For a few years now, there have been some worries among parents and patients that ADHD medication had more than just short-term side effects on the children taking them. One of the most recent concerns regarding this was the possibility of these medications making children more vulnerable to substance abuse later on in life. These worries have been around for a few years now, with some reports of cases where parents refused the medication for their children out of fear of this development.
The worry over this has had a different effect on doctors, who have very few alternatives when parents refuse to let their children be treated for their ADHD with medication. The worries over a possible vulnerability to later substance abuse came to a head fairly recently, with a few independent laboratories and pharmaceutical companies deciding to find out the truth once and for all.
Two of those teams have published their findings in the American Journal of Psychiatry, in hopes of alleviating the worries of the parents and doctors concerned. One of the teams, headed by Salvatore Mannuzza of New York University, followed a group of 176 subjects for 17 years, all of whom had been prescribed Ritalin as ADHD medication during their childhood years.
The results of the NYU team found that among those who had taken the medication at age 6 or 7, there was the same risk factor of drug or alcohol abuse as young adults. The percentage found was 27%. This is in comparison to a similar group who were not given any form of ADHD medication, with a slightly higher rate of 29% of drug or alcohol abuse. For those children who were given Ritalin at a higher age ? 8 through 12, according to the study ? the percentage of future abuse was much higher, at 44%. However, the overall findings indicate that it might be less a matter of Ritalin itself, and more connected to the presence of ADHD in the child.
The second team was from the Massachusetts General Hospital, led by a Dr. Joseph Biederman. Like the NYU study, this team focused on attempting to find long-term data for the problem to truly evaluate the risk factors involved in the use of ADHD medication. The team tracked a group of boys with ADHD for a decade, with some of that group having received medication in the form of stimulants while others were not given any. The findings showed that those who were given pharmaceutical treatments for their condition showed neither an increase nor decrease in their risks of falling to alcohol or drug abuse as young adults. The risk factors, according to the study, were the same as the portion of the group that had not been given any sort of medication.
Some consider the results of these studies to be very timely, in light of the recent finding that 5 to 10% of all children in the world are diagnosed with ADHD. Addiction, being considered a global problem on a similar ? of not worse ? scale, has also been a concern. The findings show that there is no increased risk, which means that parents can feel at ease with them, and doctors no longer have to worry about seeking alternative treatments for the condition.
Teenagers And Drug Abuse
Drug abuse testing is mandatory by law for many jobs and professions, such as commercial drivers, law enforcement and other emergency personnel, and required by most employers and sports associations. The substances being tested for may not always be illegal; in the case of athletes, many performance enhancing drugs and/or steroids may also be screened for violation of rules, rather than laws.
There are two sides to the issue of drug abuse testing: safety of others, and the invasion of one's privacy. Many people feel that had our forefathers foreseen the technology to screen our blood and urine for the presence of chemicals, they would have included bodily fluids into the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution; the right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.
Others see drug screening as a way to keep them safer. For example, many people feel that it is legitimate to ?invade our privacy? if it will keep truck drivers or forklift operators from operating potentially deadly equipment while under the influence of illegal drugs. Some people wish to work in an environment where they are not surrounded by other workers who use drugs, whether for safety reasons or personal preference.
In the world of sports, use of performance enhancing drugs gives an unfair advantage over other athletes who do not partake in the use of steroids or other boosting agents. Drug testing is therefore used by athletic associations to keep the players honest and within the guidelines allowed.
When drug abuse testing first came out, it was very easy to get false positive results from items that were similar to illegal drugs. Many people tested positive for heroin use from taking over the counter pain relievers such as Motrin, and poppy seeds were another common ingredient that gave false positive results. Over the years, the tests have become more refined; designed to screen out potential products or foods that could give a positive reading and possibly deny a person employment or worse yet, show drugs in their system after a fatal accident involving a commercial vehicle, where testing for the presence of illegal drugs is required by law.
In addition to the many labs and private companies that offer drug abuse testing on a commercial level, there are now home test kits available for parents who may suspect that their children may be using illegal drugs, or for people who may be facing a commercial drug test for an upcoming job interview. Many people still feel that these tests are intrusive to their privacy, and may elect to purchase a kit that allows them to ?fool? the commercial test, and may use a home drug test kit one or more times prior to the actual test, to ensure that they will appear clean when they go to the lab.
Whatever reason you may have for taking one, or whether you agree with these tests or not, drug abuse testing has come a long way over the past decade and a half.
Both Harvey Ong & Christy are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Harvey Ong has sinced written about articles on various topics from Acupuncture Chiropractor, Birth Control and Online Dating. Harvey Ong is a part-time researcher, with special interest in the occult, medical anomalies, herbal lore, and psychology.Want receive Updates regarding our Products,Promos and Freebies visit. Harvey Ong's top article generates over 18100 views. to your Favourites.
Christy has sinced written about articles on various topics from Disease & illness, Medicine and Getting Pregnant. The article is prepared by Christy Berger who writes for .Some information about this article is taken from these resources:. Christy's top article generates over 74000 views. to your Favourites.
About Women In Business We know that any woman who is a wife and mother and also in business, could do the job of two air traffic controllers without breaking a sweat even as the airport burns to the ground