And well you may, but strategy as a concept is just like love: much used and little understood. Many businesses (and that includes small entrepreneurs, large corporations, non-profits, community organizations, governments, NGOs...the works) neither know what strategy really is, nor how to get one.
And even if you do, in fact, have a strategy -- is it the right one? The best one? This is so important -- marketing guru Jay Abraham says -- and I agree -- a superior strategy badly executed will beat a bad strategy well executed, any day.
It's easy to say, "This is big company stuff. We know what we need -- why should we do all the extra work." While a "strategy-less" group of marketing tactics may work well and produce good results, is it taking your business in the best direction? You may be making money, but are you making the most money possible? Could another suite of tactics implementing a superior strategy produce far better results?
Which brings me to the point of this two-part article: how to formulate strategy. In the next 1500 words, I'm going to present the first half of a basic system for identifying high-impact strategies in your business. (Just the first half? Yes. While I strive to make this as simple as possible, it still takes a bit of explaining, and editors and readers alike detest long articles!) So Part 2 will finish the outline, and in future articles, I will discuss each system component in finer detail.
Let's begin with a working definition of strategy.
Strategy is the guiding principle on which are based a series of interlinked decisions regarding the selection and deployment of resources and tactics, whose purpose is realizing a vision and achieving decisive objectives in a competitive and changing environment.
This definition tells us a few things:
* The purpose of all strategic decisions is achieving your vision and "decisive" or critical-to-purpose objectives.
* Strategy is about selecting specific resources and tactics to get the desired result.
* Strategy is not static; it is decisions in a series, and evolves continuously over time.
* Strategy is broad and all-encompassing. With that in mind, here are the 8 steps in formulating strategy:
1. Set your vision
2. Gather environmental and competitive intelligence
3. Take stock of your organization's strengths and weaknesses
4. Select your "grand strategy"
5. Establish decisive objectives
6. Rate and rank your "SWOTs"
7. Match your internal and external factors to identify strategic alternatives
8. Select specific strategies for implementation
Of course, there is one last step: turning your strategy into tactics and game plans, and execute. We won't get into that in this article.
Step 1. Establish your vision.
People complicate the idea of vision. A vision is simply a story describing how you want things to be in the future. Some people can tell these stories easily -- they know exactly where they want to be and what it will "look" like.
Others need help. The best approach is to answer a series of questions regarding what your organization does, who are it's clients or beneficiaries, what its impact is, how big it is, where it is, how it operates, when all these things will occur, and so on. As a result of answering these questions, your vision will emerge.
Of course, you may already have a vision. If so, now is the time to insure that it is relevant and powerful.
The test of a good vision is if it inspires; not only you and your management team, but all of your stakeholders: your partners, employees, clients, investors, vendors, lenders, your community, your government-and perhaps the public at large. A great vision inspires, and it also provides direction. Every action you take should further your vision. If it doesn't, don't do it.
Step 2. Gather environmental and competitive intelligence.
To develop the best strategies you must understand the world outside your organization. Quantify and qualify, not just absolutes, but trends. And importantly-identify changes in the status quo. Key areas for focus include competitors, technology, market size and trends, your clients' industry health, macroeconomic trends, availability of key resources (people and materials) government regulations and other political considerations, and changes in demographics and psychographics -- like customer taste.
Devise relevant measures for each of these key external areas. For instance, examine your competitors for revenue, profit and market share growth (or decline), product and service changes, shifts in marketing and sales strategy, changes in geographic distribution, strategic alliances, and major customer announcements.
Macroeconomic factors include the obvious such as interest and employment rates and trends, production and consumption statistics, along with finer grained-industry issues such as new home buying-which impacts a wide variety of businesses, or defense spending-which impacts a completely different set of sectors.
Step 3. Take stock of your organization's strengths and weaknesses.
Now it is time to shine the light on your organization. Examine each functional area looking for strengths and weaknesses. Identify strengths that will help the company realize its vision, and weaknesses that will impede its goals.
