What if you saw your initial customer approach as more like flirting than scoring - i.e. open the kimono just a little, then step back?
The right prospects don't need anything more than a peek at first - for anything. Isn't that true for you, too? It's thumbs up or down within seconds.
OK ladies, if you buy that, here's the big decision you have to make: If, upon hearing or seeing your initial "pitch" the prospective customer gives you that initial thumbs up or down, then...
Do you want to do therapy or run with the ones who respond?
The right prospects don't need anything more than your mini story to give it a thumbs up or down. They either want what you're enjoying, or they don't. And they want it enough to pay for it, like you do. Else, why bother yourself?"
This assumes of course that you and your kimono look and sound your best for that first moment of contact with the prospective customer...E.g.
"I market a product for someone who has achy knees going up the stairs and who doesn't want to do surgery or drugs, like the way I used to be. Do you know anyone who might like to know about a product like that?"
Versus,
"I market patented, unique, scientifically proven nutraceuticals! The company doctors say it's like new software for the human body that works at the cellular level, and..."
If you WERE going to respond, which would you want to know more about?
Spending your time getting ready for JUST the ones who give your thing a thumbs up is what Seth Godin said the other day. Only he said it about your website instead of your kimono:
"Fact: about half the visitors to your website leave after less than five seconds."
Then, he says, you get to choose how you will spend your time. Either: Turn those quickie visitors (browsers) into interested prospects (somehow) or
"ignore them and realize that you only get a chance to talk to the people who are going to stay for more than five seconds anyway. The rest of the population is ignoring you... don't let them distract you from your real mission, which is to amplify interest, not create it." See the original here: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/02/wait.html
And anyway, how do you think it looks to keep begging someone for a tennis game when they've already said they don't play tennis?
I M Just A Little Unwell
It is this show where people either cheer or jeer for Simon Cowell's scathing critiques of sub par singing. It is this show where people watch as Randy Jackson gives an unenthusiastic I ain't feelin ya, dawg. And it is this show where we tune in to view Paula Abdul's latest bout with craziness. And then we might actually hear someone sing a few songs.
If that seems a bit harsh, well, it is. American Idol isn't a bad show. It's very entertaining, especially in the context of reality shows which seem to be dying down in popularity. Or they're at least aren't as many of them as there had been.
But it seems as though the show has ADD. The show seems more focused on stirring up controversy between hosts, or hyping up a contestant's wild appearance and hilariously bad singing than it is to actually watching the contestants perform their songs.
Granted, like any show, American Idol has had its share of oddball contestants, scandals, and just great moments. But it seems like after the William Hung incident that they are trying to top it every year.
The primary problem lies with the fact that the show just doesn't seem to want to focus on the performers nearly as much as the scandals. Here we have people who have worked hard to get their chance at fame, and yet we appear to be more interested in laughing at a contestant who is wasting the time of America.
It just seems silly to focus on the person's personality quirks as opposed to what talent (or lack thereof) they have. And for a show that America votes on more than they do for who the next leader of this country will be, it makes you question whether or not they were voting because of talent, or because of the show's baggage.
Now, the first season's winner, Kelly Clarkson, and the winners of the following two seasons most assuredly had talent. But later installments have featured people whose talent is somewhat questionable.
While others were able to shed the attachment to American Idol and stand on their own as performers, some seemed to have simply flickered out. As stated before, American Idol isn't a bad show, but it is, however in need of a heavy dose of Ritalin.
Both Kim Klaver & Dror Klar are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Kim Klaver has sinced written about articles on various topics from Marketing, Water Filters and First Date. . Kim Klaver's top article generates over 301000 views. to your Favourites.
Dror Klar has sinced written about articles on various topics from Satellite, The Internet and Finances. Dror Klar is a writer and promoter of news, movie reviews and celebrity information. If you are in the market for DIRECTV or Dish Network
Better Home And Gardens Magazine If you are interested in getting your own garden pond you should start looking for the real thing, try and find out what kinds of ponds you like and only after you have seen a few start researching f...