A statute of limitations is a law which places a time limit on initiating a legal remedy in relation to a misdemeanor or wrongful conduct. It sets forth the time frame or the maximum period in which a certain individual can file for a claim. In every state in the US, there are various statutes that apply for every civil action, and said limitation periods differ from state to state. It is indeed difficult to keep track of all the various states and their exceptions, so it's always best to speak with a qualified lawyer who serves claimants in your state. Your lawyer will tell you if your claim is still eligible or if your right to sue has expired due to statutory limitations. For the purpose of this article, we will focus about the statutes of limitations in the state of California.
Specific civil actions, one of which is professional malpractice may be complicated, but can be understood in simple terms by looking at the particular type of malpractice. For legal malpractice cases, you can file your claim within one year from the date of discovery and up to 4 years maximum from the date of the wrongful act. For medical malpractice cases, it would be 3 years from the date of the injury, or one year from the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered the injury, whichever occurs first. A classical example would be where a patient discovers that there is a foreign object inside his/her body that was left after a surgery. Even if that foreign object was found years after the surgical operation, he/she can still file a medical malpractice claim within one year of discovery.
Here are the statutory limitations for other cases:
Personal Injury: 2 years (regardless of the type of injury sustained)
Fraud: 3 years
Libel/Slander/Defamation: 1 year
Product Liability: 2 years
Injury to Personal Property: 3 years
Written Contracts: 4 years
Verbal Contracts: 2 years
At certain times it’s impossible for a person to discover the cause of an injury, or even to know that an injury has occurred, until after a considerable amount of time. When applied, the "discovery rule" permits a suit to be filed within a certain period of time after the injury has been discovered, or reasonably should have been discovered. The discovery rule does not apply to all civil injuries, and sometimes the period of time for bringing a claim post-discovery can be short, so it is important to seek legal assistance quickly in the event of the late discovery of an injury.
Statutes of limitations may not apply under certain circumstances. Such is usually called as "tolling of statute". There are reasons why a statute is tolled. Some cases may involve minors, in which the statute of limitations is not applicable until the victim reaches the legal age. Mental incompetence may also be a reason for "tolling of statute", or that the defendant got bankrupt (for cases of breach of contract).
You might wonder why there are such limitations for filing claims. One reason pertains to fairness. That is, over time memories fade, evidence is lost or never found, and people prefer to get on with their lives without legal intrusions from the past and having statutes of limitations will more or less push the injured party to action. Another reason for statutes of limitations is for attaining closure or certainty. At some point, society will no longer make its tribunals available for dispute resolution. Eventually, law enforcement agencies will stop using public resources to investigate a given crime.
What you have just read represent only a small sample of some of the periods of statutory limitations in California. If you wish to know how the statute of limitations applies to a specific situation, you should verify the statutory time period and its relevance to your situation with a qualified lawyer.
Statute Of Limitations In California
Legal News Watch reported in 2004 that in one phen-fen lawsuit, after only six hours of deliberation, a Los Angeles jury found in favor of a 56 year old man and awarded him $115,000.00. The man alleged that he suffered heart valve damage after using the fen-phen diet drug Pondimin.
There is one disturbing factor that has hampered the efforts of fen-phen attorneys and derailed some phen-fen lawsuits: California's Two Year Statute of Limitations.
One personal injury specialist from The Consumer Law Page penned the following observations:
Fen-Phen California Warning - Silent Injury-Secret Disease made worse by California's Two Year Statute of Limitations that Starts Running When Injury is First Suspected
California's two-year statute of limitations in personal injury cases begin to run upon the date of the injury or when a person discovers an injury has occurred. Anyone with a valid, enforceable and collectible claim, who files one day after the two year statute of limitations period, is facing dismissal of an outlawed claim.
But, in the case of injury caused by Fen-Phen, the injury is not readily apparent and the statute does not begin to run until the plaintiff knows or should reasonable knowledge of the injury, its cause and a suspicion of wrongdoing. Suspicion is examined from an objective standpoint; the issue is what a reasonable person would know or suspect under the facts of your case. And that is the problem faced by anyone who was treated with Fen-Phen for weight loss.
For this reason, anyone who was treated with Fen-Phen must have an echocardiogram at the earliest possible date to determine whether they have suffered any valve damage. To rely on an office examination when a FDA study shows that only one-half of those people with valve injury can be discovered by stethoscope is not wise.
As a solid precaution to avoid jeopardizing the patient's legal right to seek compensation for suffering a life-threatening and permanent injury that can progress and lead to heart surgery, an echocardiogram should be completed within the one year after the patient first suspected heart injury and if that test shows valve damage, the patient should immediately contact a fen-phen attorney.
California law dictates that whenever knowledge of any injury exists, and the facts that comprise that knowledge would cause -a reasonable person- to suspect negligence, the period covered by the statutory limitations begins, even if medical professionals have offered conflicting opinions or the victim is unaware that any damage has been inflicted.
However, when the victim can demonstrate -delayed discovery-, the two year limit can be extended and may not begin until the injury is clearly defined. This is not particularly helpful for patients who do not receive a definitive diagnosis for several years.
Both John Luke Matthews & Nick Johnson are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
John Luke Matthews has sinced written about articles on various topics from About Branding, Legal Matters and Medical Malpractice. Our specialize in all fields of personal injury, business law, social security, and employment cases. John Luke Matthews's top article generates over 4400 views. to your Favourites.
Nick Johnson has sinced written about articles on various topics from Obesity, Health and Class Action. Nick Johnson is lead counsel with Johnson Law Group. Johnson represents plaintiffs in many states and focuses on injury cases involving Fen-Phen and PPH, Paxil, Mesothelioma and Nursing Home Abuse. Call 1-888-311-5522 today or visit. Nick Johnson's top article generates over 27100 views. to your Favourites.
Benefits Of Joint Venture The joint venture is the best and quickest way for a new Internet Marketer to become established