The concept of Six Sigma was first developed by Motorola Corporation as an approach to address the high defect rates within the company's manufacturing processes. With the success of Six Sigma, Motorola has registered the Six Sigma brand name to the corporation. The concept of Six Sigma advocates that data be collected from processes to measure performance and determine the extent of variation from target performance measurements.
This approach had been truly effective in ensuring quality in a manufacturing environment and was later adopted by the services industry during the 90s. However, as the Six Sigma framework relied heavily on the collection and analysis of data of individual processes, synchronizing processes between departments was ignored. This resulted in improvement benefits being limited to specific functions only, without taking into consideration the integration with other processes. Another weakness of the Six Sigma methodology is the lack of control used to sustain improvements achieved. This stems from the fact Six Sigma utilizes manual processes to do this, an approach that lacks effectiveness.
In this sense, Business Process Management (BPM) initiatives address areas that Six Sigma falls short of, in line with the purpose of achieving excellence in organizations. These two methodologies complement each other to compensate for areas of weaknesses. Although BPM addresses process enhancements and monitoring from a holistic viewpoint, it fails to address the analytical requirements required to solve complex issues.
Therefore, BPM approaches are used to define current processes and their role across multiple functions, identify areas within the process that affect critical success factors and develop process improvements for these areas of weaknesses. The identification of gaps between existing processes and ideal processes are addressed with Six Sigma initiatives. Finally, process monitoring, evaluation and continuous improvement measures are implemented with BPM techniques. These are carried out for inter-related processes across the organization.
A step-by-step insight into how a BPM – Six Sigma initiative is implemented
The first step for such an initiative is to define the current processes of a function, with outputs clearly determined. Data is collected to determine the health of the performance of the particular process as compared to predefined targets. If there is a deviation in the performance measured from the particular process, the effect of the deviation may be translated into monetary terms.
Measure
BPM process maps are developed which incorporate various critical elements of the process. These would include business systems, people and resources that are involved in the entire process. The functions performed by each of these elements are defined and utilized in the analysis stage.
Analyze
With all data and information at hand, an analysis is conducted on the business process to determine areas of weaknesses. What are the key courses for the deviation? How does this deviation affect other processes? Which steps of the processes are too slow? Where is the backlog?
The key approach when analyzing existing processes is to identify parts of the processes which were irrelevant or which does not add value to the process. Most of the time, these areas of redundancy are the causes of delay within entire processes. Apart from that, dependency on a cross-functional process may also cause the current process to be inefficient.
Improve
Once weaknesses are discovered, areas for improvement to address these weaknesses will be identified. This would incorporate the use of “what if” hypothetical solutions in order to shortlist several possible scenarios that would work to improve the current process.
Many times, process improvements will include the utilization of automated processes through the use of technology. Human intervention will still be required, but a form of integration between automated and human run processes will be developed.
At this juncture, the utilization of machines or applications for greater efficiency will be customized towards the particular business process. Data flow between automated processes and human operated processes will need to be smooth. Therefore, all variables involved in a process will be taken into consideration during the design stage.
Control
A new process will have limited effectiveness to an organization if it is not constantly monitored for sustainability. This is why a monitoring and tracking system needs to be put in place, most probably in the form of a BPM monitoring system where performance indicators are constantly measured. This way, the management team will be able to react to deviations quickly, and make any amendments whenever necessary. Automated reports will be triggered to managers whenever a specific deviation and review meetings are held to address any process issues.
In conclusion, Six Sigma and BPM when implemented together will produce outstanding results for the purpose of organizational excellence. This is possible through the synergy achieved from these two remarkable methodologies that help to improve organizational performance the world over.
Six Sigma Process Management
While Six Sigma is becoming more popular, a lot of companies still rely upon the conventional Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK). This discipline is used throughout all sectors and has been one of the most pivotal managerial tools for many years. In truth, there are many similarities between the two methodologies. For example, both include identifying problem areas, managing resources, and conducting cost analysis as high priorities. However, while there are parallel goals, there are also distinct differences.
In this article, I'll provide an overview of the differences between a Six Sigma initiative and one that is guided by the Project Management Body of Knowledge. We'll explore how data contributes to both, the role of management and the problems they face, and one of the key areas in which the two standards deviate from each other.
The Value Of Data
Both Six Sigma and project management initiatives are deployed in order to improve existing processes. However, PMBoK assignments often have an inherent weakness: in many cases, they lack a reliable method to measure the results of the process-related changes that are made. In short, there's often no way to quantify the results. Because of this, a PMBoK team may consider their efforts successful, but they lack the data to validate their claim.
By contrast, Six Sigma is a methodology that is primarily driven by data. Processes are analyzed and data is collected. Problems are identified, creative solutions are designed and deployed, and more data is collected. It is only through analyzing the collected data that success or failure of the initiative can be determined.
Problems Facing Management
PMBoK project managers cope with a number of problems for which Six Sigma is designed to resolve. For example, when managers approach a work process problem, they first need to gain an understanding of the issues. Then, they need to design and implement tracking mechanisms through which they can quantify selected variables. Next, they need to collect data and analyze it in order to identify inefficiencies within the process that can be addressed with available resources.
While a professional project management initiative can help managers accomplish those tasks, it is limited in its scope. This is partly due to the methodology's focus upon broad-scale processes using a centralized project office. By contrast, a Six Sigma initiative is more flexible; it provides managers the tools they need in order to do their job within a smaller, decentralized unit.
Ongoing Prevention Vs. Piecemeal Selection
This is one of the main areas in which the two methodologies have very different approaches. Professional project management examines processes on a piecemeal basis. The central project office considers each initiative individually; as one assignment is completed, another is initiated. Neither assignment has any bearing on the other.
Six Sigma takes the opposite approach. Assignments are designed to uncover the root cause of a process-related problem. Once a solution has been implemented and determined to be successful, the goal is to prevent the original failure from recurring over time.
Each Methodology Has A Place
What I've described above is not to suggest that the PMBoK is outdated or irrelevant. In fact, it continues to be a valuable methodology. However, its value is most evident in strategic applications where broad-scale processes are analyzed. On the other hand, Six Sigma is perfectly-designed for assignments that support ongoing review and improvement. The data from each initiative is used to establish benchmarks by which future performance is measured. In short, both methodologies have their place in different circumstances. One does not replace the other. When deployed simultaneously, they can work together for an organization's continual improvement.
Both Thomas Gomez & Frank Lucer are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Thomas Gomez has sinced written about articles on various topics from Six Sigma. . Thomas Gomez's top article generates over 1600 views. to your Favourites.
Frank Lucer has sinced written about articles on various topics from Customer Service, Computers and The Internet and Finances. BMGI, a leading education and consulting firm in the education field regularly posts information on six sigma at http://www.bmgi.com. Frank Lucer's top article generates over 60500 views. to your Favourites.
Black People Meet Online Using people search can really help save your life so use it now before its too late.For more information visit People Lookup