Despite Google's statements to the contrary, many website owners still believe in the existence of the Google sandbox. According to this theory, new sites discovered by Google's crawlers are always placed in a special "sandbox" separate from the main Google index. Sites in this sandbox are kept out of the main index -- and the search results pages -- until the next major update of the Google index, which could be months away. Domains that are already out of the sandbox are therefore perceived as being more valuable to own.
Google's official line, however, is that the sandbox has never existed. A recent search engine optimization (SEO) contest, the Redscowl Bluesingsky Contest, has proven them correct. Sponsored by SEOlogs.com (see http://www.seologs.com/contest.html), this contest revolves around a made-up phrase previously not found in the Google index, "Redscowl Bluesingsky". Webmasters had 62 days to get a page with that phrase into Google's index. The winner would be the page ranking #1 on the most of Google's data centers (because Google results are served from several different locations across the globe) at the end of the contest period.
The key rule in the contest, however, was that only new domains registered at or after the start of the contest could qualify. If the sandbox truly existed, then, it would stand to reason that none of these sites would make it into Google's index during the contest period. But that wasn't the case. Almost immediately, a number of domain names incorporating "redscowl" and "bluesingsky" were registered in various top-level domains and immediately made there way into the Google index. Using keywords in a domain name is a well-known SEO technique for associating a website with those keywords, and many contestants took advantage of this fact.
Some contestants, however, managed to get their pages to rank highly without including the keywords in the domain name. The "Redscowl Bluesingsky or Redscowl-Bluesingsky?" page at http://www.cluelessabout.com/redscowl%20bluesingsky.html is one example that uses standard SEO techniques to rank well for its chosen keywords, including using the keywords in:
* the name of the page;
* the page title;
* bolded text;
* headings;
* links within the site; and
* links from other sites.
(It should be noted that most of the other contestants also used these techniques to great advantage in addition to using the keywords in their domain names.)
What this contest shows, then, is that new sites are not automatically sandboxed by Google just because they're new. Any site that isn't in the index is being filtered for some reason related to the quality of the site's content. More than likely, the site's done something that raises a number of red flags within Google's indexing process.
The conclusion you can draw from this? Study the top-ranked entries in the contest and see what the SEO experts have done to ensure that their sites don't get filtered out of the Google index. And be sure to read and understand Google's Webmaster Guidelines (http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html). Play by the rules to ensure Google indexes your site and you reap the benefits of that indexing.
Why God Doesnt Exist
As a blanket, catch-all statement, it is only partially true. God cares that you recognize Him as the creator. What I'm referring to is the "how" of creation.
As Christians, we all have the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit guides us, convicting us of sin. If our thoughts about the length of creation are not correct, then why hasn't the Holy Spirit convicted us of this sin? Why is it, when I pray for wisdom to understand young earth arguments, God grants me that wisdom? Of course, the flip side of this is equally puzzling. If the length of days of creation are not 24-hours, when why doesn't the Holy Spirit convict the young earth believers that they are wrong?
Could it be that this is not a matter of sin? Could it be that what we think about the "how" of creation is not important to God? It would appear to be the case. God lets us argue these points back and forth, without convicting either side, through the Holy Spirit, that we are wrong. What is important is that we both have Jesus Christ. That really is the only important point from God's perspective.
The words of Leroy Eims, former president of the Navigators, sums it up best. He said;
Can you imagine everything Jesus could have talked to people about? After all, He was the eternal Son of God who knew everything about everything. He could have explained all the scientific wonders of the universe or warned against the various manmade philosophies that would arise over the years--how each of them would lead down a blind alley and leave the followers of those teachings confused and frustrated. But Jesus didn't deal with any of those things. Instead, He focused on what people need most--the good news of salvation. Why? Because unless people hear and respond to the gospel, they are lost and going to a Christless grave (Footnote 1).
I think he is right on target. If it did matter what we thought about creation, God's Spirit would convict us, and steer us to the truth. The only thing that really matters is whether we have Jesus.
All too often, young earth creationists compare old earth creationism to sin, and claim that our path is incorrect, and amounts to cooperation with the devil. Such a claim can be seen in the young earth book, After Eden, by Henry Morris III. On page 174-175, he makes a distinction (one of many throughout the book) that young earth creationists represent "truth," "light," and "wisdom," with the implication that all others are evil deceivers (2 Cor. 11:13-15). Such slanderous words have no basis in fact, and they are not what one would expect from a professing Christian. None of the verses employed by Mr. Morris in this section have anything to do with creation.
As a Progressive Creationist, I fully believe in the inerrant, infallible Word of God, and a literal interpretation of Genesis. Yes, some old earth proponents do not believe in inerrancy, and they need a warning, but Morris makes no distinction.
If God does not care which form of creation you believe in, then Morris claims are empty rhetoric. There is no need for young earth creationists to resort to such tactics. Jesus is what matters...not the "how" of creation. We should busy ourselves in proclaiming Christ...not condemning fellow believers.
Footnote 1: From the Navpress Book, Daily Discipleship, which features devotionals taken from radio broadcasts by long-time Navigator LeRoy Eims. To subscribe to a daily devotional email from the Navigators, visit http://www.navlists.org/dailydiscipleship/index.php'go=subscribe.
Both Eric Giguere & Greg Neyman are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Eric Giguere has sinced written about articles on various topics from Dogs, Computers and The Internet. . Eric Giguere's top article generates over 1300 views. to your Favourites.
Greg Neyman has sinced written about articles on various topics from Science, Religion and Computers and The Internet. Greg Neyman is the founder of the website ministry . The original location of this article is. Greg Neyman's top article generates over 40500 views. to your Favourites.
Cost Of Gas Calculator All of us who drive must buy gas. If we use inkjet printers, we must buy inkjet cartridges.Its time for the public to speak out about some of our overpriced fixed costs