In most cases, the first document filed with a court to initiate a personal injury lawsuit is the Complaint or Petition. This document outlines the Plaintiff's (injured party's) case, as well as providing the names of all parties involved and the court's jurisdiction.
Step 2: Summons
The summons is the court's official notice to the Defendant(s) in a personal injury lawsuit that they are being sued. This document also alerts the Defendant(s) to time limits and dates for filing responses and other materials relevant to the case.
Step 3: Answer
Defendants may answer the Summons with detailed responses to each allegation in the Complaint. They may choose to admit or deny each of the Plaintiff's assertions, or they may answer that they have insufficient knowledge to either admit or deny a claim. This is also a Defendant's opportunity to attempt to get a lawsuit dismissed before it gets too far along.
Step 4: Cross-Claims (optional)
A Cross-Claim in a personal injury lawsuit occurs when there are more than two parties on either side of the case (plaintiffs or defendants). For example, if a Plaintiff sues both Defendant A and Defendant B for a personal injury, Defendant B may sue Defendant A as having been the cause of or impetus to Defendant B's own actions. This Cross-Claim will be subsumed under the same lawsuit and adjudicated simultaneously.
Step 5: Third-Party Claimant (optional)
In some personal injury cases, the Defendant may have reason to try to pass off the legal responsibility to a third party. The Defendant then will file a Third-Party Complaint with the court as part of the original lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff. This will bring in the third party as another Defendant, as well as keeping the original Defendant involved as long as the court deems it necessary.
Personal Injury Claim Settlement
An important ulterior goal is to give at least a preliminary evaluation of the contention that both the number and the cost of claims have been driven to record levels. If the figures bear this out, it would lend support to those who consider the UK to be gripped by a compensation culture, and undermine the Government's view that, although the compensation culture is a myth, the public's erroneous belief that it exists results in real and costly burdens.
Compensation Recovery Unit statistics say that the number of claims has increased only by three per cent in the last five years. The more detailed figures reveal that not all types of injury have reflected in this small increase. In particular, it is notable that have actually declined, and it is the substantial rise in claims for disease that accounts for the overall increase.
The Insurers? Bodily Injury Awards Studies. Throughout the period studied, legal costs, including both claimant and defendant costs, averaged 30 per cent of the total motor personal injury claims. This means that legal costs continued to increase by more than double the rate of the rise of national average earnings.
National Health Service statistics provide that there has undoubtedly been a very great increase in clinical negligence claims in the last 30 or so years. The Pearson Commission reported in 1978 that the number of claims of malpractice against doctors and dentists (including those in private practice) had been running at about 500 a year. By 1990-1991, the estimated number of new medical claims made against the NHS in England had risen to between 5419 and 6979 for the year. The Oxfordshire study reported a ?steady growth? in new claims in the period 1974-1998. In answers to Parliamentary questions in 2005, the number of claims made from 1996-2004 was broken down, using information supplied by the NHSLA. These figures confirmed the ?continuation of the downward trend? in claims numbers that has been evident in recent years. They now are close to the lowest estimate for the year 1990-1991, coming down from a peak in the period 1997-2002.
Cost of claims
A complete picture of the NHS's annual expenditure on clinical negligence compensation in England is available from 1996. This reveals a general upwards trend up to and including the year 2004-2005. The figures are startlingly higher than those available for the start of the 1990's, when the annual cost of clinical negligence compensation was reported to have been L53.2 and L51.3m in 1990-1991 and 1991-1992 respectively. Even these are very much higher than the estimated figure for 1974-75 of L1m. In claims for clinical negligence that were closed by the NHSLA in 2004-2005, defence and claimant costs were equal to, respectively, 13.76 per cent and 19.81 per cent of damages.
Outstanding liabilities for clinical negligence
One of the most frequently misapplied statistics in the current compensation culture debate is the annual estimate of the NHS's outstanding liabilities for clinical negligence (including both known and unknown but expected claims, and taking into account the likelihood of settlement). This has risen from L3.2 billion in 1999 to L5.9 billion in 2003 and L7.8 billion in 2004. The figures refer to liabilities that the NHS claims will arise over a longer period of time, and are very much greater than the sums that are actually paid out on an annual basis. Estimating the cost of outstanding liabilities is an exercise that is fraught with difficulties and the resulting figure representing a ?worst case? scenario has been heavily criticised. Although the estimate of outstanding liabilities is frequently cited in the press and media, it must be handled with care. It would be quite wrong, for example, to use it to calculate the percentage of the annual NHS budget that is currently spent on clinical negligence compensation.
These figures provide the basis for an initial examination of the claim that a damaging compensation culture has developed in the UK in recent years.
Injuryadvice4u is a UK based company, providing free advice on ,
Both Robert Kliene & Michal Costaminnego are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Robert Kliene has sinced written about articles on various topics from Injury Claims. Robert Kliene is a personal injury expert. Visit for more information and articles on. Robert Kliene's top article generates over 1600 views. to your Favourites.
Michal Costaminnego has sinced written about articles on various topics from Family, Compensation Claims and Family. www.injuryadvice4u.co.uk. Michal Costaminnego's top article generates over 9900 views. to your Favourites.
Acsm Personal Training Certification Personal training success derives from a combination of relationships and marketing abilities, so be sure to pay attention and take advantage of every opportunity for personal training success that c...