I won't deny participating in such an event myself. For years, this was sold as a beneficial way of building links. Such link exchange services like Linkmetro, BRL, Telalinks, and so on (all of which now useless in my opinion) popped up and started automating the link exchange process.
To those SEO companies that get their ethics and strategies from the tubes (GOP synonym for ?interwebs?) I invite you to visit the law giver. The knower of all things in the search engine optimization ?rightosphere?. I introduce you to Google Webmaster Guidelines.
Google Webmaster Guidelines is where you learn the rights and wrongs of search engine optimization. Don't know where it is? Well, there is no easy way to get there except Googling ?Google Webmaster Guidelines?. Once there, type in ?links schemes?.
A couple bullet points down you will see on the list of do nots ?Excessive reciprocal links or excessive link exchanging ("Link to me and I'll link to you.")?. Whaaaaat? You mean my link partners page is useless? Those countless hours of spamming link exchange partners done in vein? Those beautiful two way links for nothing?
Yep. Life's tough, move on.
In spite of Google putting their opinion of solicited link exchanges in clear view, a walk down Search Engine Optimization Company Lane (a sadly unsafe neighborhood) will show that few are listening. They still advertise ?reciprocal link management? and similar services. Save your time. Blogging, articles, press releases, in short, content based links are still strong and true. As for your link exchanges, well, cut your time loss and move forward.
Of course, what other search engine optimization companies advertise doesn't mean their wait in wasted kilobytes to me. But occasionally, these half informed Google Webmaster Guideline illiterates solicit their phony services to one of our clients. So, occasionally conversations just as this appear.
?Jason, why aren't we doing link exchanges?? Client will ask.
?Waste of time.? I will answer.
?But other SEO's are saying we need link exchanges.?
?They're wrong.?
?But I've heard it from more than one SEO, I need link exchanges.?
I sigh briefly before replying, ?Well, more than one search engine optimization company can be ignorant. It doesn't strike you as odd that you are on the first page of Google without link exchanges??
?But why are these other SEO guys saying I need link exchanges??
The response to that question is of course, ?Well, while I'm sure they know how to read, they choose not to read Google's Webmaster Guidelines.?
The journey to Google's Webmaster Guidelines always seems to disarm their concerns. Reciprocal links are just another SEO tactic of the past that is better off staying there. Write content, build one way links, and by all means, read the rules.
Search Engine Optimization Firms
Try simplifying navigation; adding landing pages that answer specific queries can also transform response.
Offline you can catch mediocre copy and design and change it fast.
If still nothing improves, people go for SEO experts.
However, even with its new found respectability many decision makers find the choice of SEO agents baffling as there is no regulatory body to judge standards.
From a corporate perspective, the only way to view the success of your search engine optimization campaign is from the results it achieves, be that in awareness, more sales leads, or simply communication with your company.
An SEO firm has to balance between their knowledge and the basic premise of what search engines are all about and the subsequent rules and algorithms they live by.
Think of it from the search engine’s perspective, their overall value depends on consistently serving up the most informed and relevant answers to queries their visitors are asking.
This might sound obvious, but then consider how many inferior websites might be in front of yours right now in the search engines, and that’s before you consider those sites which have no place in those results anyway.
The trouble is, wherever there is a code or a system, you can guarantee that some people will try and break it, or at least try and fool the search engines into delivering results that will keep their clients happy.
The truth of it is that getting improved search engine ranking and sustaining the position can only be done ethically by the “white hat" SEO companies, or you can visit the dark side - the so called “black hat" brigade at your own risk.
Take link building, for instance. Here’s a legitimate SEO technique that done properly, will stabilise and grow the popularity of a website as incoming links from relevant and respected websites are seen as a ‘vote on confidence’ in yours. It’s not unusual for a successful, well ranked website to have many thousands of links.
But what happens when your SEO suggests buying links? Or sourcing hundreds of new links from those so called link-farms?
Reciprocal links are an excellent way of building popularity, but again, even this is open to abuse if only low ranking or rather tenuous links are sought from those other companies.
In any case, weak search engine optimisation, or worse, SEO that cuts corners, will compromise results, overall ranking positions and in extreme cases, might even get you bounced from the search engines altogether.
But who is the real victim here?
For sure the SEO agency might lose you as a client, but you have potentially lost much more. First there’s the unknown cost of lost sales leads as those motivated buyers simply haven’t been introduced to your site; but you have also lost something much more precious: time.
Sound, ethical organic search engine optimisation or search engine marketing is a long term commitment and any company gambles with that at their peril.
Both Robert D. Thomson & Diana Gray are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Robert D. Thomson has sinced written about articles on various topics from Dog Care, Real Estate and Dental Practice. Jason Bland is with , Adviatech Corp. Adviatech is one of the leading SEO firms offering results based online marketing soluti. Robert D. Thomson's top article generates over 2240000 views. to your Favourites.
Diana Gray has sinced written about articles on various topics from Marketing and Communications, Search Engine Marketing. Diana is an SEO specialist and a freelance writer. For further information regarding / or. Diana Gray's top article generates over 3600 views. to your Favourites.
Changing Your Game Plan But if those tactics are not founded in Seven Marketing Principles AND if they are not aligned with your marketing game plan, youre putting success at risk