If you do want to want to invest in some stocks, hiring a professional broker is probably the best idea there is, albeit some of them do have pricey rates. There is nothing against the constitution that forbids you to deal in the stock trading process by yourself even if you do not have a financial degree or you do not know a stitch about the stock market trade. However, a trained and experienced professional should know more under-the-carpet tricks than the unlearned one.
When you do hire the services of a stock brokerage firm, you need to at least compare rates and services. Think of this hiring process as going to the doctor's office. Sometimes, you go to a medical professional who you have known for ages. Sometimes, you patronize the one with the most affordable rates. And sometimes, when the need arises, you go and seek out specialists to help you with specific physiological concerns.
The same is true with hiring a stock broker, or a stock brokerage firm. You can sometimes avail of the best (even discounted) services if you know the broker(s) personally. In such a scenario, you can trust his or her decisions explicitly which paves the way for a great working relationship between the two of you.
On the other hand, many first time investor look for the stock brokerage firms with the lowest offered rates. And this is not bad per se. It should be pointed out here, that with such reduced rates, those brokerage firms also provide limited services. In fact, the cheaper the rates, the smaller the range of services their brokers can provide. The key to finding affordable yet efficient service is to really study different offerings from different brokerage firms. You might be surprised that the so-called affordable ones offer nothing but consultation services.
Lastly, if you want specialists, you have to be prepared to heave some mighty heavy dough. Brokers who specialize in one asset (like forex trading) can command a certain price, but the price can increase depending on the experience and track record of the firm and its brokers. Investors have varying needs, and if you aim to have a diversified portfolio, you would probably need a team of brokers working for you. Needless to say, that can be very expensive.
So if you are willing to shell our a lot of money, you might as well make sure hat you get your money's worth.
Look into the history and track record of the brokerage firm and the broker(s) assigned to you. This can easily be done by simply asking the firm for experience record. Usually, the longer the firm has been in existence, the better chances you will get of better service. However, you also cannot discount the new firms who happen to be staking their claim in the financial markets. If you can, (since you are looking into pricier deals already) have your own personal lawyer look over their contract of service before you sign anything. This way, you and your money is safeguarded from any possible malpractices.
A meeting with the brokers is also imperative. Here is the best way of gauging whether or not you can work together. If you broker(s) listens to you, and suggests things the way you want it to turn out, then you have a great deal. However, if the broker(s) is silently manipulating you to invest in assets you don't want, or making you deal with speculative trading which you really are not interested in, you might as well ask the firm to assign you someone else. You are allowed this liberty, and if the firm in question does not acquiescence to your request, then it would be better to choose another brokerage firm.
Full Service Brokerage Firm
Brokerage firms must register with various governmental and private regulators, comply with arduous paperwork and record keeping requirements, and wade through multiple layers of red tape to gain the regulatory approval necessary just to make some of the most basic business decisions.
But despite all of this, brokerage firms occasionally run afoul of the law. As an individual investor, it is important to have a basic understanding of what is required of brokerage firms.
Brokerages that take short cuts and cut corners in terms of regulatory compliance are much more likely to be guilty of other transgressions - the type of transgressions that can cost you money.
The National Association of Securities Dealers
The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) is a brokerage regulatory agency second only to the governmental Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in terms of importance.
The NASD is known as a self-regulatory organization (SRO) in that it is not affiliated with the government in any way, but it operates under SEC oversight.
The NASD regulates all investment banking and securities underwriting activity. It also regulates trading in the OTC (over the counter) market of mostly small cap stocks, and the NASDAQ, which is named for the NASD.
It is this authority of the NASDAQ that makes it virtually impossible to conduct business as a brokerage firm without membership to the NASD.
Brokerage Firms' Use of the NASD Name
In order for the employees of brokerage firms to sell financial products or give financial advice, they must be approved by the NASD. Brokerage firms must also be registered members of the NASD, and while this affiliation does carry with it some promise of honesty and professionalism, it is illegal for a brokerage firm use the NASD's name in any manner that would suggest that the NASD has endorsed it.
Brokerages may use the phrase, "member of the NASD," but they may not put undue emphasis on it. If your brokerage firm or any of its brokers try to imply that they are endorsed by the NASD, it is a near surefire sign that they lack other, legitimate credentials and references.
Brokerage Firms' Sales Literature
Probably the most common manner in which brokerage firms violate NASD rules is through their noncompliance with sales literature requirements.
It is important to note that there is a distinction made between advertising and sales literature. Anything in which the brokerage firm has no control over the material's audience - i.e. publication in periodicals, radio or television broadcast, prerecorded telemarketing messages, billboards, phonebook ads, etc. - is considered advertising. The audience for advertising is the general public.
By contrast, sales literature is targeted to specific individuals or subsets of the general populace.
This distinction is important because there are different rules for each. All advertising materials must be filed with and approved by the NASD.
The only exception to this rule is for prospectuses and other such materials approved by the SEC (preliminary prospectuses, offering circulars, tombstones, etc.) Since advertising is, by definition, made available to broad audiences, it is difficult for brokerages to skirt the NASD's filing requirements.
After all, regulators are just as likely to see the unregistered ads as anyone, so any unapproved broadcasts or publications are dealt with behind the scenes by the NASD.
Sales literature is targeted marketing, and individual investors need to be much more wary of all such correspondence than commercials they may see on TV.
Firstly, all sales literature must identify its source - the brokerage firm's name, the person who prepared the materials, and the date it was created.
Secondly, if the sales literature recommends the purchase of a stock, it must identify the stock's most current price, and the price range at which the stock is a recommended buy. The brokerage must also disclose the market's general direction, any buy/sell/hold recommendations made for similar securities in the past 12 months, and data revealing all recommendations (winners and losers) made in the past year.
Additional Sales Literature Requirements
Mutual funds are a favorite financial product for brokerage firms to market. When recommending mutual funds in sales literature, brokerages should use 10-year charts to show the fund's performance in varying market conditions. If charts are used, the source of the data must be identified.
The fund's highest sales charge possible must be revealed, and the brokerage firm may not compare the fund being marketed to any other investment product in terms of safety or performance.
Finally, the most obvious violation of all is for a brokerage firm to guarantee performance of an investment product in any way. Any brokerage firm that attempts to masquerade opinions as facts is in willful violation of NASD regulations, not to mention standard professional ethics.
Any company that would be so careless in its regulatory compliance is likely to be careless with your investment capital, and should be avoided without exceptions.
Both Justin Demerchant & William Smith are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Justin Demerchant has sinced written about articles on various topics from Video Games, Video Games and Health. Justin DeMerchant is the founder of ,. Justin Demerchant's top article generates over 27100 views. to your Favourites.
William Smith has sinced written about articles on various topics from Investments, Network Marketing and Baseball. William Smith the author provides additional financial information on many subjects as well as the secret to his success in the market along with 5 Free power stock picks emailed daily so grab your Free subscription on his website at. William Smith's top article generates over 90500 views. to your Favourites.
Best Car Lease Deals 2009 Chevrolet has dubbed the Malibu as the car that nobody can ignore and this is all for good reason.