The violence on the fields is rising up and the UEFA is expected to take a tough line following the violent scenes presented in the Olympic Stadium. The main problem is that even when the UEFA is currently gathering evidence and will be studying the official reports of the referee to further action, the UEFA is just a football authority not an order authority to punish the guilty.
Incidents as the one in Roma are happening all around the world, actually only 24 hours after the disturbs In the Olympic Stadium; Spanish police had to intervene using batons to disperse a group of Tottenham Hotspur fans before UEFA Cup quarter-final first leg against Seville in Spain.
The mistakes are numerous, fans are not being search at the time they enter the stadium, security at the doors is not aware of the fact that fans can bring bottles and things to throw. Actually, the behavior of the police inside the stadium is not to prevent violence, they are even fuelling it and making everything worse.
Viewers at home saw pictures showed fans repeatedly beaten by the police, they were witness of what is expected to be a recreational show and sadly became a big fight between fans and police and all against fair play sport’s values.
However, The Union of European Football Associations can not resolve the problem outside the stadium; they can not even punish the fans. We all have to go to the bottom of the problem, the aggression of the Italian police and the conduct of English fans won’t be modify by playing behind close doors or making the teams pay big amounts of money. The zero tolerance starts on us and the way we all see the football as fans, the law comes to scene to punish but not to prevent.
European Football, UEFA, violence, soccer, UEFA Cup, soccer troubles, football, Manchester United, Olympic Stadium.
Zero Tolerance Policy Schools
Sooner or later, your company change process will reach The Moment of Truth - the point where you, the key decision-maker, are faced with a choice between the past and the future. Every atom of your being, every instinct and every ounce of experience will urge you towards the familiar, safe decision. But if you take that route, the process is doomed to fail.
You and your board of directors may have committed yourselves to an environment based on "trust and respect"; or to a culture where "initiative and creativity are recognised and rewarded". But the people who work for you will be watching and waiting for the evidence that this time it's for real. That's because actions speak louder than words. And that's where 'Zero Tolerance' comes in.
Two Examples
The Master Salesman
In company A, the Sales Director was a master salesman. Over the previous three years he had personally closed deals worth 30% of the company's gross sales. The downside was that he was an arrogant person, capable of behaving very unpleasantly. He believed that his value to the company meant that he could behave however he liked, and no-one would dare to challenge him. He announced that they could come up with "any fancy ideas they liked"; he had no intention of changing the way he behaved.
We suggested that at this point the rest of the Directors had three options:
The Sales Director might be persuaded to play a full, positive role in the change programme; a long shot, but worth trying.
They could abandon the programme now, before involving anyone outside the Board; to proceed with a member of the team blatantly acting in contradiction of the new values would be worse than doing nothing.
They could replace the Sales Director; not a choice to be made lightly, given the (commercial) value he brought to the company.
Within weeks it became clear that persuasion wasn't going to work; and after some difficult conversations they negotiated his departure.
That decision did more than anything else the Board could have done to make the change programme a success. Before they even knew what the new company values were, every member of staff knew that this time they were for real; this was one change programme that the Directors really intended to deliver. What's more, within 12 months they'd recovered the lost business, and staff turnover in the Sales Department had dropped from eleven to five per cent.
The Partnership
Company B was an old-fashioned partnership, a firm of accountants. They'd recently been taken over by a plc, and had now decided that they needed to change the way they worked, shifting from a "partnership" culture to a more 'commercial' style. A key part of the change was for Senior Partners (now 'Directors') to take on a much stronger management role. Until now, their bonuses had been based solely on the amount of business they personally brought in; in future, it was to depend on the development and performance of the 'consultants' and 'associates' they managed.
One by one, they rebelled; and one by one the company backed down and let them have what they wanted. 'Charles' would no longer be a Director; he was to take on a role as 'Senior Adviser' on Financial Services - without any line management responsibility. 'Tom' would be a Senior Adviser on Insurance - the company was keen not to lose his expertise...
Unfortunately, everyone in the company was perfectly well aware of what was happening. (They always are!) The message sent out was that the new 'commercial' culture was optional; and like most optional change, it didn't happen.
The Moment of Truth
Every change programme, sooner or later, reaches the point where it's easier and more comfortable for you and your fellow leaders to stay with the status quo than to go forward. This is the moment of truth. It's the moment that everyone in the company has been waiting for; the moment when they make up their mind whether this time it's for real. The signal that you send at this moment is critical. The right decision will do more to drive things forward than any number of motivational posters and company meetings. The wrong decision is fatal.
What would it take to have your company culture operate Zero Tolerance, in respect of any behaviour which falls outside the Values you, your fellow Directors and your staff are committed to? It would mean that everyone, from the most senior executive to the most junior trainee, demanded the same high standards of themselves and of those around them.
And it might mean taking those tough decisions. Think long and hard about this before getting into a company change programme - one day, it might come down to (temporarily) risking those familiar, safe patterns of running the business, taking action to uphold your values, and actually putting your money where your mouth is!
Both Julie Smith & Kate Mercer are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Julie Smith has sinced written about articles on various topics from Recreation and Sports, Soccer and Recreation and Sports. Julie Smith is one of the most recognized copy writers on and currently writes for Instant Action Sports. Feel free to reprint this artic. Julie Smith's top article generates over 550000 views. to your Favourites.
Kate Mercer has sinced written about articles on various topics from Building Brand Identity, SEO Search Engine Optimization and Insurance for Business. At Shine Consulting, we work with leaders who are consciously engaged in designing their organisations to be places where people:- are consistently passionate, inspired and committed- produce results well beyond the predictable normIn short, organisations. Kate Mercer's top article generates over 2400 views. to your Favourites.
Christian Relationships And Dating Learning and growing may be a part of life that never ends despite achievements and goals that are met but you should be, for the most part enjoying the experience, gain the confidence to do just tha...