The following is a starter list of focus areas:
* Ability to get new prospects (Marketing)
* Ability to get new clients (Sales)
* Products and services, both existing and those in R&D
* Finance or Money, including cash flow, access to capital, revenues, profits, ROI
* Leadership, including values and vision alignment, decisive objectives
* People, including skills inventory, staffing levels, employee loyalty, compensation
Other areas to examine include:
* Client satisfaction
* Client services
* Logistics
* Competitive positioning
* Unique Client Proposition
* Management team
* Administration
Step 4. Select your Grand Strategies.
This "grand strategy" approach is based upon industry/product revenue growth rates. It is specific to a business unit with one major industry and/or product focus. If your business is more complex, you may repeat the process for each focus sector.
First, consider your industry and product sector growth rate. Is it growing or declining?
Second, consider your competitive strength within that sector. For this analysis Competitive Strength has two components, the size and trend of your market share, and your organization's financial strength; specifically either cash flow from operations, or access to capital.
To simplify: strong market share + strong finances = strong competitive position. Either strong market share or strong finances = average competitive position. Neither strong market share nor strong finances = weak competitive position.
This defines a two-by-three matrix of strategic choices from which to select your grand strategy.
The exact choice you make will be dictated by the specifics of your situation: sector strength and competitive strength, along with your stated vision and purpose. Choose from the list which best describes your business:
Strong sector, strong competitive position
This means that you are in a growing market, hold a commanding market position, and have cash with which to maneuver. Your strategic choices include:
* Market strategy to increase demand and sales for existing products and services, in existing and new markets
* Marketing strategy to increase market penetration for existing products and services and capture greater share
* Enhance or extend existing products and services; add-ons, backends, strategic joint ventures
* Gain control over distribution - bring external sales inside. Take sales from distributors
* Gain control over suppliers Acquisition, merger, or joint-ventures with competitors
* Develop strategic partnerships to increase distribution, or gain new products
* Develop related products and services for existing customer base - backend strategies
Strong sector, average competitive position
Here you are in a growing market, but have either a commanding position, but limited cash-or vice versa. The exact choice available to you depends on your situation. You can:
* Seek underserved niches: move into small, defined and profitable markets
* Marketing strategy to increase market penetration for existing products and services and capture greater share
* Enhance or extend existing products and services; add-ons, backends, strategic joint ventures
* Strategic partnerships - seek products/services for existing customers
* Exploit assets via joint ventures and host-beneficiary relationships
* Develop related products and services for existing customer base - backend strategies
* Increased marketing penetration via distributors and 3rd parties
* Get more money: raise capital via debt or equity
Strong sector, weak competitive position
You are in a strong sector, but have relatively small market share, and limited or no cash. Your choices include:
* Seek underserved niches: move into small, defined and profitable markets
* Marketing strategy to increase market penetration for existing products and services and capture greater share
* Strategic partnerships - seek products/services for existing customers
* Develop products and services for existing customer base - backend strategies
* Sell your client base to a competitor or cooperator; or reposition your existing products to appeal to new customer types
* Sell the product line and use cash to reposition remaining assets
* Sell the company
Weak sector, strong competitive position
In this case, you dominate a weak market and have cash to exploit your position. You should:
* Add related products and services for existing customer base - backend strategies
* Add un-related products and services for existing customer base - backend strategies
* Add new products and services for new customer base
* Create joint ventures in unrelated markets
Weak sector, average competitive position
You are in a mediocre position in a weak market. Depending on your exact circumstances, you can retreat, use what's left of your cash to buy your way out with new products, or try to enroll a strong partner. Choices include:
1. Reduce costs however you can
2. Add related products and services for existing customer base - backend strategies
3. Add new products and services for new customer base
4. Seek to dominate the smallest definition of your market using low-cost / no-cost strategies
5. Create strategic partnerships and joint ventures
Weak sector, weak competitive position
Sorry to say, you are in a bad place. In a word -- retreat! You can do this by:
1. Reduce costs however you can
2. Sell product line
3. Sell company
If you don't want to liquidate, seek to expand your marketing using low-cost / no-cost marketing strategies - but this may be a losing proposition
Also, as above, attempt to create strategic partnerships and joint ventures, but it may be difficult to attract partners to a market with poor fundamentals. At this point you might say, "...sell the customers? Sell the company? No way. I'm holding on." That just isn't a strategic point of view.
Strategy says you can make more money doing something else -- so you best start thinking about it.
