The bailout plan failed initially because the public would rather take a short-term financial hit themselves than reward the power elite who have been fleecing us for years. The public is sick and tired of trickle-down economics, and the outcry was just too loud for representatives to ignore.

So congress needs to figure out a way of getting cash back into the credit market in a fashion that is quick and fair to the public. So, here it is:

What we should do is take the $700 billion and pay down the mortgages of all the homes purchased between a certain time period, (let's say 2000 when the real estate prices started going wild and 2006, when they really started going down). That's it. That's how simple it is.

Well, I realize it isn't that simple, and I anticipate some of the issues below to factor in, but first, let's see how this solves the problem.

I did some poking around at the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) website and discovered that there were roughly 26 million homes sold between 2004 and 2007. Now let's estimate that there were about 35 million sold between 2000 and 2006 (pretty rough estimate, but in the ballpark, I'm sure). Dividing into the $700 billion, that comes out to an average of about $20,000 per home. With an average home value of $200,000, that means about 10% of the home value. Are we on track?

What does all this mean? That means, if you bought a home for $200,000, the Bailout Commission writes a check for $20,000 that gets applied right to your mortgage. You paid $500,000, your mortgage holder receives a check for $50,000, etc... So the first result that happens is the lenders are all of a sudden flush with cash. They pay their obligations. The credit markets unfreeze. Financial institutions get back to business. (Hopefully not business as usual!).

Meanwhile, you're content, right? You may not have received cash to spend but your mortgage is reduced significantly. If you bought a home during those years you're probably still in the red, but not as much as before. So you'll still have to take some hits, but it will definitely soften the blow. You're less likely to foreclose and you feel more hopeful for the future.

OK, before everybody starts tearing the idea apart, I'll point out some of the potential objections:

1. It's Socialism! - Yeah, I guess it is. And there will definitely be some idealogues who will object to it on that level. But somehow I think those objections will come from the people who don't benefit from the plan. I have a feeling the 40 million or so families who get those mortgage payments will be able to live with it.

2. That's not right... It's not fair! What about all the people who bought homes before 2000? - Are you serious? You've enjoyed 6 years of super-low interest rates and hyper-appreciation. And now you want this mortgage reduction payment as well? In the name of fairness? Please. And as for those of you who bought a home after 2006 when the market was already going down, well, I'm sorry, but that was just not too bright. You don't deserve a break.

3. I don't get it... It's too complicated. How do we figure out who gets how much? - We may need to come up with some fancy formulas, but I actually think it will be pretty straightforward. It's just a flat percentage of the purchase price of the home across the board for everyone.

What other some other objections do you see with this bottom-up bailout plan? Let me know! And if everyone else thinks this is as simple and effective as I do, let's push it on our representatives.

Disclosure: In the interest of full disclosure, I should divulge that I am among those who would benefit from this plan, so I do have an agenda, but at least it isn't a hidden agenda.