The same Four Stages exist in every successful change management? process, whether that change is a corporate wide initiative, or the introduction of a new management team or leader, or an information system change, or an individual looking to lose ten pounds. While the scope and complexity and value of changes will vary, the Four Stages remain the same ? always ? everywhere ? they do not change. Read on to see where your organization's projects and change initiatives fit in the Four Stages, and to see how to make each of the Stages work for you.
The Four Stages
Stage One ? Start Up. Stage One involves the expectations of the architects of change. Those expectations include: how much more effective we will be; how much more market share we will get; how much better information flow we will have; how much better we will look. This is the stage where opportunity is identified and turned into action.? The expectations have a few things in common: they are seen as improving the enterprise; they all require some degree of change; they are optimistic and aggressive in their time frames for completion; and they assume they will be successful. Often, aggressive goals and/or expectations are set that assume a best possible case scenario for completing the project. This step is characterized by a high level of enthusiasm and commitment and energy and ownership on the part of the architects of the change.
Stage Two - Frustration. In this stage reality sets in. Things are not working out as planned; the end result may take longer than expected; certain critical resource requirements were not planned or budgeted. People begin to see that their initial expectations for the project are not going to happen. Resistance is occurring ? often in subtle ways. This is the place where energy starts to be lost; schedules start to slip; people start to bail out ? this is the danger stage. Frustration replaces optimism.? Questions about the value of the change, the need for it and the "how did I get here? " question are heard. This is the stage where most projects fail ? or even worse than that, flounder along sucking up resources and time before finally disappearing.
Stage Three ? Renewal. Out of the experiences of Stage Two comes a revised set of expectations and requirements. People who have stayed the course begin to take leadership in getting the project back on track.? The resources dedicated to completing the project will be different from the resources that were originally planned.? This is the Stage where the lessons of Stages 1 and 2 are put to use in reestablishing the change process. This is the critical place for the leadership of the organization to get things back on track ? in many cases using a redesigned track. At this stage, enough experience and feedback is available to allow an assessment of cost/reward and what it is going to take to get the project completed successfully. Goals are revised, budgets reviewed and changed, decisions on whether or not to proceed are made. This stage is characterized by renewed effort, energy and commitment and a feeling that the process of change is moving forward again. The leadership skills and behaviors required for this stage are different than those needed when the project first started.? Hope replaces frustration and positive energy replaces negative thoughts.
Stage Four ? Success. The change process is now meeting or exceeding the Stage Three goals and is beginning to provide the return on investment that was envisioned in Stage One. Things are going well, there is a good feeling about where things are headed and how the change can contribute to the continuing success of the enterprise. Effort is being rewarded with results. Tangible improvements are growing out of the effort being expended. Recognition for jobs well done occurs. Little successes are becoming big successes. Metrics are looking good and major parts of the project are completed. People start going home before their families are in bed.
Wouldn't it be great if that was the way most projects and initiatives work? ? with successful outcomes that meet the expectations of the organization and its leadership? Many do ? and the ones that do share a series of critical conditions that make success happen.
Conditions Leading To Success In All Of The Four Stages
It is accepted that all Four Stages will occur, unless the project dies or founders in Stage Two, and they will occur in the same order every time. Plans to minimize the negatives and maximize the positives of each stage are made.
Always, at every Stage, accountability and responsibility are clearly spelled out and understood.
Conditions Leading To Success in Stage One - Startup
Strategy and vision must be communicated by the leadership of the organization so that goals and expectations and accountability can be defined.? If a "Ready, Fire, Aim" approach is used, then goal and review steps are planned to create early opportunities for constructive feedback on the "Fire" step and its results.
Selection of the leaders and team members that will start the process is recognized as critical. The blending of behaviors and attitudes and technical and personal skills will ensure success ? or jeopardize the project from the beginning.
Stage One talent requirements are recognized as probably different from what is needed in Stages Two, Three and Four. Good people selection can overcome a lot of other shortcomings. Poor selection will screw up the best plan!
The people who will do the work and be affected by the change are participants in the planning of the process. That inclusion creates champions in the organization who will stick with it through the rough times.
Stage One is always maximized, no matter how tempting it may be to shortcut. The initial energy and commitment generated in Stage One can carry the project for a long time.?
Regularly scheduled reviews are held so that access to the progress of the effort occurs for leaders without the appearance of? acting only on negative exceptions.
Small successes are celebrated. The process is designed so the successes along the path can be recognized and rewarded. For many people, rewards while on the journey are essential to continued motivation. It is recognized that individuals may not be in a position to see the progress of the entire process, but they need feedback on how they are contributing.
Conditions In Stage Two ? Frustration
This is where leadership in the organization must remain fully supportive and sustain effort and attention ? people respond to what they believe is important to the Boss.
