Often when I am reviewing a digital camera I will compare to other cameras at the same time and test them against each other. I have to say at the outset that I have had some difficulty in the past with Cuddeback cameras when it came to missing pictures. I am happy to say that it looks like Cuddeback has solved this problem and that is good because something like that can turn people away from your product. Set in a similar setting, the Capture took only a few less than a more expensive competitor so points to Cuddeback for cleaning this up.
Operation of the Cuddeback Capture
Overall, the operation is not that bad. The camera is easy enough to figure out but it has this one issue that is a real nuisance. The screen keeps saying Do Not Remove Card when I am switching modes. More than once I have found myself telling the camera out loud that I know! I will not remove the card! Most of us will know not to remove the card at this time but for those that don't, maybe there is a less frustrating method of letting us know. That is just my opinion.
One other thing that needs a little more engineering is the system that is used for putting this camera on a tree. Many companies struggle with this and Cuddeback is no exception. In fact they are pretty poor. If you are setting this camera up in the forest, make sure that you bring a selection of bungee cords to do the job. The straps that come with it are just not worth fighting with.
Picture Quality
The picture quality of the Cuddeback Capture is acceptable. If you get good lighting during the day it will take a good picture for you. The problem comes when you have an animal set off the sensor either during dawn or dusk. The pictures taken at these times were really washed out. I could get an idea of what the animal looked like but this is something that needs to be improved. You need a camera that can take decent pictures 24 hours a day or you are just not getting all of the information that you want.
The Cuddeback Capture does not have the ability to take video. I am not on the same page as some of my friends on this subject. Personally, I don't see much use for video in a field camera, I find that it just uses up too much of my memory and once I have an image of the animal, then that is sufficient. I do not need to see a little movie of every animal that is passing through. If this is something you want then you had better move on to something more expensive. If it is not, then this might be a good option for you because the video capability will drive up the price a little.
The Cuddeback Capture is not bad; it will take decent pictures and has enough functionality to get the job done. If you want to save money or if you want to use multiple cameras it might be a good option. If you want the best picture quality, you may want to move up a model.
Wildview Digital Scouting Camera
I have tested some of the Cuddeback products in the past and I have had mixed success with them. For the most part they have been decent cameras but the image quality was fair and I had some problems with the mounting system that they used. I was anxious to see if they had made improvements on some of these issues.
The Image Quality
The images taken by this camera are a little better than the previous 3.0 model. They are not the quality that I get from my Sony Cybershot but that is not the use that they are intended for. I would rate the image quality somewhere between fair and good. It is sufficient for using as a field camera to research the deer I want to track. You might have some trouble blowing up or cropping images but overall it is not bad.
The Trigger Speed
In my opinion maybe the most important feature of a field camera is its ability to capture images quickly. I have been using field cameras for some time, and the early generation cameras were painfully slow. Some of them were even over five or six seconds. This is one area where the Cuddeback Expert absolutely excels. This is actually the faster camera I have ever used in terms of its trigger speed and that is a big plus. Those early generation cameras took plenty of pictures of the forest by itself, and often I could not tell if the sensor was just picking up movement of branches or if the camera was trying to capture a buck moving quickly through the focus of the camera. I have to give credit to Cuddeback for maintaining great trigger speed on its cameras.
Batteries
The Cuddeback Expert takes four D size batteries. The battery life is about four weeks on this model. The manual tells me that when the battery level indicator gets to one then the batteries should be replaced. When it was at one, it seemed like it was out of juice. It did take a fair amount of pictures but the life of the batteries could be improved upon. If you are planning on using rechargeable batteries then you will see the battery life cut in half so it is probably not advisable unless you plan to be checking on your camera very often.
Other Features
One thing that has been a contention for me is the equipment that comes with many field cameras for setting them up on the tree. Cuddeback has been no exception to this rule, although the current set up is an improvement on the former. You can padlock the case closed which is good, but they could improve the strap system even more if they wanted to really make this an easy to use unit.
Overall the picture quality is ok with this camera, the functions are actually pretty good and the trigger speed is outstanding. The cost of these cameras remains low, so if you are getting into the field photography I would suggest that this one is worth a look.
Jenn Jamie has sinced written about articles on various topics from Family Concerns, Food and Drink and Home Management. The picture quality of the is perfect available at http://shop.eaglearchery.com. Jenn Jamie's top article generates over 550000 views. to your Favourites.
12 Inch Notebook Computer If you havent conformed to a simpler way of life yet, then just hop online and you will see a number of possibilities in order to purchase your first laptop notebook computer. You wont be sorry!