In the United States today, the GPS tracking system has become a staple for U.S. drivers, especially those employed in positions requiring an excessive amount of driving. Though GPS was made public by President Reagan after the destruction of Korean Airlines Flight 007, it has taken over twenty years to penetrate the culture of everyday life. Now, it seems impossible to think of this modern life without the ever-present GPS-enabled device, whether it be a phone, a driver aid, or even mapping services.
The GPS tracking system for the United States, officially called NAVSTAR-GPS, is the only Global Navigational Satellite System (GNSS) that is in optimal use. It was developed and maintained by the United States military, and uses a minimum of three satellites to triangulate position through a series of time and orbit reports. Though its use has been widespread among many industries for a long time, the recent surge in affordable hand-held technology has now made it so affordable it has become a standard feature for many cellular phones.
The Russian Federation has developed its own GPS system called GLONASS. This system is an alternate to the US version, and is considered to be complementary with GNSS. Begun in 1976, GLONASS uses 24 total satellites, with 21 required for processing any given the signal and three satellites used as spares. GLONASS uses two types of signals to calculate position, and can also measure the velocity of a traveling vehicle as well. As with the US version, GLONASS was originally developed to replace the aging Tsikada System, which used to take up to an hour to find a given position.
The Chinese tracking system is known simply as COMPASS. This is projected to include 35 satellites and span the entire globe. There will be two types of service: open (public) and restricted (military). Even though it is also known as Beidou-2, this system is not going to be anything like Beidou-1, China's original GNSS. This GPS system is definitely one to watch in the coming years. Presently, it only has a limited scope of use.
In India there is a great deal of anticipation concerning the Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS). This system was created to address the grim realty that should a serious situation develop or a disaster occur, other GPS systems will not be available to serve the Indian subcontinent. This system was approved by the government in 2006 and is expected to be available in 2009. Unlike other systems that include an open component for public use, the IRNSS will be under limited government control.
The European Union's (EU) GPS tracking system is branded GALILEO. This system was unanimously approved in 2007 by all 27 member countries, with hopes to be operational by 2013. There will be bases in both Italy and Germany, and unlike GPS, Galileo is created by the public and not the military, meaning that the military will not have the ability to block it from public use like other countries. The GPS race is on and the world is about to become that much smaller.
Gps Dog Tracking Systems
Vehicle tracking systems are becoming an increasingly important part of the fleet management business. As GPS and other location technologies have developed, these systems have not only become more accurate but also more affordable. There are however many fleet managers out there who are still unsure whether a vehicle tracking system would really help improve the efficiency and profitability of their business.
One of the reasons why some of these fleet managers have not yet implemented vehicle tracking systems is because they feel that they have a trustworthy staff and do not have to keep an eye on them. Fundamentally they do not understand the ultimate purpose of a vehicle tracking system, it is not the encroachment of 'Big Brother' but instead is a way for companies to improve their operations by reducing fuel costs, maintenance expenditure and insurance premiums.
An adjunct to this belief is that if a vehicle tracking system is implemented the staff members will respond with union action. Once again this is down to a belief that these systems are 'Big Brother' in disguise. This viewpoint is ultimately incorrect, once staff members are given an understanding of how a tracking system will make their jobs easier, any resistance is soon quelled. Staff members will find reduced amounts of paperwork and less hours spent on the road after implementation, subsequently realising that there are benefits that outweigh the fear of supervision.
Technophobia is definitely one of the reasons preventing many fleet managers from implementing vehicle tracking systems. The belief that they are difficult to install and use is prevalent, although through education this situation is changing. Normally companies will supply an expert to help with installation. The system requires a GPS device in every vehicle and a computer back at the headquarters although depending on the system used, the installation can differ. This expert should also be able to help with training operators how to use the system most effectively.
As well as the fear of technology, many fleet managers are happy using the system already in place. This may incorporate mobile phone technology but ultimately this is a poor system compared with modern variants. Using mobile phones is unrewarding as a way to track employees; it is easy to lie at the end of a phone. Additionally, using mobiles does not give the fleet manager information on the car mileage or the maintenance schedule. As well as this, a GPS system will give up to the minute information on vehicle whereabouts and direction. Fundamentally a GPS system is an all encompassing solution to tracking requirements.
Confusion is another reason why some fleet managers have not yet made the investment in a vehicle tracking system. With so many different varieties on the market today this is understandable. For the fleet manager however, making an assessment of their business' needs is an essential part of finding the right system. Added to this is the investment that a tracking system requires, some can be expensive although through hard bargaining it is possible to receive a good deal. In terms of price and payment it should be remembered that most vehicle tracking systems are more like a service rather than a product, understanding that a monthly charge will normally be applicable is essential.
Hopefully this information will help those fleet managers out there who are still unsure whether to implement a GPS vehicle tracking system or not. If technophobia, confusion over pricing and fear of surveillance can be overcome, implementation should be a painless process resulting in amore streamlined, efficient and profitable business.
Both Fabian Toulouse & Thomas Pretty are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Fabian Toulouse has sinced written about articles on various topics from Recreation and Sports, Motorola Cell Phone and Health. If you are interested in purchasing a system, be sure you buy from a trusted. Fabian Toulouse's top article generates over 673000 views. to your Favourites.
Thomas Pretty has sinced written about articles on various topics from Formula One, Debts Loans and Interior Design. Technology expert Thomas Pretty looks into the myths surrounding systems and how businesses can benefit from implementation.. Thomas Pretty's top article generates over 1500000 views. to your Favourites.
Best Bad Credit Auto Loans Lastly, make sure that your chosen lending company reports your payments to the credit bureaus as this is the only way you can rebuild your credit