Pile carpets are most immediately a decorative textile substitute for furry hides or sheepskins. Like the latter, their function relates to insulation and comfort as well as d'cor. Such woven versions of hides or hide rugs evolved for various reasons. First, by shearing the animals and weaving the rugs out of the wool, it was no longer necessary to kill the animals to have a rug. And by weaving the rug it became possible to make it into a piece of decoration as well. One could dye hides in one color, or in several swaths of color, but it was not easy to make anything approaching a design in this way, at least not with any intricacy or permanence.
But a woven pile rug, could be given some sort of design, just like flatwoven textiles, while also imitating the texture, density, and protective quality of fur hides. This is how the pile rug came to be born, but the question is where?
From the outset it seems improbable that such an adaptation of fur hides took place in the warm climate of the Middle East, except for the mountainous regions of Turkey, the Caucasus, and Persia. But mainstream Oriental rug weaving has always been primarily an urban industry, not a production of remote highlands. Moreover, the many archaeological discoveries made in the last century tend to indicate that the earliest carpets were produced and invented beyond Central Asia in the High Altai Mountains of Siberia to the north and west of Mongolia. The inhabitants there were tent-dwelling nomads whose material culture was dominated by textile production. Such people required rugs to protect them from the elements, in addition to embellishing their domestic environment. It seems that these peoples created the knotted pile carpet by about 600 B.C., if not earlier.
The specific evidence for this comes from the discoveries made by Russian archaeologists at the frozen tombs of Bashadar and Pazyryk in the High Altai region. The site of Bashadar produced a fragment of a pile carpet carbon dated to the sixth century B.C. Unfortunately, no pattern is discernible on this fragment, but at Pazyryrk another pile carpet was discovered damaged but virtually intact, datable to the fifth or fourth century B.C. After conservation, its color and design turned out to be nothing less than astounding. The center of the rug had a king of chessboard design with small floral motifs in each square. The borders also had floral designs, as well as a frieze of horsemen, one of griffins, and another of fallow deer. The palette had rich reds, soft greens, blue, and gold, with a velvety pile.
Because of its design and technical sophistication, some scholars have doubted that the
Pazyryk carpet was a product nomadic weaving. The frieze of horseman and the floral designs are clearly related to ancient Persian art, especially the reliefs at the great site of Persepolis. The weaving technique is also very fine, which, to some scholars at least, suggests urban workmanship or origin. Consequently, the Pazyryk piece has often been touted as the world's oldest Persian rug. But this is most unlikely. Other frozen tombs at Pazyryk produced fragments of ancient Persian flatwoven tapestry textiles with figural decoration. Since such textiles were imported by the Altai nomads, it is easy to see how designs from Persian court art could have reached them. The desire to imitate such intricate tapestry designs also explains why the weavers utilized a finely knotted technique, in order to reproduce such delicacy and detail. In addition, the frieze of deer is not Persian. They come from the local repertory of Nomadic ?Scythian? art.
The evidence of the wool and dyes in the carpet is also decisive. The wool is identical in type to the wool of sheepskin hides found in other tombs at Pazyryk, which were clearly local. The red dye in the carpet is made from lac or kermesic acid, derived from insects, and the particular type of lac is specifically Polish or Baltic in origin. This dye would have been more readily available to the wide-ranging Eurasian nomads who lived from Eastern Europe to the High Altai than to the ancient Persians far to the south. It is therefore most likely that the Pazyryk carpet was woven locally by nomadic peoples, even though its design reflected the cosmopolitan influences of far-off regions. Scholarship has come to recognize, moreover, that nomadic Asiatic weavings ? rugs, tapestries, and embroideries ? produced at various times and places generally tend to reflect the impact of urban textile production from the Middle East. The Pazyryk carpet is simply an early example of this phenomenon.
But even if knotted pile carpets were developed by Central Asian or Altaic nomads, the idea, if not the actual carpets themselves would have reached the Middle East by ancient times where the technique would have been adopted in local production. It is very likely that the ancient Persians also made knotted carpets like their nomadic neighbors to the north, but these have not been preserved. Nor do we have actual pile carpets preserved from Greek and Roman culture.
Classical textual references to carpets exist, but they are ambiguous; they could simply refer to flatwoven floor coverings or blankets. Not until late antiquity in the burials of fifth-century A.D. Roman Egypt do we again encounter actual pile carpets, made now in a looped technique. Around the same time there is also continued evidence of carpet production from Central Asia and the Caucasus, where pile carpet fragments have been discovered in caves. Fragments of first century A.D. pile rugs discovered on the western periphery of China and Tibet suggest that the nomadic tradition of the knotted carpet spread east and southward from the Altai region as well.
It is not until the Early Islamic period (seventh to ninth centuries) that the evidence for carpet production again picks up in the archaeological record, and once again it is the dry climate of Egypt that has facilitated the survival of the actual carpets or fragments, especially at Fostat outside old Cairo. This site was actually the rubbish dump for the city, and it it has produced an extensive series of carpet fragments, a number of which are Early Islamic in date. The fragments are small, but one can discern designs of simple floral and geometric type in what would have been allover repeat patterns. Given the limited evidence available, it is hard to generalize about the scale and extent of carpet production in the early Islamic Middle East. It is not until the thirteenth century in Anatolia or Turkey that we finally encounter an actual corpus of surviving large fragments or nearly complete pile rugs. These are preserved in the mosques founded by the new Seljuk Turkish dynasty that has recently come to power there.
The Seljuk Turks were originally nomads from Central Asia who entered Persia and then Anatolia in the eleventh century after their conversion to Islam. Over a century ago, even before the discoveries at Bashadar and Pazyryk, the great pioneer rug scholar, Alois Riegl, was of the opinion that it was such nomadic Turkic peoples from Central Asia who first introduced the knotted pile carpet to the Islamic Middle East around this time. The discoveries at Fostat, however, show that the knotted carpet was already known in the Early Islamic period. Still, Riegl was probably correct in emphasizing the role of Turks from Central Asia, who would have brought with them the ancient tradition of pile carpet weaving from their ancestral Altaic homeland. Turks were already a political and military force in ninth century Egypt, and they were probably responsible for the earliest pile rug production evidenced at Fostat. It is therefore highly probable that when the Turks became a dominant elite across the Islamic Middle East in the tenth and eleventh centuries, the knotted carpet finally achieved its position as a major medium of artistic production under their patronage. From this point on, from Turkey into Persia, the tradition of the Oriental knotted pile carpet as we know it began to evolve continuously down to the present time.
