Creation isone topic that has been well studied for many centuries.Not just one viewpoint on creation has beendevised but so many that it would take pages to outline their individualapproaches.Looking back into history inthe times where gods were formed in the stars, to present day theories of godcreating life through spiritual ideology and also to extend to a more physicalapproach of life being created materially through an evolutionary approach,from cells to formation of all life on earth from one core form.Each theory has its own viewpoint andapproach that looks at life to suit its own goals and objectives.
When welook at creation there is one thing that is undeniable and that is that wereally do not have it wrapped up around our little finger, on how to pinpointan exact time and place when creation was formed.We follow belief structures with fullunderstanding that we are but the creation and not the all knowing of why itexists.
Each theoryhas its own logical approach, looking at creation from its own creative andsubjective methodology, with the essence of each theory focusing on the humanbody and how the earth is formed.Sometheories also extend to the mind and seek truth in romantic and poetic storiesthat relate to love, light and just generally being happy and content with theoverall position that we are all placed within.Except for a lot of scientific approaches each organized creation theorystems mostly from a story form approach, each showing a line of creation thatis formed by an ideal of the human mind.
I supposethe real question to ask when viewing all the individual approaches of creation:what was the original intention of this viewpoint?Whether that be to acknowledge that there isan omnipresent being that created us from a place far more divine than anythingthat we could even comprehend, or that we are merely formed but of matter thatchanges as the years go by.Each methodof viewing creation definitely has its own beauty and individual creativeapproach, none without a fault in trying to find the reason for existence.
All theories stand on their own podium of strong opinion and purpose, notone with limit to reach a desire to understand and justify its approach.The only downfall that could be noted is wheneach theory comes into contact with one another.It is then that the podiums start tocrumble.Instead of finding undeniablelinks between each approach, we choose to debate each limited ideal until theend of time, even after we find that such passion can lead to fighting andviewing creation from the opposite viewpoint to which we seek.How can such things be overcome?Will we ever find an agreeable approach thatdoes not have to hinge on an individuals creative potential.
One thingthat is seen when viewing many of the approaches of finding reason in creationis that our focus is as time goes by limiting itself to ideals of human socialacceptance.Many things are forced tothe wayside if they do not fit into a group acceptance instead of being seensubjectively and in its own beauty and form.Rules and guidelines are setup so stringent that the makers also feelthemselves forced into a cage of redemption, leading to their own individualundoing.They wish to hold to theirbeliefs so strong without questioning their original purpose, but only toenforce without first contemplation and solution.Their ideal becomes then their purpose andwhen they are under attack they seize up and protect themselves with shields ofrigid viewpoint to push away new concepts and approaches.
Sometimesalso these new concepts and approaches have also their own basis of crumblingpodiums.They too are looking for waysto build themselves up to achieve understanding, and a strong undeniable truth,that they hope will be still standing at the end of the day after all the workthat has have done to try and convince others of their purpose.
What ifcreation itself was not in the individuals desire to create purpose forthemselves?We all seek answers that wehope is the only truth standing from viewing each individual standpoint.The only other thing that we can really knowto be truth is also that we will inevitably die one day out of the body to whichwe are formed.These two truths are allthat we have to hold us up.They are ourright and left foot, the only thing that we can be certain of.We all seek answers at some point in our life,but what are we really asking for?
One thingis for sure, individually we are not really seeking an answer for why creationis formed, but really an answer to what is our purpose as humans.We want to know what we are to be doing andwhat we are to be achieving.Every personhas the desire within them to want to know why they should even exist in thefirst place, but not to only acknowledge the beauty of the creation itself butto know why we endure all that we experience.What if creation had no real foundational purpose, would we then want toknow the truth?
Thefoundational elements of creation really would not in all essence have the samegoals as the creation itself.Theseelements have a place outside the human physical world.They are not the creation but the creator.When people base ideas on creation they knowthat the foundation elements are this ?creator? and draw in on human ideals inorder to form their formational model.It makes perfect sense to see creation this way.Seeing as we as humans only know so far thebasis of this world alone and what we see with our eyes around us.The only thing that could be seen as lackingis that we cannot see beyond such limited concepts.We base all on our own self focus and thinkthat we are but the center of all, but is this so?
If we wereto draw on all creation theory and look at creation for its foundation ratherthan its purpose how would it then be viewed?It would for sure have a basis far outside this singular limited worldthat we now know and isolate ourselves within.Would creation not be far reaching beyond even human reasoning andincorporate all possibility?
One thingis for sure, the elements that created us, are not us, but the foundationalembodiments to which we are made from.Itwould be very logical to see creation in such a way.Such a viewpoint would never change in itsapproach, because the ?created? is always a product from the ?creator?.This would have to be a simple foundationfact.If this were to be so then howwould we ascertain what this creator is and how creation is formed?
If we takea known example from our world of an event that takes place, we know for surewith our logical minds that the effect follows after a causal event.When certain things happen within our worldwe understand then that it makes a change in the environment around us.It is thus then from the effect that thecause can be understood.Would we notthen know the creator from understanding the components of the created?If we can ascertain what takes place then itis only logic to see that we can ascertain also why it takes place.There is always a reason, if there is anevent taking place.This is anotherundeniable fact and one that will never change.
That wouldthen reason that creation can be known, we are the effect from a cause, and wecan learn why it all happened, whether or not it makes reason to why weexist.It is all just in understandingthe practical nature of creation, to seeing that it is far more than just astory being told.It is even far morethan a rule that makes us conform within society.It is far more than even popularity.There is a core truth, that when it is found,it will hold tall and be understood by all in its core essence no matter how itis creatively relayed to others.In thecore essence all belief has a foundation.When this core essence is known then nothing is right or wrong and allbelief can be utilized to its full creative potential.