Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) pays your loan or credit card interest if you aren't able to keep up the repayments yourself, say if you've been made redundant or can't work due to illness or for whatever reason. You'd think that sounds like a very good thing. Peace of mind that you won't be dragged off to a debtors' prison for missing those vital repayments. Great.
Not so great in fact. With a single premium PPI policy you actually end up paying a lot more interest, as a lump sum gets added to the policy upfront and is treated as part of your loan. That means you are charged interest on the new increased amount of your loan.
These single premium policies have been heavily criticised for being expensive, but also because people aren't helped to understand all the terms, including restrictions on claims, which are buried in the small print. Often part-timers or contract workers find they aren't covered when they bought the policy in good faith.
According to the consumer group Which?, there could be up to two million policy-holders who have not been able to claim on their payment protection insurance. It advises that anyone sold a single premium PPI policy alongside a loan in the past should check in case they may be entitled to a refund.
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has been worrying about customers getting a raw deal with this type of policy and has urged the banks to stop selling them, or rather mis-selling them, as their customers have often been persuaded to take out a policy to cover an unsecured loan and the terms have not been properly explained. A spokesman for the FSA stated, "Customers being sold this type of product should be told how the product works, what it covers and how much it costs - especially as the cost of the PPI is added to the loan and interest charged on this amount."
Some of the big banks including Lloyds TSB, Halifax, Bank of Scotland, Barclays, RBS, NatWest, Alliance & Leicester and Co-Op Bank have taken the criticism on board and have announced that they are ceasing sales of single premium PPI policies. Most banks will continue to sell PPI, but with monthly instalments of the cost rather than a single premium payment.
The FSA is pleased with this step and hope that other banks will shortly follow their example. The demise of the single premium policy is not the end of payment protection policies, nor should it be. The FSA "recognises the importance of appropriate protection insurance in the current economic climate" and spokesman Jon Pain, the FSA's retail markets MD is quite clear about that.
"A PPI product can be helpful for customers wanting protection on a specific credit agreement, as long as the policy is sold appropriately. Consumers can visit our website, Moneymadeclear, to get information on their protection choices and use our tables to compare PPI policies," he says.
The Association of British Insurers (ABI) is keen that all the hype about mis-selling should not put people off buying payment protection in these troubled times, saying, "We think people should think very carefully before doing anything that would leave them without unemployment protection in the current economic climate."
"The ABI believes that PPI is a valuable product where it has been sold properly." In October 2008 unemployment claims on PPI policies soared by 113 per cent compared with October the previous year. This trend looks set to continue. "The ABI and its member companies have been working with the regulator to ensure that when people take out PPI they understand what it costs and what it covers so they can make an informed choice."
A spokesperson for Lloyds Banking Group agrees. "The increased volume of claims we have seen from customers over recent months clearly demonstrates that PPI is a product of real value, offering peace of mind and protection for consumers if their circumstances change and they become unexpectedly sick or unemployed," he said."The ABI believes that PPI is a valuable product where it has been sold properly." In October 2008 unemployment claims on PPI policies soared by 113 per cent compared with October the previous year. This trend looks set to continue. "The ABI and its member companies have been working with the regulator to ensure that when people take out PPI they understand what it costs and what it covers so they can make an informed choice."
A spokesperson for Lloyds Banking Group agrees. "The increased volume of claims we have seen from customers over recent months clearly demonstrates that PPI is a product of real value, offering peace of mind and protection for consumers if their circumstances change and they become unexpectedly sick or unemployed," he said.
Health Insurance For Single
I see agents warning buyers to Beware of Split Limits, as if we might need to wash our hands after purchase.
In reality, this fear tactic is unfounded, as either CSL or Split Limits may or may not be the best choice, because it all depends on the actual amount of the limits, not simply how they are applied in a covered loss.
Combined Single Limits i.e. CSL Limits of $50,000 or $100,000 apply to either Bodily Injury OR Property Damage. In other words, the maximum the insurance company will pay for covered damages that have been deemed to have been caused by you, (your fault) is $50,000 or $100,000. The loss can be all Bodily Injury or all Property Damage or any combination of the two, but the maximum amount covered is $50,000 or $100,000 depending on the amount of coverage you decide to purchase.
Split Limits such as $100,000 bodily injury per person/$300,000 bodily injury per accident/$100,000 property damage means that the insurance company is obligated to pay up to $300,000 in bodily injury claims depending on how many persons are injured & the extent of their injuries AND up to $100,000 in property damage claims.
So insider fans, hypothetically, which would you rather have,
A. $50k CSL or B. Split Limits of $50k per person/$50k per accident/$50k Property Damage? My preference at the bottom
TIP: We recommend a minimum limit of $50,000 Property Damage in case you knock heads with someone else's brand new SUV.
My Preference: B because I would have $50K BI AND $50K PD, a maximum of $100,000 protecting against loss versus $50k to protect against all potential loss in example A.
If you are confused or unsure in any way about about how much exposure you are willing to assume, consult your personal financial or legal advisor. The information above is meant to be used for general educational purposes only.
Both Michael Challiner & Linden Gray are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Michael Challiner has sinced written about articles on various topics from Finances, Advertising Guide and Quit Smoking. You've been made redundant and you're loans re payments are due to be paid, but you have bigger problems! You forgot to pay your monthly PPI installments and now the insurance company will not cover you - you're in debt. You need help. The answer is visit. Michael Challiner's top article generates over 165000 views. to your Favourites.
Linden Gray has sinced written about articles on various topics from Auto Insurance, Finances and Auto Insurance. Linden Gray owner of Mexican Insurance Store is an international insurance veteran with over 29 years of wholesale, retail, and direct insurance experience. Mr. Gray has been featured in numerous offline & online publications including RV Magazine, The Pr. Linden Gray's top article generates over 8100 views. to your Favourites.
Conventional Fire Alarm System The cheapest is about 20.00 , way cheaper than your Nike. You will not be forgiven if fire breaks out because you forgo a 20 fire alarm system