While proponents of Prop 102 encourage every individual to uphold and honor their own beliefs in regards to this proposition, there seems to be much confusion associated with the intentions of Prop 102. With this in mind, it is recommended that every person develop their own opinion based on the actual facts before casting a vote in November.

While Prop 102 does seek to clearly define marriage as being the union between a man and woman it does not seek to deny benefits to any individual, couple or group. This has been a major point of confusion for many people, but it should be pointed out that by defining the term "marriage" as the union between a man and woman Prop 102 does not prevent any individual from living the way they choose to live. Moreover, Prop 102 does not seek to limit anybody's benefits or rights. The fact is the proposition has nothing to do with rights in any way.

Prop 102 only aims at passing an absolute definition of the word "marriage," any other purpose or intention assigned to the proposition is done at the error of the assigner. Prop 102 is only 20 words long and strictly regards the definition of marriage? nothing more.

Prop 102 reads as follows: "Only the union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state." Prop 102 appears on the ballot this November for the sole purpose of maintaining the traditional definition of marriage and in no way seeks to restrict the rights of any individuals.

Another misunderstanding surrounding Prop 102 is the belief or concern that it is the same as Prop 107 which did not pass in 2006. While Prop 102 and Prop 107 are similar to each other, there are some very notable differences. Prop 107 includes the following; "No legal status for unmarried persons shall be created or recognized by this state or its political subdivisions that is similar to that of marriage." The opposition of the proposition viewed this to be an attack on the domestic partner benefits of unwed individuals. Prop 102 contains no such confusion. It only seeks to define marriage as the union of one man to one woman and has no connection to domestic partner benefits.

Contrary to the beliefs of many people, the supporters of Prop 102 include individuals from all cultures, religions and political sides. The idea is current that the proponents of Prop 102 are limited to conservative groups and religious enthusiasts, but the fact is advocates of the proposition can be found just about anywhere.

Prop 102 is not liberal vs. conservative issue, or republican vs. democrat issue. It's about maintaining the traditional definition of marriage. And that's all it is. The proposition doesn't seek to deny rights or prevent freedoms for any individual or group.