Contingent pay is any form of financial reward that is added to the base rate or paid as a cash bonus and is related to performance, competence, skill or service. Contingent pay may be consolidated in base pay, in which case it forms the basis for allowances such as sick pay and for pension arrangements. Alternatively, schemes other than skill or service-related pay may provide for awards in the form of cash lump sum bonuses. The latter arrangement is called ‘variable pay’. It is sometimes referred to as ‘pay as risk’, which has to be re-earned, as distinct from consolidated pay, which is usually regarded as continuing as long as the person remains in the job and performs it satisfactorily (Armstrong & Murlis 2004).
The most powerful argument for contingent pay is that it is right and proper to recognize achievement with a tangible reward rather than just paying people for ‘being there’ as happens in a service-related system. Pay should be related to contribution, who contributed more and who get more pay (Armstrong & Murlis 2004).
The other arguments commonly used in favor of contingent pay are that:
•It acts as a motivator
•It encourages and supports desired behaviors
•It delivers the message that performance, competence, contribution and skill are important
•It provides a means for defining and agreeing performance and competence expectations
•It can reinforce the organization’s value
•It can help to achieve culture change by, for example, assisting with the development of a performance culture
The extent to which contingent pay schemes motivate is questionable. The amounts available for distribution are usually so small that they cannot act as an incentive. The requirements for success as set out below are extracting and difficult to achieve.
Money can assist in the motivation process but it is a mistake to believe that by itself it will result in sustained motivation. As Kohn (1994) points out, money rarely acts in a crude, behaviorist, Pavlov’s dog manner. People react in widely different ways to any form of motivation. Contingent pay schemes can create more dissatisfaction than satisfaction if they are perceived to be unfair, inadequate or badly managed, as they often are.
The ‘line of sight’ criterion, as originated by Ed Lawler (1995), sums up the key requirement of any contingent pay scheme, especially one related to performance. This is that individuals and terms should have a clear line of sight between what they do and what they will get for doing it.
A line of sight model adapted from Lawler is shown below:
A contingent pay scheme is more likely to motivate people if:
1.The reward is clearly and closely linked to accomplishment or effort people know what they will get if they achieve defined and agreed targets or standards and can track their performance against them.
2.Reward are meaningful
3.Fair and consistent means are available for measuring or assessing performance, competence, contribution or skill
4.People must be able to influence their performance by changing their behavior and they should be able to develop their competences and skills.
5.The reward should follow as closely as possible the accomplishment that generated it.
Motivation And Performance Management
Performance management is the process through which your business sets, measures and reviews the objectives and performance of your people. Undertaken consistently, effective performance management will help you retain the right people, improve their performance and the overall performance of your business.
Conversely ? the failure to performance manage your team can result in losing your best people, keeping the wrong type of people and the consequent stagnation of your business. But what does this all mean within the context of a small business?
WHAT IS IT?
- Ensuring each of your team is clear of what is expected of them in terms of both outcomes and behaviour
- Giving constructive feedback on an ongoing basis ? positive and negative ? so people know how they are doing on a day to day basis
- Conducting a formal appraisal annually to review their progress - Conducting some kind of performance review every six months
- Challenging and stretching your staff to improve their performance and reach their potential
- Helping under performers to improve and get ?back on track' WHY DO IT?
- It gives your people clarity as to how they are doing and what they need to do to deliver the business plan
- From a legal standpoint, it is a key part of practising good relations with your staff and minimising any legal risk to yourself
- It helps you improve the performance and morale of your team
- It helps you grow your business by stretching and developing your people
- It helps you retain your top performers as they a) are being developed and b) see you are willing to tackle under performing members of the team
- It helps you manage out the people who are not right for the business in an appropriate manner
- It's also the right and fair thing to do for your people
HOW DO I DO IT?
- Ensure everyone has a clear brief about the expectations of their role and the measures of success
- Diarise formal annual appraisals and 6 monthly performance reviews
- Conduct a review at the end of three months for all new starters
- On a day-to-day basis, catch people doing things well and praise them for it. You will see them walk away with a spring in their step and be pleased to be working for you
- Speak to people informally about lateness, absence and deteriorating work standards or attitudes as soon as it starts to become a problem (i.e. "nip it in the bud" as we say in the UK)
- Be consistent by then following these up more formally if things do not change
- Work with under performers to agree a plan and support them in changing
- Equally, set out the consequences of not changing and follow these through
- Record all formal discussions. For example, if you speak to someone about their poor performance and agree some actions, it's good practice to have a written record of what was discussed and agreed
- Be authentic
- Stick to the facts, be honest, be straight
The key thing is to be consistent and fair in this process. It demonstrates that you are not shy about praising people when they do well, yet are still honest and constructive when managing underperformance. It also provides you with a process to identify and then remove obstacles that may be getting in the way of your team excelling and enjoying their work. Performance management plays a crucial part in building trust and credibility with your team. In the same way that building trust and credibility is the foundation of retaining customers and clients ? so it is with retaining staff.
Both Robert Smith & Mr Sital Ruparelia are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Robert Smith has sinced written about articles on various topics from Shopping, Careers and Job Hunting and Medicine. Robert Smith was born in New York City in 1956. He has spent more than 12 years working as a professor of English at New York University. He is always ineterested in helping students writing essays and papers. Now he spends most of his time with his famil. Robert Smith's top article generates over 49500 views. to your Favourites.
Mr Sital Ruparelia has sinced written about articles on various topics from Real Estate, Interview Questions and Interview Questions. Sital Ruparelia, 'The Recruitment & Retention Expert', works with small and mid-sized businesses that struggle with recruitment and retention issues and helps them implement strategies proven to Find & Keep The Right People quickly and cost effectively. R. Mr Sital Ruparelia's top article generates over 22200 views. to your Favourites.