Wanting to have more free time doesn't make a person lazy. It might just be a sign that the person is unusually smart. That is evidenced by his or her ability to break away from the mentality of the herd and think independently. The herd mentality leads us to work hard and long in order to make a living and supply our family's needs.



Is there a fact of life that proves that working hard and long is the standard that measures our attitude?

What is the basis for which we are paid? Isn't it our production? Therefore, my consultations focus on leading a person to produce more with less time, and enabling him/her to earn their pay for the required production, just as the person who works longer to achieve the same level of productivity does.

I would like to suggest that the person who produces more in less time is definitely not lazy. He or she is, in fact, more productive, smarter and not as lazy than his or her counterpart who just eases along all day to produce requirements that can be done in much less time.

Another thing to consider, as we compare working harder for equal, or even less results, is that all that time spent working, or standing around & making excuses to yourself and avoiding the work until there is no other choice, is that this excessive activity reduces one's ability to think creatively. Working just to fill time is stressful, wastes time and restricts creativity because it is unbalanced.

Look all around you and within yourself and you will observe that life is basically cyclical. There are cycles of work, rest and recreational activities. All are necessary for happiness and fulfillment. If you work all the time, you become ineffective and counter-productive. If you rest all the time, you're sure to become a lazy sluggard and if you play all the time you will likely become bored and disdain your excessive hedonism. The obvious evidence clearly shows a balance in life.

After the requirements of our work are accomplished quickly and effectively, we then are able to claim some time for relaxing activities, and it is during these periods of relaxation, when doing things we enjoy that we are most likely to be inspired to creative action. This may lead us to invent something, or to paint or photograph a really gorgeous picture, write a song, enjoy our family more, etc. This non work time is more likely to make us creative and make a greater contribution to our work or to society.

Let me not forget to mention that when it is actually necessary to work longer hours, it cannot be avoided, but remember, our value...our pay and benefits are, in the final analysis, tied to our production, not just the time we hang around the workplace. Think of your dentist. Would you want his pay to depend on how long and hard he worked on your teeth? Wouldn't you rather he finished quickly and effectively? Or would you complain and tell him he needs to work longer and harder for the amount of his bill?

Let's avoid the idea that working less is a symptom of laziness, unless the person is shirking his overall responsibility. Remember that every worker and businessperson works for incentives. If there were no profit, the businessperson would not operate a business and if there were not a favorable combination of life needs provided, the businessperson wouldn't find people to work and make it possible for him to produce more and make more profit.

When we realize that people work for incentives and do other things for fun, doesn't it make sense to reward those, including yourself, who produce more in less time with extra time off, without a reduction in pay? I pose this question assuming that you want a work force of cheerful, motivated people. If we only produce more only to enable us to work longer and harder to produce more with the time saved, we are losing our balance and getting back into the vicious cycle that may lead us to join 26% of American workers who have had or are about to have a nervous breakdown.