I have a sneaking suspicion that the more a piece of market research costs, the less likely it is to actually be read.
All around the world, market research carefully generated by government bodies, universities and private companies is propping up wobbly desks, mopping up spilt coffee and gathering dust in forgotten corners.
Meanwhile killer competitive insights remain undiscovered by those that could turn them into profitable business decisions.
The problem does not so much lie with the quality of the research, nor the competence of those that commissioned it. I believe the biggest make or break factor for the usefulness of any knowledge is how effectively it can be transferred out of the researchers' brains and into the brains of those who are in a position to act on it.
I recently asked some busy, busy clients how I could better help them consume the research they had paid for. The most common answer (almost unanimously in fact) was to implant it straight into their brains!
Now, I'm not sure those direct-to-brain research implants are quite ready to hit the streets yet.
So in the meantime, here are my top tips for ensuring the insight from research gets successfully transferred to those who can actually do something based on it.
1. Put a human face on it
People trump numbers and charts every time. Finding a way to bring your numbers and analysis back to people is a sure way to get people paying attention.
One of the techniques I use for this is the development of personas. I distill key customer segmentation information and put an appropriate human face on it, based on known characteristics, phrases and behaviors.
The impact is massive, because well-crafted visitor personas are intuitively grasped by people that would otherwise struggle to get their head round research data in other forms.
When you hear businesses or staff member referring to a persona by name, you know knowledge has been transferred to where it belongs.
But a human face doesn't just mean complex persona development.
Researchers are great at stripping the human element out of the research process until nothing but hard data remains (and there are some good reasons for this). Yet for effective knowledge transfer, look at getting some of those real words and real people back in.
A real person expressing their own views (whether on video, audio or in writing) will have way more impact on an audience than pages of skilfully crafted data interpretation.
The human face is also invaluable in transferring insight to staff members with little customer contact. You should see the look on the face of a member of staff when they understand for the first time the impact of their efforts on a real person's life.
2. Apply to so what factor (or addressing what's in it for me?)
Research agencies and academics may not object to research for research's sake, but the rest of the world tends to ask “so what?” or indeed utter less polite equivalents.
So what?, Why should I care?, What's in it for me? Fail to address these objections at your peril. I've written lots about the “so what?” factor, so I won't labor it here. But in short, forget the “this is so fascinating” and skip to the “this will make you a lot of money.” Ears will soon prick up.
3. Less is more
It takes way more time to write a short report than it does to write a long one. Tough, because less really is more when it comes to acting on research.
If you need different lengths, styles and formats different internal audiences, take this into account from the start. Just don't send the CEO the 100 pager and expect it to be read!
If you are commissioning research, think about being specific with your agency about how little you want to see, as well as how much. I'd love a client to challenge me to distill my research findings to a 50 word SMS message!
4. Resonance – or the subtle art of letting people hear their own words
Generally speaking, people like taking part in research. But they become jaded if they are continually asked for their input, yet they see no changes or improvements.
Resonance is the delicate art of letting research participants understand you heard them and their views mattered and is particularly useful in community and internal organization research. People recognize the echo of their own words and respect that you took them seriously. The outcome tends to be that they then take the research more seriously, improving acceptance and actionability.
5. Keep it simple
Final tip? Keep it simple. No, I'm not suggesting you dumb down the ideas, not at all.
Just that for every 5 minutes spent on being the clever old genius you undoubtedly are, you commit 55 minutes to distilling it so it can be clearly understood by others.
Think about ensuring the language, the graphs, the layout are as clear and simple as possible – and test it out. I often run complex research reports by my Mum. Seriously, she can detect fuzziness and jargon at twenty paces.
So, keep it human, aim for resonance and keep reporting short, relevant and simple. Follow these five tips when commissioning or producing research for your organisation and people will pay attention.
That way, you can ensure that your research generates profitable action, instead of generating dust.
Leadership Research Findings Practice And Skills
Gout is a type of rheumatoid arthritis that causes pain, swelling and inflammation of the joints. Statistics indicate that there are more than 3.5 million people in the United States confronted with gout, most of them developing the disease after the age of 50. Although gout can be developed by both men and women, it predominantly affects the male gender. For many years, gout sufferers have been advised to limit the intake of purines and proteins in their diet, by avoiding fatty meats, seafood and even some purine-rich vegetables. Dairy products have also been considered to influence the development of gout, but in the absence of any clinical evidence.
Until recently, these recommendations were based solely upon the theory that purine-rich foods and a high protein intake are directly related with the occurrence of gout, by increasing the blood levels of uric acid. In order to reveal conclusive evidence regarding the contribution of a purine and protein-rich diet to the development of gout, medical scientists have conducted various experiments in the last decade. However, a recently ended experiment has finally clarified the way diets influence the occurrence and the progression of gout. The experiment was initiated in 1986 and involved the participation of more than 50.000 medical professionals who volunteered to perform an active research upon the matter. The participants were divided into five distinctive groups, each of them respecting a certain type of diet for a long period of time.
The experiment was monitored with the means of questionnaires that had the role of verifying whether the imposed diet was respected accordingly and whether there were any clinical signs of gout among the participants. The testing group benefited from regular medical examinations and frequent body weight monitoring. Each group of volunteers followed a particular type of diet in the course of 12 years. The imposed diets included distinctive quantities of meats, seafood, purine-rich vegetables, high-fat dairy products and low-fat dairy products.
After finalizing the 12- year experiment, researchers were able to confirm the fact that purine-rich and high protein diets facilitate the occurrence and the progression of gout. However, the results weren't dramatic. In fact, the data accumulated during the research suggested that there are various other causes responsible for causing gout rather than unhealthy diet.
At the end of the research, only 730 volunteers were diagnosed with gout. The highest incidence of the disease was registered among the volunteers with ages between 55 and 65. Seafood diets were identified to be the most influential in the occurrence of gout, as the majority of gout cases were registered among the participants who regularly consumed high quantities of seafood. A slightly smaller number of gout cases were registered among the participants who respected meat diets, while the diets that contained high-fat and low-fat dairy products proved to have little influence upon the occurrence of gout. In fact, the participants who drank around two glasses of skim-milk each day considerably reduced their risk of developing gout. The volunteers that respected high-protein and purine-rich vegetable diets presented the lowest risk of developing gout.
Both Vicky Brock & Groshan Fabiola are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Vicky Brock has sinced written about articles on various topics from Marketing, The Internet and Marketing. Vicky Brock is Co-Founder of one of Scotland's leading market research agencies. She is also International Committee Co-Chair of t. Vicky Brock's top article generates over 2400 views. to your Favourites.
Groshan Fabiola has sinced written about articles on various topics from Woman Menopause, Medical Condition and Health. If you are intersted in finding more information about you can click on this website. Also you will find there valuable information about. Groshan Fabiola's top article generates over 6120000 views. to your Favourites.
Bee Gees Wedding Day Lyrics It is also a major purchase in their life. As with any purchase it never hurts to plan ahead and comparison shop. You would plan and shop for a car purchase of 28,000. Why not for your wedding?