In general, these choices are listed from most attractive to least. Your organization's best choices will be based on your particular circumstances.
By now you have formulated a vision, gathered analyzed your external environment and organization, identified relevant strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, and begun to zero in on a grand strategy. That should keep you busy for a while.
In The Secrets of Strategy, Part II, we'll complete the process.
Remember-you don't need a strategy. But having one increases your chances of generating the greatest profits from your resources. After all, that is the whole point of strategy.
(c) Copyright Paul Lemberg. All rights reserved
1 2 California Gold
It's Vegas time again (God, time goes fast when you're making money) and 40,000 +++ of our closest friends will be congregating to wheel, deal and have a great time eating, drinking and being merry. What a fantastic business we're in; being paid to eat, drink and gamble (whether it's on your property or at the tables).
I "think" this is my 35th convention (I'm VERY old), and while the current shows aren't as much fun or as wild as the conventions 30 years ago (but then again, I'm not as much fun or wild as I was 30 years ago) they're more productive; we all know what we're doing or at least think we do; 30 years ago we winged it. Most of you will arrive on the scene on either Sunday or Monday morning and leave sometime on Tuesday, a waste in my opinion, since staying until Wednesday can make the show more productive for all involved and increase the probability of making a deal. I write this every year and every year the show is desolate on Wednesday after 11, so some things never change.
Either way, 2006, so far, has been an excellent year for all those involved. In addition, the regional dealmaking shows have been growing even faster than in the past, with attendance increases of ten percent or more not uncommon (I'd guesstimate a 7% to 10% increase for Vegas, and considering there were 40,000 attendees last year that's a big increase) and some shows have had a 25% increase. The only negative on the horizon is the apparent slowdown in leasing.
This is a make-or-break show for retailers and developers needing additional stores opened for Christmas 2006. If you can't get on the fast track by the end of this month the odds are that no store will open until 2007. In reality, the vast majority of 2006 deals are already done, with few retailers having an open to buy for the remainder of the year. But there's always a few stragglers who either NEED, or want, another deal for this year, so if you have vacancies (and there's not a lot around) this is the time and place to hustle, otherwise the deals started here will be opening in 2007.
I have to give leasing agents credit for being aggressive when it comes to scheduling meetings for the show. For the last month, I've been bombarded with e-mails and phone calls trying to set up meetings. In the vast majority of cases, I declined, since the projects offered were of no interest to our clients. Everyone is trying hard to fill up their dance cards so they can impress the boss, but meeting for the sake of a meeting makes no sense to me. Of course, if they were really smart they'd leave a few hours every day to just walk the show, do basic networking and see what's new instead of wasting unnecessary time on unproductive meetings. This year will be easier than next, when the convention floor will be doubled in size and most of the exhibitors or attendees will be lost or confused by the vast size of the exhibit hall. Yes, having a larger exhibit area will benefit all, but I personally prefer to shop Ace Hardware over Home Depot because the size is easier to maneuver. Of course I'm not getting as good of a selection, but sometimes I'm lazy.
Ranting on...I'm not going to go into the details of the Mills Company and their problems since we've all heard and read what's happening with that REIT (and probably more will come out by the time this is published), but I will comment on Mill's desire to mix entertainment with retailing, which doesn't appear to be working or at least profitable (and in a capitalistic business, if it isn't profitable it isn't working). If you look at the history of entertainment in shopping centers, it's a checkered past, mixed with lots of failures, whether it be Discovery Zone, Jeepers, indoor skate parks, roller coasters, or whatever, or the fact that movie theaters have been in and out of retail projects for over 20 years. One year, developers think theaters should be included in a center's mix; the next year they're buried in the back with no viability (the only way theaters could become profitable was by going bankrupt a few years ago).
