The advantage with critical illness cover may have been numerous. You could think about keeping your household run and the children continuing their studies should a critical illness occur. Many a times in the event of a critical illness, one may be unable to attend work. Thus, income may be lost. Therefore, when critical illness insurance pays out, you could settle debts that remain outstanding as well as cope with the increasing medical charges for your own treatment. Judging by this, it can be said that critical illness insurance may have become one of the most popular forms of insurance in the UK. So, let’s check out how it evolved as time passed by.



According to Dinani A and others (March 2000) “A Critical Review", should critical illness cover never been designed there may still have been considerable sales in the insurance market. These sales may have resulted from whole life insurance policies. Besides, reports may also confirm that the success of critical illness cover could have been as a rider benefit. The rider benefit proved to be effective as it may have matched consumer needs appropriately and may have also enabled providers to get more value from each sale.

Moreover, as per Swiss Re Life & Health, 2000, critical illness policy sales in contrast with regular life insurance policies may have been significant. It could have raised from 3.5 percent in 1991 to 23.6 percent in 1998. Therefore, someone could immediately have the idea that critical illness cover meant successful business at that time. But that was not the case. Around 85 percent of critical illness policies may have been riders to whole life, endowment or term insurance. The remaining 15 percent were more likely to be stand alone critical illness policies. Moreover, out of the 85 percent, 40 percent may have been term insurance, 12 percent could have been whole life insurance and 48 percent may have been endowment policies. The average sum insured could have been GBP 47,000 on term insurance, GBP 68,000 on whole life and GBP 35,000 on endowment policies.

Furthermore, as per Somerville S, 2000, one of the possible reasons to mark the popularity of critical illness may have been due to its combination with mortgage insurance. The sales of critical illness policies may have been an easier task with mortgage included. Succeeding to pay the mortgage even though a critical illness had occurred may have been relatively simple to explain to people. As a matter of fact, this may have thus caught the attention of many people. Also, the cost of adding critical illness cover to mortgage may have been relatively low. This may have then attracted consumers as sales may have been booked. Therefore, this led to 14 percent of mortgage insurance sold with critical illness cover of the total mortgage policy sales in the year 1994. By the year 1998, the rate of critical illness cover used as a rider to mortgage may have increased to 42 percent.

Additionally, According to Somerville S, 2000, term insurance with mortgage combined with critical illness cover may have also been successful. Term insurance with critical illness may have been used since the year 1980. Here again mortgage may have been needed to increase the popularity of term insurance with critical illness. Therefore, it was not until the year 1996 that this type of policy became well known by people as brokers used it alongside with mortgage insurance. Mortgage related term insurance with critical illness demands may have now increased over the insurance market. Mortgage related term insurance with critical illness may represent 43 percent of the insurance market.

The growth of critical illness cover may be expected to continue for years that remain to come. Whether new product designs would appear or there would be a decrease in critical illness cover still remains to be seen.