In our age of ever-expanding communication possibilities, researchers have been drawn to answer the question of which communication mode is most likely to lend itself to successful negotiation. Although the answer is undetermined, Face-to-face communication has been proven to have a greater possibility of alleviating miscommunication. When you're in person, you are more apt to pick up all the nuances of the exchange. That way, you will be better able to gauge what the other party is thinking and to determine the direction in which the negotiating is headed.
For the same reasons, it is also easier to create and maintain rapport. If there is already a fair amount of tension in the air, however, negotiating by phone can take the edge off, can provide breathing room and can minimize the effectiveness of any pressure tactics that may have been employed. E-mail's main advantage is that both parties have control over saying exactly what they want to say and how they want to say it. Since there is no ebb and flow to live conversation, the involved parties can keep the floor as long as they want. On the flip side, e-mailing can tend to make the negotiating parties less restrained and more impulsive in their communication. This rashness isn't always a bad thing, but it definitely can be if tensions exist. One study found that abrupt and unmannerly exchanges occurred 102 times when negotiating via e-mail as opposed to only 12 times when negotiating face-to-face.
Understanding Personality Directions
A personality direction is the way in which we lean most of the time in terms of the way we act and react to most stimuli. We hate to be boxed in and categorized, but the reality is, most of the time we are predictable. Sure, people aren't going to be 100 percent predictable all the time, but the more discerning you become, the more you will see how predictable individuals really are.
When you analyze personality directions, ask yourself the following questions:
I.Is your audience mostly logical or emotional?
A.Logical people:
1. Think with their heads
2. Go with what makes sense
3. Are persuaded by facts, figures and statistics
4. Rely on past history
5. Use their five senses
B.Emotional people:
1. Think with their hearts
2. Go with what feels right
3.Are persuaded by emotions
4.Rely on intuition
5. Use their ?sixth sense?
II.Is your audience introverted or extroverted?
A.Extroverted people:
1.Love to communicate
2.Are talkative
3.Involve others
4.Tend to be public people
5.Want face-to-face contact
B.Introverted people:
1.Keep their feelings inside
2.Listen more than they talk
3.Like to work solo
4.Tend to be private
5.Use memos and e-mails over face-to-face communication
III.Is your audience motivated more by inspiration or desperation?
A.Desperation-motivated people:
1.Try to get away from the problem
2.Are stuck in the past, are afraid of repeating mistakes
3.Avoid pain
4.Want to get away from something
B.Inspiration-motivated people:
1.Work towards a solution
2.See a better future
3.Are motivated by pleasure
4.Want to move forward, have vision
IV.Are your audience members or prospects assertive or amiable?
A.Assertive people:
1.Consider results more important than relationships
2.Make decisions quickly
3.Want to be in control
4.Are task-oriented
5.Don't waste time
6.Are independent
B.Amiable people:
1.Consider relationships more important than results
2.Are friendly and loyal
3.Like to build relationships
4.Are great listeners
5.Avoid contention
6.Are nonassertive and agreeable
The more you understand personality directions, the better you will be able to customize your negotiation tactics. Each individual's personality direction will dictate how you customize your message.
Face To Face Cd
Although time consuming and costly, the face-to-face survey method collected data that was practically looked upon as scientific fact. Arguably true, interviews were the most reliable form of surveys at one time, and they were considered to provide the most accurate data because the questions could be lengthy and the interviewer could get a more in-depth response from the subject.
The initial decline of face-to-face interviews began with the evolution of mail and telephone surveys. Those two forms of survey-taking, along with ever-increasing labor costs, began a new era in which detailed, information-gathering surveys were conducted over the phone or through traditional mail. The driving force for abandoning face-to-face interviews was simple: cost. By using traditional mail, a larger pool of data could be collected at a much lower expense to the company performing the survey. The same holds true for phone-oriented surveys. It boiled down to what was cheaper, faster, and ultimately provided more data. However, face-to-face interviews still hold an enormous advantage over newer and cheaper forms of survey-taking: they can acquire data from subjects who would otherwise be impossible to gather data from. While most of us can't imagine life without a computer and the internet, there are still hundreds of millions of people who have no internet access whatsoever. And a face-to-face interview would be able to collect data where an online survey would altogether miss a very large portion of society. Although costly, time-consuming, and labor-intensive, the face-to-face interview is still an extremely powerful tool for collecting data.
Face-to-face surveys offer several, obvious advantages over other forms of market research. They solve obstacles such as: incomplete subject lists, those who are unreachable by computer, and those who do not have phone lines (yes, believe it or not, some people live without a phone line!). When performed over a geographic area, face-to-face interviews leave very little to chance because interviewers simply travel from physical address to physical address and knock on doors. Another bonus is that interviewers can stress the importance of the survey and encourage subjects to provide more accurate data.
Yet another expensive drawback to face-to-face surveys is the proper training of interviewers. The question and answer nature of live interviews requires personnel who conduct the survey to be well-versed in the survey material. They also need to be prepared to handle a wide variety of potential questions and responses from the subject. If training is poor, interviewers can make errors when gathering their data. These errors run the risk of ruining the accuracy of a survey.
A large scale, face-to-face survey performed over a specific area requires strong organization. A supervisor will most likely be needed to organize routes and assist interviewers in case an unlikely question is asked from a subject. Not too mention, there will inevitably be households where nobody is home and a return trip to the residence will be needed. A supervisor - although a necessity for such an undertaking, only adds to the excessive cost of a face-to-face geographic survey.
There's no doubt about it, face-to-face interviews come at a high cost. The labor and time that is required for a live interview survey is hard to justify when there are much less expensive and viable survey systems available. Most often, a telephone survey or even an online, email survey is much more cost effective to perform despite the fact that data will not be collected from certain groups of the population. Considering the above mentioned costs for a face-to-face survey, it's no wonder that face-to-face interviews are the least used survey method.
Both Kurt Mortensen & Christian Rios are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Kurt Mortensen has sinced written about articles on various topics from Leadership, Sales and Negotiation and Web Development. Everyone persuades for a living. Whether you're a sales professional, an entrepreneur, or a stay at home parent, you must convince others to your way of thinking. Find out more at. Kurt Mortensen's top article generates over 12100 views. to your Favourites.
Christian Rios has sinced written about articles on various topics from Auto Insurance, Auto Insurance and Auto Insurance. Earn money with surveys: . UK surveys: . US surveys:. Christian Rios's top article generates over 3600 views. to your Favourites.
Application For Uk Citizenship However should any individual do so it is at his or her own risk for which UK Migration Lawyers Limited cannot be held responsible in any way