Please, just because you want to lose weight, don't dump your nutritious foods and live on celery sticks and diet sodas. It will hurt you in the long run by depriving you of needed nutrition and fiber.
Instead replace some of your unhealthy foods with healthy foods. You can start a better diet and it will be a low calorie diet compared to what many people have been eating.
Focus on more vegetables in your diet. Especially the leafy green vegetables. Eat 7 or more half-cup servings of vegetables a day. This would mean two or three different servings of vegetables per meal.
Eat a variety of vegetables, with a variety of colors each day. This creates visual appeal, different textures and the good nutrition that you need.
Don't cut them out, but don't use as much of the root vegetables because they are more starchy. Example: potatoes, sweet potatoes.
Drink water instead of soft drinks and fruit juices. This will lower your calories and provide you with the fluids you need for health and weight loss. Yes, water and plenty of it will help you lose weight.
I saw a show in which an obese teenager did not have a clue about calories or nutrition, but she was very willing to learn. Dr. Phil told her that cutting out the sodas the teenager was drinking would allow her to lose 50 pounds of fat in a year. This may apply to you as well, if you drink a lot of sodas.
Be ready ahead of time for snacks. Don't reach for the nearest goodie or candy bar, instead get out the snack you thought about ahead of time. Maybe a little cheese and apple, a piece of fruit, or some cottage cheese with mixed fruit. Keep the serving small - it is not a meal, just a snack.
All of these suggestions give you an idea of how to have a low calorie diet without depriving you of needed nutrition.
Low Calorie Longevity Diet
Have you heard of the Longevity Diet or Calorie Restriction Diet? It's been in and out of nutrition news for many years, the theory and related research starting in the 1930s. The concept is that by eating less total calories and ensuring that the calories we do eat are highly nutritious, we can extend our life span. So what's the science behind this? No one knows exactly, but the research is growing, and so are the numbers of people trying it out.
In the 1930s, researchers studying growth patterns and food deprivation in mice noticed that adult mice that were underfed lived much longer than their well fed counterparts. Since then, there have been studies done on different animals, including primates, with basically the same results: those animals that were fed much fewer "high quality" calories lived longer and had better overall health.
Do you remember Biosphere 2? It was the project where they built a sealed, self-contained facility in Arizona and people lived there for 2 years. Well, the food production part of the experiment didn't go so well yet the participants stayed anyway. It was observed that although they became very thin, their health profiles (particularly the biomarkers of aging: cholesterol, blood sugar and c-reactive protein/inflammation) improved considerably.
This led to the formation of the Calorie Restriction Society by one of the Biosphere 2 members, Dr. Roy Walford. The society aims to raise money for research as well as to educate people on the benefits and risks of Calorie Restriction as a lifestyle. They have renamed the concept: Calorie Restriction with Optimal Nutrition. This is an important distinction, because if one restricts their calories from between 10 to 30%, it is imperative that what is eaten is high quality in terms of nutrition. No junk food allowed!
What have researchers found are the benefits of Calorie Restriction with Optimal Nutrition? Well, in humans it's not an easy research study to design because we live so long and there aren't many people willing to go to such extremes. But there have been some interesting findings.
This year, a research group studied 25 members of the Calorie Restriction Society (aged 41-65) who had been following the lifestyle eating 1400 to 2000 calories per day for an average of 6 years, along with another 25 people who had been eating "normal" American diet of 2,000 to 3,000 calories per day. They measured the diastolic function of all of them. This is a biomarker of age in hearts. The calorie restrictor's diastolic readings were of people 15 years younger.
One research group has been able to prove that calorie restriction in mice slows down death rates, particularly of cancer and kidney failure. Well fed, sedentary lab rats commonly die of these afflictions. They demonstrated that calorie restriction slows down the growth speed of breast, skin and white blood cells... which means a slower tumor growth rate.
One researcher is studying the implications of the fact that calorie restriction lowers the levels of insulin and insulin growth factor ?another cancer trigger. This also can't be bad in the fight for diabetes prevention and control!
And yet another research group is studying the idea that slowing down the amount of energy given to the mitochondria of our cells gives us fewer free radicals (cellular respiration generates free radicals). Hmm... many of us are taking anti-oxidant vitamins to combat free radical damage ? maybe we just need to eat less.
Although the concept really hasn't been studied enough to lend concrete answers, it deserves the attention of those of us who are looking to live longer and more productive lives. Many of the principles put forth by this lifestyle, such as to eat more nutrient dense foods (veggies, fruits, lean dairy, fish, lean meats and whole grains) and eat fewer empty calories (sugar, white flour, white rice and other processed foods), couldn't be bad for anyone!
It's pretty obvious that being overweight is a risk factor for a shortened lifespan, so why wouldn't being mildly underweight lengthen lifespan? It's an idea well worth consideration.
To find out more, check out the Calorie Restriction Society web site at http://www.calorierestriction.org/.
Both Ailen Mark & Ainsley Laing are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Ailen Mark has sinced written about articles on various topics from Aerobics, Health Insurance and Dieting. Ailen Mark writes articles on different topics. To know more about ,. Ailen Mark's top article generates over 3600 views. to your Favourites.
Ainsley Laing has sinced written about articles on various topics from Fitness, Aerobics and Fitness. About the Author:Ainsley Laing, MSc. has been a Fitness Trainer for 25 years and writes exclusively Body for Mind eZine. She holds certifications in Group Exercise, Sports Nutrition and Personal Fitness Training. She is also a professional engineer and mo. Ainsley Laing's top article generates over 110000 views. to your Favourites.
American Psycho Book Review Having said that in view of the import of the thesis presented in no way detracts nor dismisses these vital problems all Americans face