As things go wrong ? and they will - the insistence on a "How do we fix it" behavior, and the discouraging of a "Who do we blame" behavior is critical to maintaining or renewing positive energy.
Stage Two is accepted as a critical part of change, regardless how well planned Stage One may have been.
It is understood that the people in the project will know when it is in Stage Two, long before The Boss knows it. Communications? are kept "unfiltered" to allow Early Warning.
Conditions In Stage Three ? Renewal
The periodic reporting structure started in Stage Two? becomes even more critical to success. It creates structure for people to communicate not only accomplishments, but concerns and issues as well ? the "Opportunities and Jeopardies" of the process.
This is where review and amendment are a necessary part of maximizing the effectiveness of the change initiative. This Stage is seen as a normal part of the process, and not as an exception based on failure of planning, execution, individual effort or competence.
Expectancy, and commitment that the project or initiative will succeed is communicated.? Most failures occur within sight of the finish line. This is the time to sustain effort.
Conditions In Stage Four ? Success
Reward, reward, reward. People need to be recognized, and as the benefits start to flow to the organization, recognition, bonuses, time off, promotions, are all appropriate to both reward performance and to establish the climate for commitment on future changes.
A systems approach to the project is in place. Knowledge gained is identified and used for future change processes.
Everyone's eye stays on the ball. Celebration is great, but not at the price of reduced effort while in sight of the finish line. This will require a different behavior set than the one that started the change ? now is the time for the behaviors that "stick to it" to be recognized and rewarded.
Use these Stages and conditions to ensure the success of your change processes ? and add to them those elements that have worked in your own organization to increase the competitive advantage of your organization.
Managing Change In Organisations
The rate of organizational change has not slowed in recent years, and may even be increasing. In spite of the importance and permanence of change, most change initiatives fail to deliver the expected organizational benefits. It is little wonder then that the fear of managing change and its impacts is a leading cause of anxiety in managers.
To lend assistance, there are now available many guides to help change agents drive and manage change. These serve a very valuable purpose. Nonetheless, guidebooks can only assist so far. Every organization is different; different structures and processes, different environment and different culture, just to begin with. No guide, no matter how comprehensive, is able to offer prescriptions to suit every company's particular circumstances and objectives.
Add to this the fact that bringing about change in today's organizations is fundamentally about changing people's behavior in certain desired ways. Implementing the new accounting system hardware and software and distributing the new procedures is only the start. Managers, supervisors and operators need to be engaged enough to use the new system effectively. Much of the change process is about developing and nurturing relationships. An approach that displays integrity and engenders openness and trust with all employees is a necessary ingredient of success. This goes to the heart of what change agents, sponsors and implementers are as opposed to what rulebook they follow.
A principled approach to initiating and managing change will fill in the gaps left by the guidebooks and bring to life the human dimension of change. There are five principles that generally underlie successful change programs. These principles are supported by a wealth of research and experience and are summarized below. Adopting these principles in both spirit and practice will enhance significantly your program's chance of realizing its proposed benefits. Let us look at each of these principles in turn.
1. Sponsorship
The change program has the visible support of key decision-makers throughout the organization and resources are committed to the program.
How this principle can be applied:
A senior executive is nominated as Program Sponsor.
2. Planning
Planning is conducted methodically before program implementation and committed to writing. Plans are agreed with major stakeholders and objectives, resources, roles and risks are clarified.
How this principle can be applied:
A Business Case is written and approved prior to implementation.
3. Measurement
Program objectives are stated in measurable terms and program progress is monitored and communicated to major stakeholders.
How this principle can be applied:
Program milestones are defined.
4. Engagement
Stakeholders are engaged in genuine two-way dialogue in an atmosphere of openness, mutual respect and trust.
How this principle can be applied:
Employee representatives sit on the program steering committee.
5. Support structures
Program implementers and change recipients are given the resources and supporting systems they require during and after change implementation.
How this principle can be applied:
New procedures are documented.
The social, legislative and business environment is changing constantly. This permanent state of flux is placing increasing demands on our managers to proactively drive change and on our employees to be ever adaptable. Rulebooks and guides can only go so far in providing assistance. The recognition and adoption of certain change principles will fill in the gaps and provide the necessary human dimension to any change initiative.
Such principles will need to center on the importance of executive sponsorship, methodical planning, goal setting and progress reporting. In addition, the human dimension of change will need to be embodied in such principles as the value of engaging the various stakeholders and providing initial and ongoing support to the change implementers and recipients.
Both Andrew Cox & Vicki Heath are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Andrew Cox has sinced written about articles on various topics from Computers and The Internet, Travel and Leisure and Politics. Andy Cox and the Cox Consulting Group have helped many organizations in designing and implementing change. To reach the Cox Consulting Group, go to
Christian Music Search Engine This would save a lot of time and wasted effort. All in all a good bargain for a business either big or small. No wonder, that it is scaling the popularity charts