Peer to peer file sharing is regarded as either illegal theft of artists? work or a fair return to listeners or viewers for the money they have paid to get these artists where they are. Which side you take is dependant on whether you are a drug addled artist or a consumer sick of being ripped off for pieces of overpriced plastic or tape.
Do not take me the wrong way here, since not all artists and actors are drug ridden, but many are. Many others do a fine job, but we are still paying for the excesses of what I consider to be the majority, not the minority.
Most people take a middle view, and can understand the frustration of artists and movie makers whose work is being downloaded without payment being made. However, they also understand the view of the consumer, who has paid a considerable sum of money over the years to stars who live a lifestyle far in excess of their abilities. It is that unfairness that prompts many people to take the view that pop and film stars have earned enough from the hard working masses, and should not complain when some use a perfectly legal software system to download some of their so-called ?work?, albeit illegally.
Peer to peer file sharing software is not illegal: it is the way that we use it that is illegal. Many new acts do not complain when we download their work, since that gives them publicity, but once they become famous and they no longer need us, then they complain. That, to me, is hypocrisy though I am willing to listen to the arguments of those who disagree.
It seems strange that bands that were unheard of until they offered free downloads of their work take law suits against the fans that got them to the top for downloading their music. Does that make sense? Or am I missing something? To me, they are nothing but prats that should crawl back to the hole the crept out of.
Many take the view that as long as those who make money from the music and film industry continue to break the laws of most countries in the world and get away with it, then what rights should they have to complain when others do the same, but in a less socially disruptive fashion.
Sure, it is certainly true that breach of copyright is illegal. By definition, therefore, it is illegal for people to use p2p file sharing software to download music and movie files that are protected by copyright. However, which is the greater offence: to download a copyright file or to deliberately break the drugs laws of your country of residence, or of the country you are visiting, and escape the appropriate punishment because your are ?a star??
Most of us know the answer to that, so as long as the stars break the law, then they should stop bleating about us doing the same and keep it shut until they conform. Once they conform, then we might too. Until then, however, the morality of the situation is that we are trying our level best to help them by cutting their income to a minimum so that they can no longer afford to buy drugs using our money. We will no longer pay for their rubbish music, and let's face it, most new music these days is total crap, until they clean up their acts and start to set our kids an example that they would be proud to set their own kids.
Until then we will continue to share our best movies and music tracks throughout our networks. We are members of clubs, and as such, we have the industry's welfare at heart. After all, without them we would have nothing to listen to or to watch. We would have nothing to copy or watch illegally. Once they are clean, then we will become clean.
We have banded together, and will stay banded together, to ensure that we help these drug-ridden stars by depleting them of the resource to purchase drugs and booze so that they will be more able to provide decent movies and music to our children in the future by being clean and working with clear heads. Surely that is an aspiration to be applauded. We are providing a social service and should be commended, not prosecuted.
That is why P2P should be provided with government grants and not hounded. We are not only doing good to the stars by showing them the error of their ways, but are helping the future of the children of our respective nations.
Peer To Peer File Sharing Software
This report provides an overview of the Peer-to-Peer and File Sharing application services market. It details the status of the market today, as well as the migration through various stages of service integration and unification. The report covers all of the major approaches to IP-based applications service development and provisioning currently in the marketplace.
Service providers are in the midst of a gradual evolution from circuit-switched infrastructures to IP-based packet-switched infrastructures. While much of this evolution to date has taken place in the transport and access parts of the network, there are now enhanced services that are being developed and refined. In particular, the architecture of?and market for?next-generation enhanced services is beginning to take shape.
Report Excerpt
1.1 IP Applications Services Markets
This report provides an overview of the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and file sharing services market. It details the status of the market today, as well as the migration through various stages of service integration and unification. LBS is one aspect of IP-based applications service development and provisioning currently being rolled out in the marketplace.
Service providers are in the midst of a gradual evolution from circuit-switched infrastructures to IP-based packet-switched infrastructures. While much of this evolution to date has taken place in the transport and access parts of the network, there are now enhanced services that are being developed and refined. In particular, the architecture of?and market for?next-generation enhanced services is beginning to take shape.
Peer to Peer (P2P) file Sharing Services involve the exchange of audio and video files among networked peers.
Traditional carriers see IP application platforms as a means of beginning their slow migration to fully-convergent IP-based networks and services. Some view the highly personalized services enabled by IP as the ultimate ?sticky? applications that will stem the tide of customer churn. Other carriers desire new, affordable service applications that will bring additional revenue streams. Every carrier is looking for new ways to enhance their service suites, which are rapidly becoming commoditized.
Interestingly, wireless carriers seem to be making headway when it comes to the adoption of new architectural and service paradigms. Given the bandwidth constraints of the medium, the gap between 2G and 3G has been covered in less than a decade. There are compelling reasons for this phenomenon. Wireless architectures have been exposed and have embraced open standards very early in their development lifecycles; therefore, interoperability issues are less formidable as compared to their wireline counterparts. As a corollary, wireless subscribers are reaping the benefits of rich services developed by a large number of vendors.
Fundamentally, wireless operators have had more experience with and greater control over the content in their networks, and have solid billing platforms, which automatically reassure content providers of reliable and stable revenues from content provided to wireless subscribers. Content providers are, therefore, more comfortable with the wireless domain. The IP multimedia subsystem (IMS)-driven paradigm calls for packetization of the access network to transform the services and applications to be network agnostic. This has given further impetus to sophisticated access protocols like high-speed packet data access (HSPDA), enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE), and others to hit the market faster. The drive is led primarily by East Asian and European operators, with North American (NA) operators catching up.
Wireline carriers also expect operational and infrastructure savings from deploying new IP-based services. Many incumbent carriers are choosing to initially implement IP-based services on an overlay network. Taking this approach, carriers do not have to replace circuit-switched network elements, which represent sunk costs and have minimal ongoing operational expenses. In an overlay network scenario, the packet-switched network is isolated from the circuit-switched network, and the two are connected via a gateway. Web-based applications can control the public switched telephone network (PSTN) through this gateway. This architecture preserves the wireline carrier's investment while reducing risk as new opportunities are explored and implemented.
Proof that convergent communications and the world of IP are starting to become realities can be seen not only from the development of IP infrastructure elements such as gateways and softswitches, but also in the development of IP-based application servers, which are designed to deliver actual revenue-generating services for carriers.
Both Peter Nisbet & Bharatbook are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Peter Nisbet has sinced written about articles on various topics from SEO Articles, Online Dating and Advertising Guide. If you want to know more about P2p file sharing services, including the legal services, check out Pete's website and also. Peter Nisbet's top article generates over 110000 views. to your Favourites.
Bharatbook has sinced written about articles on various topics from . For more information, please visit:?id=51180. Bharatbook's top article generates over 590 views. to your Favourites.
Defrosting Meat In Microwave However, there are plenty of beef and chicken recipes out there, so I hope the above suggestions will help you keep your kitchen cooler during the hot summer months