In the start of the film they have to 'bend' the rules to put away a child killer. They both have no qualms about it and follow through and let it be. Then later there are bunch of serial killings of basically guys that pimp, deal dope or any other vile act. Pacino and Deniro see these acts as good for society but their chief wants them to solve them regardless of the fact it keeps streets clean. The killer also leaves poems at each crime scene relating to what the people did to deserve this.
The premise is okay but comes out a little weak with the slow pacing. Deniro and Pacino have good chemistry as always, but that doesn't really redeem the film for me. I expected it to be a faced past murder mystery thriller. Not a take your time roll it over 'Law and Order' style film. I think the producers thought if they had this acting duo they wouldn't need to perfect the screenplay. They didn't use alot of special effects or crazy car chase scenes.
Carla Gugino is Deniro's lover, a little disturbing for the twenty something audiences. It's not the most romantic relationship's; she seems to be using him just cause he wears a badge.
There is a dynamic turn in the story when Walhberg and Leguizamo are introduced as two rival cops. They have it out for Deniro and make his life a living hell. It seems you don't know who to trust in the story and anyone could be the suspect.
The misdirections are okay but not enough to throw most people off the scent of who it really is. If you pick up on little clues you will figure it out about halfway through. I think if you wait for it to come out on DVD you should be fine. It's worth a rental but not quite worth a movie ticket purchase for two or more. It's not a film where you walk out or feel horrible seeing. My thought was okay that wasn't very complicated or intense. Would I see it again? Probably not, once is enough. There is plenty of other great vigilante films.
Kill A Big Daddy
Bigdaddy, Google's new data centre, isn't news to most webmasters; both Search Engine Watch and Webmaster World's forums have discussed the technology since late 2005, and even Google's own Chief Search Engineer Matt Cutts has blogged the topic extensively. Even the reason behind the naming convention (one of the Google staff's kids call him Big Daddy at home) is out in the open.
How Bigdaddy will affect page rankings within Google however, still remains to be seen, although there is a lot of speculation floating around the Net. Mr. Cutt's blog states that the new foundation will improve cannonicalization, which is the computer code that tells a search engine that
www.domain.com
domain.com
domain.com/index.html
www.domain.com/index.html
are all the same web site. It is also reported that the data center will positively impact 302 redirects, which have been a known issue for some time.
What wasn't anticipated with the update though were the chaotic and oftentimes strange behaviors the search engine has displayed, most notably over the past several months. Although some of Google's previously-indexed sites dropping off the face of the engine may be associated with their reported lack of server space and others due to Google's "different datacenters get different data at different times" statement, many of the problems seem surreal, without explanation.
For instance, Webmaster World's forums have reported large SERPS drops, changes in supplemental result handling, "home page only" results and pages dropping right out of the Bigdaddy index, while the Digital Point forums are asking if Google has cleaned their index and why the supplemental problem is reoccurring.
What little information is available on the subject is only the information that webmasters are providing each other; little explanation is coming from Google themselves right now. Some experts have shown that the supplemental deletions across the data centers have been gradual over the past several months, with the idea that perhaps the supplemental results are being deleted to free up server space. Others have noticed the inclusion of longer URLs with multiple variables, such as database-driven pages (which were not previously indexed), and the product-based sites like BizRate and Amazon generating higher search results than previously found.
Right now, the only "fixes" seem to be either contacting a member of the Google team (most notably posting in Mr. Cutts' blog), ensuring your website doesn't fit within the "too similar" Google guideline (as it seems that sites with slightly different page text are doing better than most) or hitting up Google's site for a re-inclusion request. Without more guidance from Google though, there isn't much webmasters can actively do at the moment, other than sit back and watch Bigdaddy work out the search engine-retrieval bugs, talk over the situation with other webmasters, and stay as informed on the subject as possible.
Both Clarke Baldwin & Eddie Sanmarco are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Clarke Baldwin has sinced written about articles on various topics from Video Games, Football and Recreation and Sports. Clarke Baldwin is a journalist who has worked for Dallas Morning News and other publications. You can find his site at and this article at. Clarke Baldwin's top article generates over 22200 views. to your Favourites.