Over recent years the Web has grown into an integral part of every day life. If you're of the same generation as me, born in the 80s, it is hard to imagine life without it. Used for everything from entertainment, mail, news, work, commerce, communication and everything in-between, the Web has found a way to be ingrained in everything we do from day to day.
In my memory the net has gone from simple text html documents on a 28k modem to full streaming video and audio on mobile devices via wireless broadband. The Web isn't all that old though, and the growth has been staggering for the short time that it's been around.
Here I should point out the difference between the Internet and the World Wide Web. The Internet is the series of interconnected networks that provides the backbone for the Web and all other communication technologies to operate. The Web is the series of interconnected documents, typically the web pages that you visit.
Despite the prevalence of the Internet and the Web in almost everything now, it isn't actually very old at all. The technology that powers the Internet is older than the Web, which was actually started in 1990 by Sir Tim Berners-Lee. The Internet was already widely used within academic and military circles in the USA at this point, but what Burners-Lee did was create a means with which people could easily browse documents and access information from their computer. By December 1990 he had created the first browser, WorldWideWeb, as well as the first web pages, which were documents detailing the nature of the Web.
By 1991 web servers began popping up all over the world, and testing had begun on the first universal browser that would allow anyone to access the documents stored on the Web. In 1992 there were 26 servers in the world, and by 1993 there were over 200. In February of that year Mosaic was released, the browser that allowed anyone that owned a PC or a Mac to access the Web. From this point the growth is staggering.
By 1994 Netscape had been formed and released their first browser, Netscape Navigator while Microsoft had released their Windows browser, Cello in 1993. At this stage the Web was still in its infancy, and in May 1994 the first International WWW Conference was held at CERN, a year after they had decided that use of the Web would be free-to-use and royalty-free, a major factor in its success.
By 1995 the ever expanding Web was starting to pick up momentum and gain some attention in the media and popular culture. By this point Netscape Navigator was the most commonly used browser, but Microsoft had licensed Mosaic to use as the basis for their own browser, Internet Explorer, which would be bundled with Microsoft Windows 95 Plus.
New versions of each browser were released in quick succession to keep up with the new technologies and demands of their ever increasing user-base. In 1997 Microsoft released Internet Explorer 4, which was faster than before as well as allowing a much more dynamic display of information. The browser also integrated itself into Microsoft's dominating OS, Windows.
Microsoft would go on to use its monopoly on home operating systems and its massive budget to crush the competition from Netscape in the following years as versions 5 and 6 of Internet Explorer completely dominated the market. Netscape eventually released the source code of Navigator as an open source browser, Mozilla. This would eventually lead to the creation of the Firefox browser, now a significant rival to Internet Explorer.
By 1998 most companies had realised that with all the commercial benefits and opportunities that the Web could bring that a website was no longer optional, but required. This would lead to the much hyped 'dot com' boom and bust of the turn of the century.
Low interest rates in 1998-1999 would help tempt venture capitalists into investing in dot-com businesses that were seeing their stock values rise extremely quickly. This lead to remarkable situations where start-up dot-coms could be worth millions despite never having made a profit, or in some cases never even having taken any revenue.
The boom lasted into the year 2000, where the stock value of the technology rich NASDAQ Index peaked at more than twice its value from the previous year. On March 10th the dot com bubble burst. Massive multi billion dollar sell orders for companies such as Cisco, IBM and Dell were all processed on the March 10 weekend, this selling prompted a chain reaction as investors found themselves past Y2K without incident and so spending was reduced.
The failure was also undoubtedly linked to the poor showing of Internet companies during the Christmas 1999 season. Their lavish spending and valuations now seemed foolish and most of the dot com businesses went out of business throughout 2001.
The fallout of the dot com era was a large amount of overcapacity on many Internet networks, as well as cheaply available high speed broadband. From the ashes many companies did manage to find a successful niche online and started to form stable businesses. Google, Amazon and Ebay are excellent examples of this.
2002 would see the advent of user driven content, and the real start of Web 2.0. Up until this point the Internet was generally something that you could browse and view, but not edit. Websites would be built by companies and organisations with the intent of users reading them from their computers.
As websites such as MySpace and Facebook began popping up, so did the popularity of instant messaging services such as ICQ, MSN and AIM. During the early 2000s the Web would undertake a shift from being commercially driven to being built around interpersonal communication. Many people began seeing the Web as a cheap and easy way of keeping in contact with friends and relatives. As more and more homes were connected to broadband the Web became integrated into the personal computer and the Internet became the primary communication tool for millions.
2002 also saw the advent of the blog and RSS feeds. A blog enabled just about anyone to have their own personal space online that was easily editable. Previously owning and running a website was the domain of people with sound technical knowledge and a grasp of HTML. With blogs just about anyone could start a site and create something where their voice could be heard. This would essentially bring the Web to the masses as people realised that traffic online could be a two-way thing.
Around the same time Google was rising to prominence as the premier search engine. Google would help to organise and clean up the Web for people. Using complex search algorithms Google attempts to rank pages based on their relevancy and reputation. Their streamlined search page enabled users to find what they were after in the sea of content available online much more easily than before.
