisor's opinion . . .?
Of course the employee is going to have a different opinion ? all of us believe we're above average. The goal in the performance review discussion is not to gain the employee's agreement, although it is nice if that happens, the goal is to gain the employee's understanding. As long as the employee understands how you came up with the evaluation, you've done your job. Of course, he may disagree (particularly if you've set the bar high and have tough, demanding standards). But don't waste time trying to convince a person that you're right and she's wrong. The important thing is that she understands your expectations and how her performance was assessed.
There's a lot more to conducting good appraisal discussions, of course. But these four tips should make a tough job just a little bit easier.
Dick Grote has sinced written about articles on various topics from Management, Surveys. Dick Grote is one of America's most well-known speakers, authors, and consultants on employee performance reviews. He is the Chairman and CEO of Grote Consulting and the developer of the GroteApproach. Dick Grote's top article generates over 1900 views. to your Favourites.
2008 Economic Stimulus Checks Outside of the capital la Vella these tend to be La Massana and the upcoming village of Anyos, Ordino and Arinsal, although Arinsals nightlife during the ski season early December to late April ten...