First of all, Jesus would make it quite clear that he could not accept the way people defile their bodies through illegitimate sexual acts.

The act of intimacy is a physical sacrament to confirm the sacred union between a man and a woman in marriage.

To engage in sex with anyone to whom one is not married in the sight of God, is a solemn mockery of the first sacrament and commandment.

Jesus would not mince his words, particularly not knowing that many confessing Christians take part in making filth of that which ought to be a thing of beauty.

Do you think the networks would give him air-time to proclaim this message? How long before he would be accused by the gay-movement, the liberals and the lefties?

How long before he would be dragged into court, accused of discrimination and violating the rights of free expression, etc.?

It will not be hard to find hundreds of thousands of angry witnesses, ready to testify as falsely as the witnesses at his real trial. Or if they do not testify falsely, they will lean on the words of immoral and back-bone-free legislators, which make any act of deviance and degradation permissible.

How long before men and women driven by animal urges shouts "Crucify Him?" And there would be many confessing Christians in that chanting crowd.

The hormone-controlled masses would not be willing to return the claim they think they have staked from a passive God. They do not want to return to sneaking in shame with their acts of the flesh.

The second order of business on the To-Do-List of Jesus would be: "Suffer the little children to be home with their mothers and to have loving fathers in their home, if not, of many such will - as they grow up - be the kingdom of Satan, beginning with the prisons"

In mansions and cottages throughout the world, there would be a roar that would dwarf the cry from Ramah:

"What rights does he have?" ignoring that he created them, and purchased them with his blood.

"He has no right to judge me!" not knowing that the Father has given him that very right.

"What does he know about our times?" forgetting that he gave the prophets visions of our time.

"He cannot command us to do anything, we don't even believe in him!" not seeing clearly that their believing or not does not eliminate the God of the whole earth.

Women shall demand him silenced, since he teaches subversive doctrines and obviously hates women.

In this uproar hardly anybody would hear him testify that she who loses her life for his sake shall find it.

The question would go forth; what right does Jesus have to come and tell the Church how to live? He had his time; he should leave this time to the educated and the enlightened.

All too many have forgotten that Jesus created male and female, and knows exactly what is good for them and their children.

If Jesus would have been born in our times, he would have been put to death very quickly for the rights to people to have sex as they please, and women to give away their children without guilty consciences.

And the absolute rage over this article would not exist if it wasn't for that guilty conscience.