In 2005 YouTube was founded by three ex-PayPal workers. The website hosts user-uploaded videos in a quick loading format based on Flash that enables people to watch videos on just about anything. YouTube proved to be the fastest growing website in history. The site now hosts 84 million videos, with 3.75 million user channels. YouTube was a significant step forward for the Web and user-generated content.
Since 2005 the Web has exploded with all kinds of user-generated material. Recently it has been social networking sites that have seen the most growth, with Facebook proving to be an international phenomenon. These sites enable users to have a much more personal connection to the Web than previously. With people using the Web as their sole means of communication while sharing photos and video it has become totally ingrained in everything that we do.
As the flood of user-generated content continues to grow it is hard to predict where the growth will stop, if at all. This kind of content is what has enable the Web to reach the point it has reached now. In just 18 years it has gone from the domain of nuclear physicists and computer scientists to the domain of everyone. Even people with little to no computer knowledge can browse web pages, or set up a blog.
It'll be interesting to see where the Web will go next. With Web 3.0 just around the corner many people, including Sir Tim Burners-Lee are predicted the advent of the Semantic Web, where the Web will understand and satisfy the requests of people as they search and surf. I imagine the Internet will merge into every facet of technology and entertainment in the future, even more so that what is happening today.
It is an interesting time and also interesting to note that the reason people buy a computer now is not to compute, but to use the World Wide Web.
History Of World Wide Web
How did the issue of trust become such big thing to the Internet community? The answer probably lies in the story of one of the biggest Internet success story so far – the story of Google, and how it revolutionized search.
Although Google did not invent the search engine, it was the first technology company that successfully created a search engine that gave search results of exceptional quality and relevance. Because of this, users started to become more dependent to the Google search engine in finding information on the Internet. Google became our first destination in our quest for the answers to most of our day to day quest for information. Suddenly we find ourselves searching Google or other search engines for our most personal issues. Questions that normally we're to shy to ask our friends about got their answers from the search engines. As the keywords and phrases that we enter on search engines piles up on their databases, they become more and more of a tell tale of certain aspects of our lives. There would have been no issue if our search queries vanished as quickly as we have asked them, but unfortunately this is not the case. Search engines keep a record of what we search on their search boxes.
The concept of personalization is one of the next big frontiers in the story of search, primarily because this is the one thing that might provide the most significant step towards quest for the perfect search engine – one that gives us exactly what the users are looking for. Search personalization will be the reason why a soccer player will find soccer-related results when he searches for “football” on a search engine while an American football player will find his own set of search results when does the same search. The search results that we will see will be different from what others see because we have differing domains of interest. But first, in order for search personalization to happen, the search engines must keep a profile of all our previous queries for analysis. This is where the problem starts, and it was brought more into the prying eyes of the public when the US Federal Government asked for these search records from the major search engines. Three of the major search engines, Yahoo, MSN and AOL followed the request without questions, but Google questioned the subpoena and legally battled against giving the requested data. Google knew that it had to protect these search records if it wanted protect the company's credibility and to keep its user's trust. Although the information that was being asked by the Government did not contain details that will personally identify individuals, the move nevertheless made the public more aware of the possible dangers of other people accessing a record of their search queries. In the end Google won and was only required to submit a portion of the original data requested, but the fact remained that the actions of the other three search engines is something that customers should be wary of, whether the data contained personally-identifiable information or not. It was more of an issue of the said search engine companies easily caving in to pressure of the government to give such kind of data.
Because of this and the growing concerns about privacy and trust with search engines a survey was done among 800 American Internet users. The survey revealed that most users were unhappy about search engine companies keeping records of their search queries. The majority were also opposed to the idea of the government monitoring user's search engine queries. Not that people only cared now, it's just that many didn't realize the possible implications and dangers of the fact that their search queries were being monitored and kept by the search engine companies.
The scenario of the personalized search fully maximized is not too far off. If this is the future of search, then search engines must gain the trust of its users. The user's fear of saved search queries is not so much about the idea that the search engines are saving it as it is about the dangers of the possibility that these information might get to the wrong hands.
The issue of trust and privacy goes well beyond search though. There is this trend in the computer industry where the software applications that we use are becoming web services rather than stand alone desktop applications. Although this offers the benefit of being able to work virtually anywhere (where there is Internet connection), this also has the serious implication that the user's data will be stored on the Internet rather than on their hard drives. This has already happened widely in email, where web-based implementations are becoming more and more popular. With the advent of next-generation web applications fueled by new technologies and ideas, the concept of the web computer is slowly being realized. Privacy and trust will become more important in the future because then, user profiles will not be the only things that will be entrusted to the Internet companies -- users' documents and files must also be kept safe and secure.
The issue and problems of trust with Internet search engine and the World Wide Web in general is not about to go away. As the Internet industry pushes on to new era of personalization and web applications, the issue of trust will become more relevant. As the industry leader, Google is showing a good effort in building company trust in the minds of the users. Search engine companies and web applications providers must continue to strive to make their systems more secure and robust, and their policies stronger against sharing of sensitive data. Only when users begin to trust these companies will the idea of a web-based operating system be fully realized.
Both Patrick Omari & Danny Wirken are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Patrick Omari has sinced written about articles on various topics from Celebrities, Hotels and Hostels and Science. Patrick is an expert Research and Travel consultant. His current interest is in Gatwick parking at ,. Patrick Omari's top article generates over 823000 views. to your Favourites.