Few entertainment complexes combined with conventional retailing work and I don't believe that will change in the near future. The difference today from when I put roller rinks into centers 30 years ago is that the costs and risks are substantially higher. When I did a roller rink deal 30 years ago, the rent was usually under $4 GROSS and that was for a vanilla box. Today, the Mill's project in North Jersey will cost billion$ to develop and no one knows if the entertainment aspect will be the attraction and profitable as projected. Today it's not uncommon to develop entertainment beside mixed-use and baseball parks, where the costs will run into the hundreds of million$, and again I don't think it will work. (Of course, if you can convince some foolish city to provide millions of taxpayers' money to the project, it does improve the probability of success). Entertainment is NOT a high sales per sq.ft. generator and you don't have to be Einstein to understand that if your development costs are high, your rents have to be in the same league. Overall, entertainment retailers can't afford high rents and that's where the problem lies. I also think the industry is getting itself into trouble with many of the high-end, mixed-use projects, especially ones promoting residential housing in a cooling housing market. (Somehow I can't justify spending $500,000 for a condo located in a retail/office complex. I don't want to live where I shop). One of the industry's current problems is that money is so easy to raise today; developers who sign non-recourse mortgages are willing to try any idea THAT MIGHT work (it's not their money, so who cares because they get leasing, development and management fees no matter what).
Changing topics...friends don't let friends buy centers at a 5% or 6% CAP rate. Even with leasing activity slowing, the market for acquiring centers is still hot (why is another question) and while I predict a slowdown in sales (or an increase in CAP rates in the near future) a few select centers are being sold at 5% to 5.5% CAPs. And CAPs of 6% to 6.5% are not uncommon. Yes, millions have been made in the last five years by "flippers" who kept a center for six to 12 months and then flipped (with no increase in income) for millions more than they acquired the center for. But with a slowdown in leasing and rising interest rates, acquiring centers based on these numbers makes no sense. Remember the dot.com boom, it BUSTED really fast. I believe the same can be true for retail real estate. Pricing of property has gotten so bad that some sellers that normally would have elected to do a 1031 exchange now elect to pay the taxes instead of buying a Walgreens at a 5% CAP, and when you're willing to pay taxes over acquiring real estate there's a problem.
Of course, the other end of the spectrum isn't that rosy either, since I hear a lot of developers complain that with costs so high they're only getting a 10% to 11% return on NEW development. High risk for low reward. The only reason 10% looks good is because of the 6% CAP on existing property. Either way, the leasing mall will be pounded by thousands of buyers and brokers wanting to know if you have a center for sale.
Oh, as I mentioned in the last MyWay, the amount of available space is down substantially over prior years because of the robust economy. But the amount of new construction, especially lifestyle centers and urban redevelopment, is up (we're even involved in an urban redevelopment in Chicago) substantially over last year (merchant developers keep the economy moving whether we need more centers or not) so I highly recommend you walk the leasing mall to see what the current trends are, where they're happening and who the anchors are. It's a good education and will provide ideas for your project.
On a different note, I had dinner with two friends the other day, both of whom are directors of real estate for their development companies. That's where their similarities end. One complained that even though his company has over 12 million sq.ft. of retail, he gets no support from the company's executives; they look at leasing as an expense, not the prime income generator for the company. Whenever he proposes mass mailings, advertising, e-mail blasts or going to local dealmaking shows, they turn him down because of the cost and their belief that "marketing" doesn't work. The other company does their own mailings to ALL their existing tenants, plus the ones in their corporate database (they promote heavily to brokers) and uses outside mailing services to reach "ma&pas," sends thousands of e-mail blasts to promote vacancies and goes to almost as many local dealmaking shows as I do. His company has over 20 million sq.ft. with a vacancy factor of 4%. The other company runs a 6% to 7% vacancy factor consistently. Which company would you rather be? Oh, the "smart" company looks at vacancies as a "cost," and the longer the vacancy the higher the cost, so they're willing to make sweetheart deals on property vacant for a long time while the "other" company says "this is our rent, pay it or don't go into our center."
Both Paul Lemberg & Ted Kraus are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Paul Lemberg has sinced written about articles on various topics from Real Estate, Internet Marketing and How to Sell on Ebay. and Strategist, Paul Lemberg is the President of Quantum Growth Coaching, the world's only fully systemized. Paul Lemberg's top article generates over 14800 views. to your Favourites.
Ted Kraus has sinced written about articles on various topics from Real Estate. Ted Kraus ( ted@dealmakers.net ) is publisher of the Dealmakers, a national newsletter on retailing and real estate in addition to leasing and ma. Ted Kraus's top article generates over 110000 views. to your Favourites.
100 Years Of Innovation The many holiday parks and villages along this part of the coastline expect a bumper year in 2008