The U.S. real estate boom of the past ten years has seen homeownership rise from 65% to 69%. Unfortunately with the market cooling the value of real estate is plummeting leaving homeowners holding mortgages that greatly out value the real estate they presently hold. There is now something that can help.
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 was enacted on December 20, 2007 to assist homeowners who are in such a predicament. Normally, a homeowner, in an attempt to avoid foreclosure would modify their current mortgages, that is, “short sell” the property, or deed their home in lieu of foreclosure back to the bank holding the lien on the property. Such remedies often leave the homeowner with a debt for property no longer in their possession. In most situations the lender would forgive the homeowner's debt either in part or full. Unfortunately this left the homeowner facing an additional and in most cases, undischargable financial difficulty, the IRS. That debt which is so graciously forgiven by the lender is now recognized as taxable income by the IRS. The homeowner receives a tax bill for the forgiven amount for money forgiven and never truly received.
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act is designed to exclude such debt forgiveness on the principal residence if the balance of the loan was less than $2 million for a debtor's primary domicile. The act only applies to that debt which was forgiven in the 2007, 2008 or 2009 tax years. Debt reduced through mortgage restructuring, as well as mortgage debt forgiven in connection with a short sale or foreclosure, may qualify for this relief. The requirements are that the debt must have been used to buy, build or substantially improve the taxpayer's principal residence and must have been secured by that residence. Debt used to refinance qualifying debt is also eligible for the exclusion, but only up to the amount of the old mortgage principal, just before the refinancing.
What does this mean to the homeowner in trouble? Everything. There is now another option available to them, which will not lead them from one financial frying pan to the other. Prior to the Act, homeowners would attempt to negotiate with the lender not to forgive the deficit in the loan but to file suit against them. This was the strategy in the reasoning that a judgment lien is dischargeable under a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy were IRS liens are not. IRS tax liens remain through the bankruptcy filing and distribution and the homeowner would end up with the lien coming out on the other side of the bankruptcy. Leaving them in the same predicament of owing money on income never actually received.
The Act will not extend to other forgiven debt such as those on second homes, income or rental property, business property, credit cards or car loans. In those instances the filing of a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy might be in the homeowner's best interest depending on the financial situation he is presently in. The homeowner should always consult with an attorney regarding what strategy would be in their best interest.
Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act Of 2007
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (H.R. 3648) has finally been passed by both chambers of Congress as of December 14, 2007 and has been signed into law by the President. This long awaited bill provides much needed debt relief to thousands of home owners who unfortunately have been caught up in the catch-22 of the sub-prime loan fiasco and are losing their homes through the foreclosure process. Once the adjustable rate loans on those homes "adjust up" the home owner almost always cannot afford the higher payments and the foreclosure tidal wave sweeps them from their homes.
Even worse, if the home owner made arrangements to sell the house for less than the actual mortgage, through what is commonly known as a short sale, the IRS came swooping in and claimed the difference between the actual sale price and the mortgage owed on the property as "earned income". Not only do they lose their home through foreclosure, they also incur an additonal tax bill. Talk about a raw deal.
For example. If Joe and Jane Smith owned their home with an adjustable rate mortgage note of $500,000 and was paying at a low adjustable interest rate of 3% per year their payments would be approximately $1,250 per month. But after a two to three year period the interest rate adjusts to 5.75% on the same amount of $500,000. The payment adjusts to approximately $2,396 per month. Joe and Jane's budget will only allow for payments of $1700 per month maximum. They are in trouble. To add insult to injury the real estate market is spiraling down and property values have taken a nose dive, including Joe and Jane's home. The property's value is now $400,000. Joe and Jane's property value is now upside down. They can't afford to pay the mortgage on the property and they can't sell it even for the amount they owe on it. A "catch-22".
The bank foreclosures because they can't pay the mortgage. Joe and Jane in the meantime receive an offer to purchase the house for $375,000. The bank agrees to sell to the prospective buyer, thus releasing Joe and Jane from the responsibility of the $500,000 mortgage, a difference of $125,000. This is forgiveness of debt. To the IRS it's called income. Under the IRS code the IRS could and in many cases has sought to tax the home owner for the debt forgiveness amount. In this case Joe and Jane, as if not already in enough financial trouble, would owe taxes on the $125,000 too. That is until the recent passage of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007.
This Act amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude from gross income amounts attributed to a discharge of indebtedness incurred to acquire a principle residence (the one the home owner lives in). debt forgiveness applies to amounts up to $2Million. This is great relief for all of the Joe and Jane's of the adjustable rate world who just can't keep their homes because the payments are too high and in many instances the property value has also decrease significantly.
THIS IS GREAT NEWS FOR TWO REASONS:
1. The current homeowner is relieved of a staggering and depressive tax obligation possibility, given a way to sell the home for less than owed on it and avoids a foreclosure on the home owner's record.
2. Because the bank has taken the property back in its Real Estate Owned (REO) department it is very motivated to get rid of the property as quick as possible to avoid holding it and suffering a further loss as well as bank regulation demerits that a bank suffers when property is taken back after a mortgage failure. Here's How The First Time Home Buyer Is Helped? It helps the first time home buyer in many ways. The definition of a first time home buyer is anyone who has not owned a home within the last three years prior to obtaining a mortgage on their principle residence.
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 will increase short sales of homes that homeowners cannot afford and now know they cannot be held liable for any "debt forgiveness" tax. Sellers who are forced into foreclosure will have more flexibility in negotiating with the mortgage holding bank and the buyer who makes an offer to purchase the property. Since the property value is now very low it is an excellent time for a buyer to buy the property and lock in the interest rate at a fixed amount that the buyer can afford. A 30-40 fixed interest rate should be obtained. There are plenty of them available. The bank is inclined to work with the buyer in order to get rid of the unwanted inventory.
Remember banks are in the lending business, not the real estate business. They cannot make money unless loans are made. Holding property in inventory does not make the bank money. In fact they lose even more money because the home is now vacant, subject to vandalism and the maintenance and upkeep does not stop. The bank also has to hire a property management company to oversee the property. Get the picture. The bank does not want the property. It wants to sell it. This is great for a first time home buyer. He/she can get a great low market buy, locked in with a long term mortgage rate that they know they can afford before going into the loan and best of all when the real estate industry rebounds, which it surely will, the buyer will reap the benefits of increased value appreciation that helps to build a solid estate.
The first time home buyer can also use one or more of several down payment assistance programs that will help with the down payment on the property purchase. This is money that never has to be repaid. There are several local, state and federal programs available. Down payment assistance up to $50,000 or more is possible. Now is the time to Stop Making Your Landlord Rich!! and own your own home. Hope this helps somebody go out and make their dream of home ownership come true.
Both Michael Goldstein, Esq. & Roy Landers are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Michael Goldstein, Esq. has sinced written about articles on various topics from Finances, Legal Matters and Finances. The forgoing article on the 2007 Mortgage Debt relief act was drafted by the Law Office of Goldstein and Clegg, LLC, a
Car Title Loan Companies The result is that most borrowers are on the down escalator as soon as they sign papers of these loans, however borrowers can avail the facilities of their conveyances till the time of the repayment ...