My question to you is: Are you a leader or a manager?
You see, when you go to school, you don't learn to become successful; what you learn in school is how to become a good employee!
And that's a problem for me, you see I never wanted to become an employee (no matter how highly paid); I'm a natural born entrepreneur!
You see being an employee is good (for some people), but being a boss is better; in the same way, being a manager is good (for some people), but being a leader is far better but you don't learn that.
Below, I want to review with you a comparison list between a Manager and a Leader.
People follow the manager because they are told to.
People follow the leader because they want to.
The manager uses the fear of loss to make people work.
The leader uses goal achievement to make people work.
The manager is controlling his people.
The leader is caring for his people.
The manager is the sole decision maker.
The leader always brainstorms and consults with his team.
The manager is limited by his own capacity.
The leader can leverage the energy of his team.
The manager has employees.
The leader has partners.
The manager make people work.
The leader work with his people.
The manager tells people what to do.
The leader shows people what to do.
The manager is feared.
The leader is respected.
The manager sees people as expenses and tools as asset.
The leader sees tools as expenses and people as asset.
If the manager fails, his employees will leave him.
If the leader fails, his team will support him.
So let me ask you again:
Are you a leader or a manager?
Article written by Dr. Nicolas Prudhon.
Difference Between A Leader And Manager
Almost 100 years ago, Mary Parker Follett described a manager as "One who gets things done through people". This description is still used by management educators and scholars today. However, this could be enhanced to read: "One who gets the things the organisation requires the manager to get done, through the people who report to that manager"
These additions are suggested because:
- You become a manager when you sign on for the job
- You only become a leader when your people say so
You are given the title of "manager" by the organisation. People will do things for you, either well or not so well depending on how well you manage them, because of WHAT you are not WHO you are.
Only your people, your team, the people you manage, can give you the title of "leader".
Another way of putting it is to say that the organisation gives you your "corporate" manager's hat when you sign on. This lets everyone in the organisation know that you are now officially a manager. Then, your people, when they believe in you and only when they believe in you and are prepared to follow you, give you your leadership badge, your badge of honour!
Let me make a very important point. Managing can be described as more mechanical and so there are guidelines to follow, whereas leading is always measured through others' perceptions.
Here's a quick test to gain some indication on your current status as a leader.
Once you have been in your current role for say, nine to twelve months, ask yourself:
- "Would my people do the things I now ask them to do even if I were not their manager?"
- If you can truthfully answer "Yes", then you are well on the path to becoming a leader.
Many of you will probably answer this with a "Maybe". The road to leadership is a long one, but a truly rewarding one. If you are concerned that it seems to be taking you forever to develop as a leader, keep in mind the experience of one of the greatest leaders of our time, Nelson Mandela who spent 27 years in prison waiting to show how he could lead his country!
Are leaders born or made? Can I become a leader?
It might be reasonable to assume that leadership can be developed. However, there has been and still is, considerable debate on the issue. Even the experts are divided.
A colleague, Professor Preston Bottger who is Professor of Leadership at the International Institute for Management Development in Switzerland, tells the story of when he was asked by his eight year old daughter's teacher to address her school class on leadership.
"How do you talk to eight year olds about leadership?" he said. So, being a professor, he asked the class the obvious question:
"Who can tell me what a leader is?"
Straight away a boy in the front row put up his hand:
"A leader does things first", he enthused.
His response was quickly followed by an equally enthusiastic girl who said:
"Leaders have followers".
Could the "experts" give us any better answers than those? - "Leaders do things first"; and "Leaders have followers".
Using the definition of leadership these children gave Preston, do you know any people whom you might call leaders?
When people are asked this question, they often respond with the names of famous historical leaders such as Gandhi, Kennedy, Churchill and more recently, Mandela. Chances are however, you've personally been greatly influenced by people around you who display leadership, but whom you've not credited or thought of, as leaders before. For example, parents, siblings, teachers, managers and colleagues who have acted as role models for you and whose advice you have followed from time to time.
In fact, we generally only think of these people as leaders well after they have had an influence on us.
Think for a moment about the famous world leaders that come to mind when you are asked to name leaders. Now, compare them to some of the people who have had a major impact on you personally. It's likely that these two groups share many of the same qualities, but more importantly, they actually do many of the same things.
What are these "things" that leaders do that set them apart from others? Can you too learn how to do them?
Leaders become leaders because they do at least four things for us that make us inclined to follow them:
1 - They help us understand and make sense of our environment So for example, when things aren't working out or are unclear for us, they are able to explain what is happening in practical terms that we can understand.
2 - They help give us a sense of direction. They are able to paint a picture of a brighter future and help us believe that we can achieve the things we want to achieve.
3 - They give us a belief in the values that are important to us. In doing so, they make us feel part of a team of people that share these values and have the same aims.
4 - They are able to make us feel powerful They allow us the freedom to make decisions about our life, work and the future, especially as a group. They give the group a feeling of power to achieve group goals - the group becomes a team under an effective leader.
Do these sound like some of the things your personal leaders have done for you? Probably those people who have had a major influence on you, all did these leadership "things" and by definition therefore, can be considered leaders.
Both Dr. Nicolas Prudhon & Bob Selden are contributors for EditorialToday. The above articles have been edited for relevancy and timeliness. All write-ups, reviews, tips and guides published by EditorialToday.com and its partners or affiliates are for informational purposes only. They should not be used for any legal or any other type of advice. We do not endorse any author, contributor, writer or article posted by our team.
Dr. Nicolas Prudhon has sinced written about articles on various topics from . Dr. Nicolas Prudhon is an Expert in Network Marketing and the Author of "Master of Duplication" (http://www.masterofduplication.com). To Share his Success and Learn More on How to Expand Your Downline, go to http://nicolas.subuilder.com. Dr. Nicolas Prudhon's top article generates over 1000 views. to your Favourites.
Bob Selden has sinced written about articles on various topics from Management, Customer Service and Education. is the author of the newly published "What To Do When You Become The Boss" - a self help book for new managers. He also coaches at the International. Bob Selden's top article generates over 27100 views. to your Favourites.
Cash Flow To Creditors Cheap credit can easily be measured being any credit received that costs less than the cost of other methods of borrowing